Cargando…

Evaluating the validity of an integrity-based situational judgement test for medical school admissions

BACKGROUND: While the construct of integrity has emerged as a front-runner amongst the desirable attributes to select for in medical school admissions, it is less clear how best to assess this characteristic. A potential solution lies in the use of Situational Judgement Tests (SJTs) which have gaine...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Husbands, Adrian, Rodgerson, Mark J., Dowell, Jon, Patterson, Fiona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4557748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26330210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0424-0
_version_ 1782388518707789824
author Husbands, Adrian
Rodgerson, Mark J.
Dowell, Jon
Patterson, Fiona
author_facet Husbands, Adrian
Rodgerson, Mark J.
Dowell, Jon
Patterson, Fiona
author_sort Husbands, Adrian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: While the construct of integrity has emerged as a front-runner amongst the desirable attributes to select for in medical school admissions, it is less clear how best to assess this characteristic. A potential solution lies in the use of Situational Judgement Tests (SJTs) which have gained popularity due to robust psychometric evidence and potential for large-scale administration. This study aims to explore the psychometric properties of an SJT designed to measure the construct of integrity. METHODS: Ten SJT scenarios, each with five response stems were developed from critical incident interviews with academic and clinical staff. 200 of 520 (38.5 %) Multiple Mini Interview candidates at Dundee Medical School participated in the study during the 2012–2013 admissions cycle. Participants were asked to rate the appropriateness of each SJT response on a 4-point likert scale as well as complete the HEXACO personality inventory and a face validity questionnaire. Pearson’s correlations and descriptive statistics were used to examine the associations between SJT score, HEXACO personality traits, pre-admissions measures namely academic and United Kingdom Clinical Aptitude Test (UKCAT) scores, as well as acceptability. RESULTS: Cronbach’s alpha reliability for the SJT was .64. Statistically significant correlations ranging from .16 to .36 (.22 to .53 disattenuated) were observed between SJT score and the honesty-humility (integrity), conscientiousness, extraversion and agreeableness  dimensions of the HEXACO inventory. A significant correlation of .32 (.47 disattenuated) was observed between SJT and MMI scores and no significant relationship with the UKCAT. Participant reactions to the SJTs were generally positive. CONCLUSIONS: Initial findings are encouraging regarding the psychometric robustness of an integrity-based SJT for medical student selection, with significant associations found between the SJTs, integrity, other desirable personality traits and the MMI. The SJTs showed little or no redundancy with cognitive ability. Results suggest that carefully-designed SJTs may augment more costly MMIs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4557748
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45577482015-09-03 Evaluating the validity of an integrity-based situational judgement test for medical school admissions Husbands, Adrian Rodgerson, Mark J. Dowell, Jon Patterson, Fiona BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: While the construct of integrity has emerged as a front-runner amongst the desirable attributes to select for in medical school admissions, it is less clear how best to assess this characteristic. A potential solution lies in the use of Situational Judgement Tests (SJTs) which have gained popularity due to robust psychometric evidence and potential for large-scale administration. This study aims to explore the psychometric properties of an SJT designed to measure the construct of integrity. METHODS: Ten SJT scenarios, each with five response stems were developed from critical incident interviews with academic and clinical staff. 200 of 520 (38.5 %) Multiple Mini Interview candidates at Dundee Medical School participated in the study during the 2012–2013 admissions cycle. Participants were asked to rate the appropriateness of each SJT response on a 4-point likert scale as well as complete the HEXACO personality inventory and a face validity questionnaire. Pearson’s correlations and descriptive statistics were used to examine the associations between SJT score, HEXACO personality traits, pre-admissions measures namely academic and United Kingdom Clinical Aptitude Test (UKCAT) scores, as well as acceptability. RESULTS: Cronbach’s alpha reliability for the SJT was .64. Statistically significant correlations ranging from .16 to .36 (.22 to .53 disattenuated) were observed between SJT score and the honesty-humility (integrity), conscientiousness, extraversion and agreeableness  dimensions of the HEXACO inventory. A significant correlation of .32 (.47 disattenuated) was observed between SJT and MMI scores and no significant relationship with the UKCAT. Participant reactions to the SJTs were generally positive. CONCLUSIONS: Initial findings are encouraging regarding the psychometric robustness of an integrity-based SJT for medical student selection, with significant associations found between the SJTs, integrity, other desirable personality traits and the MMI. The SJTs showed little or no redundancy with cognitive ability. Results suggest that carefully-designed SJTs may augment more costly MMIs. BioMed Central 2015-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4557748/ /pubmed/26330210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0424-0 Text en © Husbands et al. 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Husbands, Adrian
Rodgerson, Mark J.
Dowell, Jon
Patterson, Fiona
Evaluating the validity of an integrity-based situational judgement test for medical school admissions
title Evaluating the validity of an integrity-based situational judgement test for medical school admissions
title_full Evaluating the validity of an integrity-based situational judgement test for medical school admissions
title_fullStr Evaluating the validity of an integrity-based situational judgement test for medical school admissions
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the validity of an integrity-based situational judgement test for medical school admissions
title_short Evaluating the validity of an integrity-based situational judgement test for medical school admissions
title_sort evaluating the validity of an integrity-based situational judgement test for medical school admissions
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4557748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26330210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0424-0
work_keys_str_mv AT husbandsadrian evaluatingthevalidityofanintegritybasedsituationaljudgementtestformedicalschooladmissions
AT rodgersonmarkj evaluatingthevalidityofanintegritybasedsituationaljudgementtestformedicalschooladmissions
AT dowelljon evaluatingthevalidityofanintegritybasedsituationaljudgementtestformedicalschooladmissions
AT pattersonfiona evaluatingthevalidityofanintegritybasedsituationaljudgementtestformedicalschooladmissions