Cargando…
Dominance in Domestic Dogs: A Quantitative Analysis of Its Behavioural Measures
A dominance hierarchy is an important feature of the social organisation of group living animals. Although formal and/or agonistic dominance has been found in captive wolves and free-ranging dogs, applicability of the dominance concept in domestic dogs is highly debated, and quantitative data are sc...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4556277/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26309101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133978 |
_version_ | 1782388327298629632 |
---|---|
author | van der Borg, Joanne A. M. Schilder, Matthijs B. H. Vinke, Claudia M. de Vries, Han |
author_facet | van der Borg, Joanne A. M. Schilder, Matthijs B. H. Vinke, Claudia M. de Vries, Han |
author_sort | van der Borg, Joanne A. M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | A dominance hierarchy is an important feature of the social organisation of group living animals. Although formal and/or agonistic dominance has been found in captive wolves and free-ranging dogs, applicability of the dominance concept in domestic dogs is highly debated, and quantitative data are scarce. Therefore, we investigated 7 body postures and 24 behaviours in a group of domestic dogs for their suitability as formal status indicators. The results showed that high posture, displayed in most dyadic relationships, and muzzle bite, displayed exclusively by the highest ranking dogs, qualified best as formal dominance indicators. The best formal submission indicator was body tail wag, covering most relationships, and two low postures, covering two-thirds of the relationships. In addition, both mouth lick, as included in Schenkel’s active submission, and pass under head qualified as formal submission indicators but were shown almost exclusively towards the highest ranking dogs. Furthermore, a status assessment based on changes in posture displays, i.e., lowering of posture (LoP) into half-low, low, low-on-back or on-back, was the best status indicator for most relationships as it showed good coverage (91% of the dyads), a nearly linear hierarchy (h’ = 0.94, p<0.003) and strong unidirectionality (DCI = 0.97). The associated steepness of 0.79 (p<0.0001) indicated a tolerant dominance style for this dog group. No significant correlations of rank with age or weight were found. Strong co-variation between LoP, high posture, and body tail wag justified the use of dominance as an intervening variable. Our results are in line with previous findings for captive wolves and free-ranging dogs, for formal dominance with strong linearity based on submission but not aggression. They indicate that the ethogram for dogs is best redefined by distinguishing body postures from behavioural activities. A good insight into dominance hierarchies and its indicators will be helpful in properly interpreting dog-dog relationships and diagnosing problem behaviour in dogs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4556277 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45562772015-09-25 Dominance in Domestic Dogs: A Quantitative Analysis of Its Behavioural Measures van der Borg, Joanne A. M. Schilder, Matthijs B. H. Vinke, Claudia M. de Vries, Han PLoS One Research Article A dominance hierarchy is an important feature of the social organisation of group living animals. Although formal and/or agonistic dominance has been found in captive wolves and free-ranging dogs, applicability of the dominance concept in domestic dogs is highly debated, and quantitative data are scarce. Therefore, we investigated 7 body postures and 24 behaviours in a group of domestic dogs for their suitability as formal status indicators. The results showed that high posture, displayed in most dyadic relationships, and muzzle bite, displayed exclusively by the highest ranking dogs, qualified best as formal dominance indicators. The best formal submission indicator was body tail wag, covering most relationships, and two low postures, covering two-thirds of the relationships. In addition, both mouth lick, as included in Schenkel’s active submission, and pass under head qualified as formal submission indicators but were shown almost exclusively towards the highest ranking dogs. Furthermore, a status assessment based on changes in posture displays, i.e., lowering of posture (LoP) into half-low, low, low-on-back or on-back, was the best status indicator for most relationships as it showed good coverage (91% of the dyads), a nearly linear hierarchy (h’ = 0.94, p<0.003) and strong unidirectionality (DCI = 0.97). The associated steepness of 0.79 (p<0.0001) indicated a tolerant dominance style for this dog group. No significant correlations of rank with age or weight were found. Strong co-variation between LoP, high posture, and body tail wag justified the use of dominance as an intervening variable. Our results are in line with previous findings for captive wolves and free-ranging dogs, for formal dominance with strong linearity based on submission but not aggression. They indicate that the ethogram for dogs is best redefined by distinguishing body postures from behavioural activities. A good insight into dominance hierarchies and its indicators will be helpful in properly interpreting dog-dog relationships and diagnosing problem behaviour in dogs. Public Library of Science 2015-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4556277/ /pubmed/26309101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133978 Text en © 2015 van der Borg et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article van der Borg, Joanne A. M. Schilder, Matthijs B. H. Vinke, Claudia M. de Vries, Han Dominance in Domestic Dogs: A Quantitative Analysis of Its Behavioural Measures |
title | Dominance in Domestic Dogs: A Quantitative Analysis of Its Behavioural Measures |
title_full | Dominance in Domestic Dogs: A Quantitative Analysis of Its Behavioural Measures |
title_fullStr | Dominance in Domestic Dogs: A Quantitative Analysis of Its Behavioural Measures |
title_full_unstemmed | Dominance in Domestic Dogs: A Quantitative Analysis of Its Behavioural Measures |
title_short | Dominance in Domestic Dogs: A Quantitative Analysis of Its Behavioural Measures |
title_sort | dominance in domestic dogs: a quantitative analysis of its behavioural measures |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4556277/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26309101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133978 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanderborgjoanneam dominanceindomesticdogsaquantitativeanalysisofitsbehaviouralmeasures AT schildermatthijsbh dominanceindomesticdogsaquantitativeanalysisofitsbehaviouralmeasures AT vinkeclaudiam dominanceindomesticdogsaquantitativeanalysisofitsbehaviouralmeasures AT devrieshan dominanceindomesticdogsaquantitativeanalysisofitsbehaviouralmeasures |