Cargando…

Timing and Risk Factors for a Positive Fecal Immunochemical Test in Subsequent Screening for Colorectal Neoplasms

BACKGROUND: Following a negative test, the performance of fecal immunochemical testing in the subsequent screening round is rarely reported. It is crucial to allocate resources to participants who are more likely to test positive subsequently following an initial negative result. OBJECTIVE: To ident...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chiang, Tsung-Hsien, Lee, Yi-Chia, Liao, Wan-Chung, Chung, Jui-Hung, Chiu, Han-Mo, Tu, Chia-Hung, Chen, Su-Chiu, Wu, Ming-Shiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4558044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26332318
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136890
_version_ 1782388564417314816
author Chiang, Tsung-Hsien
Lee, Yi-Chia
Liao, Wan-Chung
Chung, Jui-Hung
Chiu, Han-Mo
Tu, Chia-Hung
Chen, Su-Chiu
Wu, Ming-Shiang
author_facet Chiang, Tsung-Hsien
Lee, Yi-Chia
Liao, Wan-Chung
Chung, Jui-Hung
Chiu, Han-Mo
Tu, Chia-Hung
Chen, Su-Chiu
Wu, Ming-Shiang
author_sort Chiang, Tsung-Hsien
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Following a negative test, the performance of fecal immunochemical testing in the subsequent screening round is rarely reported. It is crucial to allocate resources to participants who are more likely to test positive subsequently following an initial negative result. OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors associated with a positive result in subsequent screening. METHODS: Dataset was composed of consecutive participants who voluntarily underwent fecal tests and colonoscopy in a routine medical examination at the National Taiwan University Hospital between January 2007 and December 2011. Risk factor assessment of positive fecal test in subsequent screening was performed by using the Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Our cohort consisted of 3783 participants during a 5-year period. In three rounds of subsequent testing, 3783, 1537, and 624 participants underwent fecal tests, respectively; 5.7%, 5.1%, and 3.9% tested positive, respectively, and the positive predictive values were 40.2%, 20.3%, and 20.8%, respectively. Age ≥60 years (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.21–1.93) and male gender (1.32, 95% CI: 1.02–1.69) were risk factors; however, an interaction between age and gender was noted. Men had higher risk than women when they were <60 years of age (p = 0.002), while this difference was no longer observed when ≥60 years of age (p = 0.74). The optimal interval of screening timing for participant with baseline negative fecal test was 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Following a negative test, older age and male gender are risk factors for a positive result in the subsequent rounds while the gender difference diminishes with age. Biennial screening is sufficient following a negative fecal test.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4558044
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45580442015-09-10 Timing and Risk Factors for a Positive Fecal Immunochemical Test in Subsequent Screening for Colorectal Neoplasms Chiang, Tsung-Hsien Lee, Yi-Chia Liao, Wan-Chung Chung, Jui-Hung Chiu, Han-Mo Tu, Chia-Hung Chen, Su-Chiu Wu, Ming-Shiang PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Following a negative test, the performance of fecal immunochemical testing in the subsequent screening round is rarely reported. It is crucial to allocate resources to participants who are more likely to test positive subsequently following an initial negative result. OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors associated with a positive result in subsequent screening. METHODS: Dataset was composed of consecutive participants who voluntarily underwent fecal tests and colonoscopy in a routine medical examination at the National Taiwan University Hospital between January 2007 and December 2011. Risk factor assessment of positive fecal test in subsequent screening was performed by using the Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Our cohort consisted of 3783 participants during a 5-year period. In three rounds of subsequent testing, 3783, 1537, and 624 participants underwent fecal tests, respectively; 5.7%, 5.1%, and 3.9% tested positive, respectively, and the positive predictive values were 40.2%, 20.3%, and 20.8%, respectively. Age ≥60 years (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.21–1.93) and male gender (1.32, 95% CI: 1.02–1.69) were risk factors; however, an interaction between age and gender was noted. Men had higher risk than women when they were <60 years of age (p = 0.002), while this difference was no longer observed when ≥60 years of age (p = 0.74). The optimal interval of screening timing for participant with baseline negative fecal test was 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Following a negative test, older age and male gender are risk factors for a positive result in the subsequent rounds while the gender difference diminishes with age. Biennial screening is sufficient following a negative fecal test. Public Library of Science 2015-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4558044/ /pubmed/26332318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136890 Text en © 2015 Chiang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chiang, Tsung-Hsien
Lee, Yi-Chia
Liao, Wan-Chung
Chung, Jui-Hung
Chiu, Han-Mo
Tu, Chia-Hung
Chen, Su-Chiu
Wu, Ming-Shiang
Timing and Risk Factors for a Positive Fecal Immunochemical Test in Subsequent Screening for Colorectal Neoplasms
title Timing and Risk Factors for a Positive Fecal Immunochemical Test in Subsequent Screening for Colorectal Neoplasms
title_full Timing and Risk Factors for a Positive Fecal Immunochemical Test in Subsequent Screening for Colorectal Neoplasms
title_fullStr Timing and Risk Factors for a Positive Fecal Immunochemical Test in Subsequent Screening for Colorectal Neoplasms
title_full_unstemmed Timing and Risk Factors for a Positive Fecal Immunochemical Test in Subsequent Screening for Colorectal Neoplasms
title_short Timing and Risk Factors for a Positive Fecal Immunochemical Test in Subsequent Screening for Colorectal Neoplasms
title_sort timing and risk factors for a positive fecal immunochemical test in subsequent screening for colorectal neoplasms
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4558044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26332318
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136890
work_keys_str_mv AT chiangtsunghsien timingandriskfactorsforapositivefecalimmunochemicaltestinsubsequentscreeningforcolorectalneoplasms
AT leeyichia timingandriskfactorsforapositivefecalimmunochemicaltestinsubsequentscreeningforcolorectalneoplasms
AT liaowanchung timingandriskfactorsforapositivefecalimmunochemicaltestinsubsequentscreeningforcolorectalneoplasms
AT chungjuihung timingandriskfactorsforapositivefecalimmunochemicaltestinsubsequentscreeningforcolorectalneoplasms
AT chiuhanmo timingandriskfactorsforapositivefecalimmunochemicaltestinsubsequentscreeningforcolorectalneoplasms
AT tuchiahung timingandriskfactorsforapositivefecalimmunochemicaltestinsubsequentscreeningforcolorectalneoplasms
AT chensuchiu timingandriskfactorsforapositivefecalimmunochemicaltestinsubsequentscreeningforcolorectalneoplasms
AT wumingshiang timingandriskfactorsforapositivefecalimmunochemicaltestinsubsequentscreeningforcolorectalneoplasms