Cargando…

Dominance in Domestic Dogs: A Quantitative Analysis of Its Behavioural Measures

A dominance hierarchy is an important feature of the social organisation of group living animals. Although formal and/or agonistic dominance has been found in captive wolves and free-ranging dogs, applicability of the dominance concept in domestic dogs is highly debated, and quantitative data are sc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Borg, Joanne A. M., Schilder, Matthijs B. H., Vinke, Claudia M., de Vries, Han
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4556277/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26309101
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133978
_version_ 1782388327298629632
author van der Borg, Joanne A. M.
Schilder, Matthijs B. H.
Vinke, Claudia M.
de Vries, Han
author_facet van der Borg, Joanne A. M.
Schilder, Matthijs B. H.
Vinke, Claudia M.
de Vries, Han
author_sort van der Borg, Joanne A. M.
collection PubMed
description A dominance hierarchy is an important feature of the social organisation of group living animals. Although formal and/or agonistic dominance has been found in captive wolves and free-ranging dogs, applicability of the dominance concept in domestic dogs is highly debated, and quantitative data are scarce. Therefore, we investigated 7 body postures and 24 behaviours in a group of domestic dogs for their suitability as formal status indicators. The results showed that high posture, displayed in most dyadic relationships, and muzzle bite, displayed exclusively by the highest ranking dogs, qualified best as formal dominance indicators. The best formal submission indicator was body tail wag, covering most relationships, and two low postures, covering two-thirds of the relationships. In addition, both mouth lick, as included in Schenkel’s active submission, and pass under head qualified as formal submission indicators but were shown almost exclusively towards the highest ranking dogs. Furthermore, a status assessment based on changes in posture displays, i.e., lowering of posture (LoP) into half-low, low, low-on-back or on-back, was the best status indicator for most relationships as it showed good coverage (91% of the dyads), a nearly linear hierarchy (h’ = 0.94, p<0.003) and strong unidirectionality (DCI = 0.97). The associated steepness of 0.79 (p<0.0001) indicated a tolerant dominance style for this dog group. No significant correlations of rank with age or weight were found. Strong co-variation between LoP, high posture, and body tail wag justified the use of dominance as an intervening variable. Our results are in line with previous findings for captive wolves and free-ranging dogs, for formal dominance with strong linearity based on submission but not aggression. They indicate that the ethogram for dogs is best redefined by distinguishing body postures from behavioural activities. A good insight into dominance hierarchies and its indicators will be helpful in properly interpreting dog-dog relationships and diagnosing problem behaviour in dogs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4556277
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45562772015-09-25 Dominance in Domestic Dogs: A Quantitative Analysis of Its Behavioural Measures van der Borg, Joanne A. M. Schilder, Matthijs B. H. Vinke, Claudia M. de Vries, Han PLoS One Research Article A dominance hierarchy is an important feature of the social organisation of group living animals. Although formal and/or agonistic dominance has been found in captive wolves and free-ranging dogs, applicability of the dominance concept in domestic dogs is highly debated, and quantitative data are scarce. Therefore, we investigated 7 body postures and 24 behaviours in a group of domestic dogs for their suitability as formal status indicators. The results showed that high posture, displayed in most dyadic relationships, and muzzle bite, displayed exclusively by the highest ranking dogs, qualified best as formal dominance indicators. The best formal submission indicator was body tail wag, covering most relationships, and two low postures, covering two-thirds of the relationships. In addition, both mouth lick, as included in Schenkel’s active submission, and pass under head qualified as formal submission indicators but were shown almost exclusively towards the highest ranking dogs. Furthermore, a status assessment based on changes in posture displays, i.e., lowering of posture (LoP) into half-low, low, low-on-back or on-back, was the best status indicator for most relationships as it showed good coverage (91% of the dyads), a nearly linear hierarchy (h’ = 0.94, p<0.003) and strong unidirectionality (DCI = 0.97). The associated steepness of 0.79 (p<0.0001) indicated a tolerant dominance style for this dog group. No significant correlations of rank with age or weight were found. Strong co-variation between LoP, high posture, and body tail wag justified the use of dominance as an intervening variable. Our results are in line with previous findings for captive wolves and free-ranging dogs, for formal dominance with strong linearity based on submission but not aggression. They indicate that the ethogram for dogs is best redefined by distinguishing body postures from behavioural activities. A good insight into dominance hierarchies and its indicators will be helpful in properly interpreting dog-dog relationships and diagnosing problem behaviour in dogs. Public Library of Science 2015-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4556277/ /pubmed/26309101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133978 Text en © 2015 van der Borg et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
van der Borg, Joanne A. M.
Schilder, Matthijs B. H.
Vinke, Claudia M.
de Vries, Han
Dominance in Domestic Dogs: A Quantitative Analysis of Its Behavioural Measures
title Dominance in Domestic Dogs: A Quantitative Analysis of Its Behavioural Measures
title_full Dominance in Domestic Dogs: A Quantitative Analysis of Its Behavioural Measures
title_fullStr Dominance in Domestic Dogs: A Quantitative Analysis of Its Behavioural Measures
title_full_unstemmed Dominance in Domestic Dogs: A Quantitative Analysis of Its Behavioural Measures
title_short Dominance in Domestic Dogs: A Quantitative Analysis of Its Behavioural Measures
title_sort dominance in domestic dogs: a quantitative analysis of its behavioural measures
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4556277/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26309101
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133978
work_keys_str_mv AT vanderborgjoanneam dominanceindomesticdogsaquantitativeanalysisofitsbehaviouralmeasures
AT schildermatthijsbh dominanceindomesticdogsaquantitativeanalysisofitsbehaviouralmeasures
AT vinkeclaudiam dominanceindomesticdogsaquantitativeanalysisofitsbehaviouralmeasures
AT devrieshan dominanceindomesticdogsaquantitativeanalysisofitsbehaviouralmeasures