Cargando…

RAS testing in metastatic colorectal cancer: excellent reproducibility amongst 17 Dutch pathology centers

In 2013 the European Medicine Agency (EMA) restricted the indication for anti-EGFR targeted therapy to metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with a wild-type RAS gene, increasing the need for reliable RAS mutation testing. We evaluated the completeness and reproducibility of RAS-testing in the Netherl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boleij, Annemarie, Tops, Bastiaan B.J., Rombout, Paul D.M., Dequeker, Elizabeth M., Ligtenberg, Marjolijn J.L., van Krieken, J. Han
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4558179/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25944693
_version_ 1782388594037489664
author Boleij, Annemarie
Tops, Bastiaan B.J.
Rombout, Paul D.M.
Dequeker, Elizabeth M.
Ligtenberg, Marjolijn J.L.
van Krieken, J. Han
author_facet Boleij, Annemarie
Tops, Bastiaan B.J.
Rombout, Paul D.M.
Dequeker, Elizabeth M.
Ligtenberg, Marjolijn J.L.
van Krieken, J. Han
author_sort Boleij, Annemarie
collection PubMed
description In 2013 the European Medicine Agency (EMA) restricted the indication for anti-EGFR targeted therapy to metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with a wild-type RAS gene, increasing the need for reliable RAS mutation testing. We evaluated the completeness and reproducibility of RAS-testing in the Netherlands. From 17 laboratories, tumor DNA of the first 10 CRC cases tested in 2014 in routine clinical practice was re-tested by a reference laboratory using a custom next generation sequencing panel. In total, 171 CRC cases were re-evaluated for hotspot mutations in KRAS, NRAS and BRAF. Most laboratories had introduced complete RAS-testing (65%) and BRAF-testing (71%) by January 2014. The most employed method for all hotspot regions was Sanger sequencing (range 35.7 – 49.2%). The reference laboratory detected all mutations that had been found in the participating laboratories (n = 92), plus 10 additional mutations. This concerned three RAS and seven BRAF mutations that were missed due to incomplete testing of the participating laboratory. Overall, the concordance of tests performed by both the reference and participating laboratory was 100% (163/163; κ-static 1.0) for RAS and 100% (144/144; κ-static 1.0) for BRAF. Our study shows that RAS and BRAF mutations can be reproducibly assessed using a variety of testing methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4558179
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45581792015-09-09 RAS testing in metastatic colorectal cancer: excellent reproducibility amongst 17 Dutch pathology centers Boleij, Annemarie Tops, Bastiaan B.J. Rombout, Paul D.M. Dequeker, Elizabeth M. Ligtenberg, Marjolijn J.L. van Krieken, J. Han Oncotarget Clinical Research Paper In 2013 the European Medicine Agency (EMA) restricted the indication for anti-EGFR targeted therapy to metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with a wild-type RAS gene, increasing the need for reliable RAS mutation testing. We evaluated the completeness and reproducibility of RAS-testing in the Netherlands. From 17 laboratories, tumor DNA of the first 10 CRC cases tested in 2014 in routine clinical practice was re-tested by a reference laboratory using a custom next generation sequencing panel. In total, 171 CRC cases were re-evaluated for hotspot mutations in KRAS, NRAS and BRAF. Most laboratories had introduced complete RAS-testing (65%) and BRAF-testing (71%) by January 2014. The most employed method for all hotspot regions was Sanger sequencing (range 35.7 – 49.2%). The reference laboratory detected all mutations that had been found in the participating laboratories (n = 92), plus 10 additional mutations. This concerned three RAS and seven BRAF mutations that were missed due to incomplete testing of the participating laboratory. Overall, the concordance of tests performed by both the reference and participating laboratory was 100% (163/163; κ-static 1.0) for RAS and 100% (144/144; κ-static 1.0) for BRAF. Our study shows that RAS and BRAF mutations can be reproducibly assessed using a variety of testing methods. Impact Journals LLC 2015-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4558179/ /pubmed/25944693 Text en Copyright: © 2015 Boleij et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Clinical Research Paper
Boleij, Annemarie
Tops, Bastiaan B.J.
Rombout, Paul D.M.
Dequeker, Elizabeth M.
Ligtenberg, Marjolijn J.L.
van Krieken, J. Han
RAS testing in metastatic colorectal cancer: excellent reproducibility amongst 17 Dutch pathology centers
title RAS testing in metastatic colorectal cancer: excellent reproducibility amongst 17 Dutch pathology centers
title_full RAS testing in metastatic colorectal cancer: excellent reproducibility amongst 17 Dutch pathology centers
title_fullStr RAS testing in metastatic colorectal cancer: excellent reproducibility amongst 17 Dutch pathology centers
title_full_unstemmed RAS testing in metastatic colorectal cancer: excellent reproducibility amongst 17 Dutch pathology centers
title_short RAS testing in metastatic colorectal cancer: excellent reproducibility amongst 17 Dutch pathology centers
title_sort ras testing in metastatic colorectal cancer: excellent reproducibility amongst 17 dutch pathology centers
topic Clinical Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4558179/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25944693
work_keys_str_mv AT boleijannemarie rastestinginmetastaticcolorectalcancerexcellentreproducibilityamongst17dutchpathologycenters
AT topsbastiaanbj rastestinginmetastaticcolorectalcancerexcellentreproducibilityamongst17dutchpathologycenters
AT romboutpauldm rastestinginmetastaticcolorectalcancerexcellentreproducibilityamongst17dutchpathologycenters
AT dequekerelizabethm rastestinginmetastaticcolorectalcancerexcellentreproducibilityamongst17dutchpathologycenters
AT ligtenbergmarjolijnjl rastestinginmetastaticcolorectalcancerexcellentreproducibilityamongst17dutchpathologycenters
AT vankriekenjhan rastestinginmetastaticcolorectalcancerexcellentreproducibilityamongst17dutchpathologycenters
AT rastestinginmetastaticcolorectalcancerexcellentreproducibilityamongst17dutchpathologycenters