Cargando…

A-Part Gel, an adhesion prophylaxis for abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled phase I–II safety study [NCT00646412]

BACKGROUND: Intra-abdominal surgical intervention can cause the development of intra-peritoneal adhesions. To reduce this problem, different agents have been tested to minimize abdominal adhesions; however, the optimal adhesion prophylaxis has not been found so far. Therefore, the A-Part(®) Gel was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lang, Reinhold, Baumann, Petra, Schmoor, Claudia, Odermatt, Erich K., Wente, Moritz N., Jauch, Karl-Walter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4557926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26336510
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13022-015-0014-1
_version_ 1782388540398632960
author Lang, Reinhold
Baumann, Petra
Schmoor, Claudia
Odermatt, Erich K.
Wente, Moritz N.
Jauch, Karl-Walter
author_facet Lang, Reinhold
Baumann, Petra
Schmoor, Claudia
Odermatt, Erich K.
Wente, Moritz N.
Jauch, Karl-Walter
author_sort Lang, Reinhold
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Intra-abdominal surgical intervention can cause the development of intra-peritoneal adhesions. To reduce this problem, different agents have been tested to minimize abdominal adhesions; however, the optimal adhesion prophylaxis has not been found so far. Therefore, the A-Part(®) Gel was developed as a barrier to diminish postsurgical adhesions; the aim of this randomized controlled study was a first evaluation of its safety and efficacy. METHODS: In this prospective, controlled, randomized, patient-blinded, monocenter phase I–II study, 62 patients received either the hydrogel A-Part-Gel(®) as an anti-adhesive barrier or were untreated after primary elective median laparotomy. Primary endpoint was the occurrence of peritonitis and/or wound healing impairment 28 ± 10 days postoperatively. As secondary endpoints anastomotic leakage until 28 days after surgery, adverse events and adhesions were assessed until 3 months postoperatively. RESULTS: A lower rate of wound healing impairment and/or peritonitis was observed in the A-Part Gel(®) group compared to the control group: (6.5 vs. 13.8 %). The difference between the two groups was −7.3%, 90 % confidence interval [−20.1, 5.4 %]. Both treatment groups showed similar frequency of anastomotic leakage but incidence of adverse events and serious adverse events were slightly lower in the A-Part Gel(®) group compared to the control. Adhesion rates were comparable in both groups. CONCLUSION: A-Part Gel(®) is safe as an adhesion prophylaxis after abdominal wall surgery but no reduction of postoperative peritoneal adhesion could be found in comparison to the control group. This may at least in part be due to the small sample size as well as to the incomplete coverage of the incision due to the used application. Trial Registration: NCT00646412
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4557926
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45579262015-09-03 A-Part Gel, an adhesion prophylaxis for abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled phase I–II safety study [NCT00646412] Lang, Reinhold Baumann, Petra Schmoor, Claudia Odermatt, Erich K. Wente, Moritz N. Jauch, Karl-Walter Ann Surg Innov Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Intra-abdominal surgical intervention can cause the development of intra-peritoneal adhesions. To reduce this problem, different agents have been tested to minimize abdominal adhesions; however, the optimal adhesion prophylaxis has not been found so far. Therefore, the A-Part(®) Gel was developed as a barrier to diminish postsurgical adhesions; the aim of this randomized controlled study was a first evaluation of its safety and efficacy. METHODS: In this prospective, controlled, randomized, patient-blinded, monocenter phase I–II study, 62 patients received either the hydrogel A-Part-Gel(®) as an anti-adhesive barrier or were untreated after primary elective median laparotomy. Primary endpoint was the occurrence of peritonitis and/or wound healing impairment 28 ± 10 days postoperatively. As secondary endpoints anastomotic leakage until 28 days after surgery, adverse events and adhesions were assessed until 3 months postoperatively. RESULTS: A lower rate of wound healing impairment and/or peritonitis was observed in the A-Part Gel(®) group compared to the control group: (6.5 vs. 13.8 %). The difference between the two groups was −7.3%, 90 % confidence interval [−20.1, 5.4 %]. Both treatment groups showed similar frequency of anastomotic leakage but incidence of adverse events and serious adverse events were slightly lower in the A-Part Gel(®) group compared to the control. Adhesion rates were comparable in both groups. CONCLUSION: A-Part Gel(®) is safe as an adhesion prophylaxis after abdominal wall surgery but no reduction of postoperative peritoneal adhesion could be found in comparison to the control group. This may at least in part be due to the small sample size as well as to the incomplete coverage of the incision due to the used application. Trial Registration: NCT00646412 BioMed Central 2015-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4557926/ /pubmed/26336510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13022-015-0014-1 Text en © Lang et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lang, Reinhold
Baumann, Petra
Schmoor, Claudia
Odermatt, Erich K.
Wente, Moritz N.
Jauch, Karl-Walter
A-Part Gel, an adhesion prophylaxis for abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled phase I–II safety study [NCT00646412]
title A-Part Gel, an adhesion prophylaxis for abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled phase I–II safety study [NCT00646412]
title_full A-Part Gel, an adhesion prophylaxis for abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled phase I–II safety study [NCT00646412]
title_fullStr A-Part Gel, an adhesion prophylaxis for abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled phase I–II safety study [NCT00646412]
title_full_unstemmed A-Part Gel, an adhesion prophylaxis for abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled phase I–II safety study [NCT00646412]
title_short A-Part Gel, an adhesion prophylaxis for abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled phase I–II safety study [NCT00646412]
title_sort a-part gel, an adhesion prophylaxis for abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled phase i–ii safety study [nct00646412]
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4557926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26336510
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13022-015-0014-1
work_keys_str_mv AT langreinhold apartgelanadhesionprophylaxisforabdominalsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledphaseiiisafetystudynct00646412
AT baumannpetra apartgelanadhesionprophylaxisforabdominalsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledphaseiiisafetystudynct00646412
AT schmoorclaudia apartgelanadhesionprophylaxisforabdominalsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledphaseiiisafetystudynct00646412
AT odermatterichk apartgelanadhesionprophylaxisforabdominalsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledphaseiiisafetystudynct00646412
AT wentemoritzn apartgelanadhesionprophylaxisforabdominalsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledphaseiiisafetystudynct00646412
AT jauchkarlwalter apartgelanadhesionprophylaxisforabdominalsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledphaseiiisafetystudynct00646412