Cargando…
Pulsed electromagnetic fields combined with a collagenous scaffold and bone marrow concentrate enhance osteochondral regeneration: an in vivo study
BACKGROUND: The study aimed to evaluate the combined effect of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field (PEMF) biophysical stimulation and bone marrow concentrate (BMC) in osteochondral defect healing in comparison to the treatment with scaffold alone. METHODS: An osteochondral lesion of both knees was performe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4557597/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26328626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0683-2 |
_version_ | 1782388511207325696 |
---|---|
author | Veronesi, Francesca Cadossi, Matteo Giavaresi, Gianluca Martini, Lucia Setti, Stefania Buda, Roberto Giannini, Sandro Fini, Milena |
author_facet | Veronesi, Francesca Cadossi, Matteo Giavaresi, Gianluca Martini, Lucia Setti, Stefania Buda, Roberto Giannini, Sandro Fini, Milena |
author_sort | Veronesi, Francesca |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The study aimed to evaluate the combined effect of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field (PEMF) biophysical stimulation and bone marrow concentrate (BMC) in osteochondral defect healing in comparison to the treatment with scaffold alone. METHODS: An osteochondral lesion of both knees was performed in ten rabbits. One was treated with a collagen scaffold alone and the other with scaffold seeded with BMC. Half of the animals were stimulated by PEMFs (75 Hz, 1.5 mT, 4 h/day) and at 40 d, macroscopic, histological and histomorphometric analyses were performed to evaluate osteochondral defect regeneration. RESULTS: Regarding cartilage, the addition of BMC to the scaffold improved cell parameters and the PEMF stimulation improved both cell and matrix parameters compared with scaffold alone. The combination of BMC and PEMFs further improved osteochondral regeneration: there was an improvement in macroscopic, cartilage cellularity and matrix parameters and a reduction in the percentage of cartilage under the tidemark. Epiphyseal bone healing improved in all the osteochondral defects regardless of treatment, although PEMFs alone did not significantly improve the reconstruction of subchondral bone in comparison to treatment with scaffold alone. CONCLUSIONS: Results show that BMC and PEMFs might have a separate effect on osteochondral regeneration, but it seems that they have a greater effect when used together. Biophysical stimulation is a non-invasive therapy, free from side effects and should be started soon after BMC transplantation to increase the quality of the regenerated tissue. However, because this is the first explorative study on the combination of a biological and a biophysical treatment for osteochondral regeneration, future preclinical and clinical research should be focused on this topic to explore mechanisms of action and the correct clinical translation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4557597 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45575972015-09-03 Pulsed electromagnetic fields combined with a collagenous scaffold and bone marrow concentrate enhance osteochondral regeneration: an in vivo study Veronesi, Francesca Cadossi, Matteo Giavaresi, Gianluca Martini, Lucia Setti, Stefania Buda, Roberto Giannini, Sandro Fini, Milena BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: The study aimed to evaluate the combined effect of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field (PEMF) biophysical stimulation and bone marrow concentrate (BMC) in osteochondral defect healing in comparison to the treatment with scaffold alone. METHODS: An osteochondral lesion of both knees was performed in ten rabbits. One was treated with a collagen scaffold alone and the other with scaffold seeded with BMC. Half of the animals were stimulated by PEMFs (75 Hz, 1.5 mT, 4 h/day) and at 40 d, macroscopic, histological and histomorphometric analyses were performed to evaluate osteochondral defect regeneration. RESULTS: Regarding cartilage, the addition of BMC to the scaffold improved cell parameters and the PEMF stimulation improved both cell and matrix parameters compared with scaffold alone. The combination of BMC and PEMFs further improved osteochondral regeneration: there was an improvement in macroscopic, cartilage cellularity and matrix parameters and a reduction in the percentage of cartilage under the tidemark. Epiphyseal bone healing improved in all the osteochondral defects regardless of treatment, although PEMFs alone did not significantly improve the reconstruction of subchondral bone in comparison to treatment with scaffold alone. CONCLUSIONS: Results show that BMC and PEMFs might have a separate effect on osteochondral regeneration, but it seems that they have a greater effect when used together. Biophysical stimulation is a non-invasive therapy, free from side effects and should be started soon after BMC transplantation to increase the quality of the regenerated tissue. However, because this is the first explorative study on the combination of a biological and a biophysical treatment for osteochondral regeneration, future preclinical and clinical research should be focused on this topic to explore mechanisms of action and the correct clinical translation. BioMed Central 2015-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4557597/ /pubmed/26328626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0683-2 Text en © Veronesi et al. 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Veronesi, Francesca Cadossi, Matteo Giavaresi, Gianluca Martini, Lucia Setti, Stefania Buda, Roberto Giannini, Sandro Fini, Milena Pulsed electromagnetic fields combined with a collagenous scaffold and bone marrow concentrate enhance osteochondral regeneration: an in vivo study |
title | Pulsed electromagnetic fields combined with a collagenous scaffold and bone marrow concentrate enhance osteochondral regeneration: an in vivo study |
title_full | Pulsed electromagnetic fields combined with a collagenous scaffold and bone marrow concentrate enhance osteochondral regeneration: an in vivo study |
title_fullStr | Pulsed electromagnetic fields combined with a collagenous scaffold and bone marrow concentrate enhance osteochondral regeneration: an in vivo study |
title_full_unstemmed | Pulsed electromagnetic fields combined with a collagenous scaffold and bone marrow concentrate enhance osteochondral regeneration: an in vivo study |
title_short | Pulsed electromagnetic fields combined with a collagenous scaffold and bone marrow concentrate enhance osteochondral regeneration: an in vivo study |
title_sort | pulsed electromagnetic fields combined with a collagenous scaffold and bone marrow concentrate enhance osteochondral regeneration: an in vivo study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4557597/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26328626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0683-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT veronesifrancesca pulsedelectromagneticfieldscombinedwithacollagenousscaffoldandbonemarrowconcentrateenhanceosteochondralregenerationaninvivostudy AT cadossimatteo pulsedelectromagneticfieldscombinedwithacollagenousscaffoldandbonemarrowconcentrateenhanceosteochondralregenerationaninvivostudy AT giavaresigianluca pulsedelectromagneticfieldscombinedwithacollagenousscaffoldandbonemarrowconcentrateenhanceosteochondralregenerationaninvivostudy AT martinilucia pulsedelectromagneticfieldscombinedwithacollagenousscaffoldandbonemarrowconcentrateenhanceosteochondralregenerationaninvivostudy AT settistefania pulsedelectromagneticfieldscombinedwithacollagenousscaffoldandbonemarrowconcentrateenhanceosteochondralregenerationaninvivostudy AT budaroberto pulsedelectromagneticfieldscombinedwithacollagenousscaffoldandbonemarrowconcentrateenhanceosteochondralregenerationaninvivostudy AT gianninisandro pulsedelectromagneticfieldscombinedwithacollagenousscaffoldandbonemarrowconcentrateenhanceosteochondralregenerationaninvivostudy AT finimilena pulsedelectromagneticfieldscombinedwithacollagenousscaffoldandbonemarrowconcentrateenhanceosteochondralregenerationaninvivostudy |