Cargando…

Preconceptions influence women’s perceptions of information on breast cancer screening: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND: Screening for breast cancer has been subject to intense debate in recent decades regarding benefits and risks. Participation in breast cancer screening should be based on informed choice, and most countries approach this by sending information leaflets with invitations to attend screenin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Henriksen, Mikael Johannes Vuokko, Guassora, Ann Dorrit, Brodersen, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4557860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26336075
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1327-1
_version_ 1782388531699646464
author Henriksen, Mikael Johannes Vuokko
Guassora, Ann Dorrit
Brodersen, John
author_facet Henriksen, Mikael Johannes Vuokko
Guassora, Ann Dorrit
Brodersen, John
author_sort Henriksen, Mikael Johannes Vuokko
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Screening for breast cancer has been subject to intense debate in recent decades regarding benefits and risks. Participation in breast cancer screening should be based on informed choice, and most countries approach this by sending information leaflets with invitations to attend screening. However, very little attention has been paid to the decision-making process and how the information leaflets are used and understood by women. The aim of this study is twofold. First, we use a theoretical framework to explore how the framing of information influences the intention to participate in breast cancer screening. Second, we discuss how information and attitudes held prior to receiving the invitation influence the perception of the balance between the benefits and risks harms of screening. METHODS: We used a qualitative design and interviewed six women who were soon to receive their first invitation to participate in the breast screening programme in Denmark. The selected women received a copy of the official information leaflet 1 week before we interviewed them. The six women were interviewed individually using an interview guide based on the theory of planned behaviour. We used meaning condensation for our initial analysis, and further analysis was guided by the theory of cognitive dissonance. RESULTS: For our participants, the decision-making process was dominated by the attitudes of the women’s circle of acquaintances and, to a lesser extent, by the information that accompanied the screening invitation. Information that conflicted with attitudes the women already held was actively disregarded. The risk of overdiagnosis as a potentially harmful effect of participation in mammography screening was unknown to the women in our study. An isolated framing effect was not found. CONCLUSION: Women have expectations about breast cancer screening that are formed before they receive information from the screening programme. These expectations compromise the perception of balance between screening benefits and potential harmful effects. They also influence the perception of the information in the breast screening leaflet. The phenomenon of overdiagnosis is unknown to the women.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4557860
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45578602015-09-03 Preconceptions influence women’s perceptions of information on breast cancer screening: a qualitative study Henriksen, Mikael Johannes Vuokko Guassora, Ann Dorrit Brodersen, John BMC Res Notes Research Article BACKGROUND: Screening for breast cancer has been subject to intense debate in recent decades regarding benefits and risks. Participation in breast cancer screening should be based on informed choice, and most countries approach this by sending information leaflets with invitations to attend screening. However, very little attention has been paid to the decision-making process and how the information leaflets are used and understood by women. The aim of this study is twofold. First, we use a theoretical framework to explore how the framing of information influences the intention to participate in breast cancer screening. Second, we discuss how information and attitudes held prior to receiving the invitation influence the perception of the balance between the benefits and risks harms of screening. METHODS: We used a qualitative design and interviewed six women who were soon to receive their first invitation to participate in the breast screening programme in Denmark. The selected women received a copy of the official information leaflet 1 week before we interviewed them. The six women were interviewed individually using an interview guide based on the theory of planned behaviour. We used meaning condensation for our initial analysis, and further analysis was guided by the theory of cognitive dissonance. RESULTS: For our participants, the decision-making process was dominated by the attitudes of the women’s circle of acquaintances and, to a lesser extent, by the information that accompanied the screening invitation. Information that conflicted with attitudes the women already held was actively disregarded. The risk of overdiagnosis as a potentially harmful effect of participation in mammography screening was unknown to the women in our study. An isolated framing effect was not found. CONCLUSION: Women have expectations about breast cancer screening that are formed before they receive information from the screening programme. These expectations compromise the perception of balance between screening benefits and potential harmful effects. They also influence the perception of the information in the breast screening leaflet. The phenomenon of overdiagnosis is unknown to the women. BioMed Central 2015-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4557860/ /pubmed/26336075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1327-1 Text en © Henriksen et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Henriksen, Mikael Johannes Vuokko
Guassora, Ann Dorrit
Brodersen, John
Preconceptions influence women’s perceptions of information on breast cancer screening: a qualitative study
title Preconceptions influence women’s perceptions of information on breast cancer screening: a qualitative study
title_full Preconceptions influence women’s perceptions of information on breast cancer screening: a qualitative study
title_fullStr Preconceptions influence women’s perceptions of information on breast cancer screening: a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Preconceptions influence women’s perceptions of information on breast cancer screening: a qualitative study
title_short Preconceptions influence women’s perceptions of information on breast cancer screening: a qualitative study
title_sort preconceptions influence women’s perceptions of information on breast cancer screening: a qualitative study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4557860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26336075
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1327-1
work_keys_str_mv AT henriksenmikaeljohannesvuokko preconceptionsinfluencewomensperceptionsofinformationonbreastcancerscreeningaqualitativestudy
AT guassoraanndorrit preconceptionsinfluencewomensperceptionsofinformationonbreastcancerscreeningaqualitativestudy
AT brodersenjohn preconceptionsinfluencewomensperceptionsofinformationonbreastcancerscreeningaqualitativestudy