Cargando…
Memory reconsolidation may be disrupted by a distractor stimulus presented during reactivation
Memories can be destabilized by the reexposure to the training context, and may reconsolidate into a modified engram. Reconsolidation relies on some particular molecular mechanisms involving LVGCCs and GluN2B-containing NMDARs. In this study we investigate the interference caused by the presence of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4556962/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26328547 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep13633 |
_version_ | 1782388422954975232 |
---|---|
author | Crestani, Ana Paula Zacouteguy Boos, Flávia Haubrich, Josué Ordoñez Sierra, Rodrigo Santana, Fabiana Molina, Johanna Marcela Duran Cassini, Lindsey de Freitas Alvares, Lucas de Oliveira Quillfeldt, Jorge Alberto |
author_facet | Crestani, Ana Paula Zacouteguy Boos, Flávia Haubrich, Josué Ordoñez Sierra, Rodrigo Santana, Fabiana Molina, Johanna Marcela Duran Cassini, Lindsey de Freitas Alvares, Lucas de Oliveira Quillfeldt, Jorge Alberto |
author_sort | Crestani, Ana Paula |
collection | PubMed |
description | Memories can be destabilized by the reexposure to the training context, and may reconsolidate into a modified engram. Reconsolidation relies on some particular molecular mechanisms involving LVGCCs and GluN2B-containing NMDARs. In this study we investigate the interference caused by the presence of a distractor - a brief, unanticipated stimulus that impair a fear memory expression - during the reactivation session, and tested the hypothesis that this disruptive effect relies on a reconsolidation process. Rats previously trained in the contextual fear conditioning (CFC) were reactivated in the presence or absence of a distractor stimulus. In the test, groups reactivated in the original context with distractor displayed a reduction of the freezing response lasting up to 20 days. To check for the involvement of destabilization / reconsolidation mechanisms, we studied the effect of systemic nimodipine (a L-VGCC blocker) or intra-CA1 ifenprodil (a selective GluN2B/NMDAR antagonist) infused right before the reactivation session. Both treatments were able to prevent the disruptive effect of distraction. Ifenprodil results also bolstered the case for hippocampus as the putative brain structure hosting this phenomenon. Our results provide some evidence in support of a behavioral, non-invasive procedure that was able to disrupt an aversive memory in a long-lasting way. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4556962 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45569622015-09-11 Memory reconsolidation may be disrupted by a distractor stimulus presented during reactivation Crestani, Ana Paula Zacouteguy Boos, Flávia Haubrich, Josué Ordoñez Sierra, Rodrigo Santana, Fabiana Molina, Johanna Marcela Duran Cassini, Lindsey de Freitas Alvares, Lucas de Oliveira Quillfeldt, Jorge Alberto Sci Rep Article Memories can be destabilized by the reexposure to the training context, and may reconsolidate into a modified engram. Reconsolidation relies on some particular molecular mechanisms involving LVGCCs and GluN2B-containing NMDARs. In this study we investigate the interference caused by the presence of a distractor - a brief, unanticipated stimulus that impair a fear memory expression - during the reactivation session, and tested the hypothesis that this disruptive effect relies on a reconsolidation process. Rats previously trained in the contextual fear conditioning (CFC) were reactivated in the presence or absence of a distractor stimulus. In the test, groups reactivated in the original context with distractor displayed a reduction of the freezing response lasting up to 20 days. To check for the involvement of destabilization / reconsolidation mechanisms, we studied the effect of systemic nimodipine (a L-VGCC blocker) or intra-CA1 ifenprodil (a selective GluN2B/NMDAR antagonist) infused right before the reactivation session. Both treatments were able to prevent the disruptive effect of distraction. Ifenprodil results also bolstered the case for hippocampus as the putative brain structure hosting this phenomenon. Our results provide some evidence in support of a behavioral, non-invasive procedure that was able to disrupt an aversive memory in a long-lasting way. Nature Publishing Group 2015-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4556962/ /pubmed/26328547 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep13633 Text en Copyright © 2015, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Crestani, Ana Paula Zacouteguy Boos, Flávia Haubrich, Josué Ordoñez Sierra, Rodrigo Santana, Fabiana Molina, Johanna Marcela Duran Cassini, Lindsey de Freitas Alvares, Lucas de Oliveira Quillfeldt, Jorge Alberto Memory reconsolidation may be disrupted by a distractor stimulus presented during reactivation |
title | Memory reconsolidation may be disrupted by a distractor stimulus presented during reactivation |
title_full | Memory reconsolidation may be disrupted by a distractor stimulus presented during reactivation |
title_fullStr | Memory reconsolidation may be disrupted by a distractor stimulus presented during reactivation |
title_full_unstemmed | Memory reconsolidation may be disrupted by a distractor stimulus presented during reactivation |
title_short | Memory reconsolidation may be disrupted by a distractor stimulus presented during reactivation |
title_sort | memory reconsolidation may be disrupted by a distractor stimulus presented during reactivation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4556962/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26328547 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep13633 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT crestanianapaula memoryreconsolidationmaybedisruptedbyadistractorstimuluspresentedduringreactivation AT zacouteguyboosflavia memoryreconsolidationmaybedisruptedbyadistractorstimuluspresentedduringreactivation AT haubrichjosue memoryreconsolidationmaybedisruptedbyadistractorstimuluspresentedduringreactivation AT ordonezsierrarodrigo memoryreconsolidationmaybedisruptedbyadistractorstimuluspresentedduringreactivation AT santanafabiana memoryreconsolidationmaybedisruptedbyadistractorstimuluspresentedduringreactivation AT molinajohannamarceladuran memoryreconsolidationmaybedisruptedbyadistractorstimuluspresentedduringreactivation AT cassinilindseydefreitas memoryreconsolidationmaybedisruptedbyadistractorstimuluspresentedduringreactivation AT alvareslucasdeoliveira memoryreconsolidationmaybedisruptedbyadistractorstimuluspresentedduringreactivation AT quillfeldtjorgealberto memoryreconsolidationmaybedisruptedbyadistractorstimuluspresentedduringreactivation |