Cargando…

Memory reconsolidation may be disrupted by a distractor stimulus presented during reactivation

Memories can be destabilized by the reexposure to the training context, and may reconsolidate into a modified engram. Reconsolidation relies on some particular molecular mechanisms involving LVGCCs and GluN2B-containing NMDARs. In this study we investigate the interference caused by the presence of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Crestani, Ana Paula, Zacouteguy Boos, Flávia, Haubrich, Josué, Ordoñez Sierra, Rodrigo, Santana, Fabiana, Molina, Johanna Marcela Duran, Cassini, Lindsey de Freitas, Alvares, Lucas de Oliveira, Quillfeldt, Jorge Alberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4556962/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26328547
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep13633
_version_ 1782388422954975232
author Crestani, Ana Paula
Zacouteguy Boos, Flávia
Haubrich, Josué
Ordoñez Sierra, Rodrigo
Santana, Fabiana
Molina, Johanna Marcela Duran
Cassini, Lindsey de Freitas
Alvares, Lucas de Oliveira
Quillfeldt, Jorge Alberto
author_facet Crestani, Ana Paula
Zacouteguy Boos, Flávia
Haubrich, Josué
Ordoñez Sierra, Rodrigo
Santana, Fabiana
Molina, Johanna Marcela Duran
Cassini, Lindsey de Freitas
Alvares, Lucas de Oliveira
Quillfeldt, Jorge Alberto
author_sort Crestani, Ana Paula
collection PubMed
description Memories can be destabilized by the reexposure to the training context, and may reconsolidate into a modified engram. Reconsolidation relies on some particular molecular mechanisms involving LVGCCs and GluN2B-containing NMDARs. In this study we investigate the interference caused by the presence of a distractor - a brief, unanticipated stimulus that impair a fear memory expression - during the reactivation session, and tested the hypothesis that this disruptive effect relies on a reconsolidation process. Rats previously trained in the contextual fear conditioning (CFC) were reactivated in the presence or absence of a distractor stimulus. In the test, groups reactivated in the original context with distractor displayed a reduction of the freezing response lasting up to 20 days. To check for the involvement of destabilization / reconsolidation mechanisms, we studied the effect of systemic nimodipine (a L-VGCC blocker) or intra-CA1 ifenprodil (a selective GluN2B/NMDAR antagonist) infused right before the reactivation session. Both treatments were able to prevent the disruptive effect of distraction. Ifenprodil results also bolstered the case for hippocampus as the putative brain structure hosting this phenomenon. Our results provide some evidence in support of a behavioral, non-invasive procedure that was able to disrupt an aversive memory in a long-lasting way.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4556962
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45569622015-09-11 Memory reconsolidation may be disrupted by a distractor stimulus presented during reactivation Crestani, Ana Paula Zacouteguy Boos, Flávia Haubrich, Josué Ordoñez Sierra, Rodrigo Santana, Fabiana Molina, Johanna Marcela Duran Cassini, Lindsey de Freitas Alvares, Lucas de Oliveira Quillfeldt, Jorge Alberto Sci Rep Article Memories can be destabilized by the reexposure to the training context, and may reconsolidate into a modified engram. Reconsolidation relies on some particular molecular mechanisms involving LVGCCs and GluN2B-containing NMDARs. In this study we investigate the interference caused by the presence of a distractor - a brief, unanticipated stimulus that impair a fear memory expression - during the reactivation session, and tested the hypothesis that this disruptive effect relies on a reconsolidation process. Rats previously trained in the contextual fear conditioning (CFC) were reactivated in the presence or absence of a distractor stimulus. In the test, groups reactivated in the original context with distractor displayed a reduction of the freezing response lasting up to 20 days. To check for the involvement of destabilization / reconsolidation mechanisms, we studied the effect of systemic nimodipine (a L-VGCC blocker) or intra-CA1 ifenprodil (a selective GluN2B/NMDAR antagonist) infused right before the reactivation session. Both treatments were able to prevent the disruptive effect of distraction. Ifenprodil results also bolstered the case for hippocampus as the putative brain structure hosting this phenomenon. Our results provide some evidence in support of a behavioral, non-invasive procedure that was able to disrupt an aversive memory in a long-lasting way. Nature Publishing Group 2015-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4556962/ /pubmed/26328547 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep13633 Text en Copyright © 2015, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Crestani, Ana Paula
Zacouteguy Boos, Flávia
Haubrich, Josué
Ordoñez Sierra, Rodrigo
Santana, Fabiana
Molina, Johanna Marcela Duran
Cassini, Lindsey de Freitas
Alvares, Lucas de Oliveira
Quillfeldt, Jorge Alberto
Memory reconsolidation may be disrupted by a distractor stimulus presented during reactivation
title Memory reconsolidation may be disrupted by a distractor stimulus presented during reactivation
title_full Memory reconsolidation may be disrupted by a distractor stimulus presented during reactivation
title_fullStr Memory reconsolidation may be disrupted by a distractor stimulus presented during reactivation
title_full_unstemmed Memory reconsolidation may be disrupted by a distractor stimulus presented during reactivation
title_short Memory reconsolidation may be disrupted by a distractor stimulus presented during reactivation
title_sort memory reconsolidation may be disrupted by a distractor stimulus presented during reactivation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4556962/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26328547
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep13633
work_keys_str_mv AT crestanianapaula memoryreconsolidationmaybedisruptedbyadistractorstimuluspresentedduringreactivation
AT zacouteguyboosflavia memoryreconsolidationmaybedisruptedbyadistractorstimuluspresentedduringreactivation
AT haubrichjosue memoryreconsolidationmaybedisruptedbyadistractorstimuluspresentedduringreactivation
AT ordonezsierrarodrigo memoryreconsolidationmaybedisruptedbyadistractorstimuluspresentedduringreactivation
AT santanafabiana memoryreconsolidationmaybedisruptedbyadistractorstimuluspresentedduringreactivation
AT molinajohannamarceladuran memoryreconsolidationmaybedisruptedbyadistractorstimuluspresentedduringreactivation
AT cassinilindseydefreitas memoryreconsolidationmaybedisruptedbyadistractorstimuluspresentedduringreactivation
AT alvareslucasdeoliveira memoryreconsolidationmaybedisruptedbyadistractorstimuluspresentedduringreactivation
AT quillfeldtjorgealberto memoryreconsolidationmaybedisruptedbyadistractorstimuluspresentedduringreactivation