Cargando…

Geckos as Springs: Mechanics Explain Across-Species Scaling of Adhesion

One of the central controversies regarding the evolution of adhesion concerns how adhesive force scales as animals change in size, either among or within species. A widely held view is that as animals become larger, the primary mechanism that enables them to climb is increasing pad area. However, pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gilman, Casey A., Imburgia, Michael J., Bartlett, Michael D., King, Daniel R., Crosby, Alfred J., Irschick, Duncan J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4558017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26331621
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134604
_version_ 1782388558244347904
author Gilman, Casey A.
Imburgia, Michael J.
Bartlett, Michael D.
King, Daniel R.
Crosby, Alfred J.
Irschick, Duncan J.
author_facet Gilman, Casey A.
Imburgia, Michael J.
Bartlett, Michael D.
King, Daniel R.
Crosby, Alfred J.
Irschick, Duncan J.
author_sort Gilman, Casey A.
collection PubMed
description One of the central controversies regarding the evolution of adhesion concerns how adhesive force scales as animals change in size, either among or within species. A widely held view is that as animals become larger, the primary mechanism that enables them to climb is increasing pad area. However, prior studies show that much of the variation in maximum adhesive force remains unexplained, even when area is accounted for. We tested the hypothesis that maximum adhesive force among pad-bearing gecko species is not solely dictated by toepad area, but also depends on the ratio of toepad area to gecko adhesive system compliance in the loading direction, where compliance (C) is the change in extension (Δ) relative to a change in force (F) while loading a gecko’s adhesive system (C = dΔ/dF). Geckos are well-known for their ability to climb on a range of vertical and overhanging surfaces, and range in mass from several grams to over 300 grams, yet little is understood of the factors that enable adhesion to scale with body size. We examined the maximum adhesive force of six gecko species that vary in body size (~2–100 g). We also examined changes between juveniles and adults within a single species (Phelsuma grandis). We found that maximum adhesive force and toepad area increased with increasing gecko size, and that as gecko species become larger, their adhesive systems become significantly less compliant. Additionally, our hypothesis was supported, as the best predictor of maximum adhesive force was not toepad area or compliance alone, but the ratio of toepad area to compliance. We verified this result using a synthetic “model gecko” system comprised of synthetic adhesive pads attached to a glass substrate and a synthetic tendon (mechanical spring) of finite stiffness. Our data indicate that increases in toepad area as geckos become larger cannot fully account for increased adhesive abilities, and decreased compliance must be included to explain the scaling of adhesion in animals with dry adhesion systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4558017
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45580172015-09-10 Geckos as Springs: Mechanics Explain Across-Species Scaling of Adhesion Gilman, Casey A. Imburgia, Michael J. Bartlett, Michael D. King, Daniel R. Crosby, Alfred J. Irschick, Duncan J. PLoS One Research Article One of the central controversies regarding the evolution of adhesion concerns how adhesive force scales as animals change in size, either among or within species. A widely held view is that as animals become larger, the primary mechanism that enables them to climb is increasing pad area. However, prior studies show that much of the variation in maximum adhesive force remains unexplained, even when area is accounted for. We tested the hypothesis that maximum adhesive force among pad-bearing gecko species is not solely dictated by toepad area, but also depends on the ratio of toepad area to gecko adhesive system compliance in the loading direction, where compliance (C) is the change in extension (Δ) relative to a change in force (F) while loading a gecko’s adhesive system (C = dΔ/dF). Geckos are well-known for their ability to climb on a range of vertical and overhanging surfaces, and range in mass from several grams to over 300 grams, yet little is understood of the factors that enable adhesion to scale with body size. We examined the maximum adhesive force of six gecko species that vary in body size (~2–100 g). We also examined changes between juveniles and adults within a single species (Phelsuma grandis). We found that maximum adhesive force and toepad area increased with increasing gecko size, and that as gecko species become larger, their adhesive systems become significantly less compliant. Additionally, our hypothesis was supported, as the best predictor of maximum adhesive force was not toepad area or compliance alone, but the ratio of toepad area to compliance. We verified this result using a synthetic “model gecko” system comprised of synthetic adhesive pads attached to a glass substrate and a synthetic tendon (mechanical spring) of finite stiffness. Our data indicate that increases in toepad area as geckos become larger cannot fully account for increased adhesive abilities, and decreased compliance must be included to explain the scaling of adhesion in animals with dry adhesion systems. Public Library of Science 2015-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4558017/ /pubmed/26331621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134604 Text en © 2015 Gilman et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gilman, Casey A.
Imburgia, Michael J.
Bartlett, Michael D.
King, Daniel R.
Crosby, Alfred J.
Irschick, Duncan J.
Geckos as Springs: Mechanics Explain Across-Species Scaling of Adhesion
title Geckos as Springs: Mechanics Explain Across-Species Scaling of Adhesion
title_full Geckos as Springs: Mechanics Explain Across-Species Scaling of Adhesion
title_fullStr Geckos as Springs: Mechanics Explain Across-Species Scaling of Adhesion
title_full_unstemmed Geckos as Springs: Mechanics Explain Across-Species Scaling of Adhesion
title_short Geckos as Springs: Mechanics Explain Across-Species Scaling of Adhesion
title_sort geckos as springs: mechanics explain across-species scaling of adhesion
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4558017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26331621
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134604
work_keys_str_mv AT gilmancaseya geckosasspringsmechanicsexplainacrossspeciesscalingofadhesion
AT imburgiamichaelj geckosasspringsmechanicsexplainacrossspeciesscalingofadhesion
AT bartlettmichaeld geckosasspringsmechanicsexplainacrossspeciesscalingofadhesion
AT kingdanielr geckosasspringsmechanicsexplainacrossspeciesscalingofadhesion
AT crosbyalfredj geckosasspringsmechanicsexplainacrossspeciesscalingofadhesion
AT irschickduncanj geckosasspringsmechanicsexplainacrossspeciesscalingofadhesion