Cargando…
RAS testing in metastatic colorectal cancer: excellent reproducibility amongst 17 Dutch pathology centers
In 2013 the European Medicine Agency (EMA) restricted the indication for anti-EGFR targeted therapy to metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with a wild-type RAS gene, increasing the need for reliable RAS mutation testing. We evaluated the completeness and reproducibility of RAS-testing in the Netherl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Impact Journals LLC
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4558179/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25944693 |
_version_ | 1782388594037489664 |
---|---|
author | Boleij, Annemarie Tops, Bastiaan B.J. Rombout, Paul D.M. Dequeker, Elizabeth M. Ligtenberg, Marjolijn J.L. van Krieken, J. Han |
author_facet | Boleij, Annemarie Tops, Bastiaan B.J. Rombout, Paul D.M. Dequeker, Elizabeth M. Ligtenberg, Marjolijn J.L. van Krieken, J. Han |
author_sort | Boleij, Annemarie |
collection | PubMed |
description | In 2013 the European Medicine Agency (EMA) restricted the indication for anti-EGFR targeted therapy to metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with a wild-type RAS gene, increasing the need for reliable RAS mutation testing. We evaluated the completeness and reproducibility of RAS-testing in the Netherlands. From 17 laboratories, tumor DNA of the first 10 CRC cases tested in 2014 in routine clinical practice was re-tested by a reference laboratory using a custom next generation sequencing panel. In total, 171 CRC cases were re-evaluated for hotspot mutations in KRAS, NRAS and BRAF. Most laboratories had introduced complete RAS-testing (65%) and BRAF-testing (71%) by January 2014. The most employed method for all hotspot regions was Sanger sequencing (range 35.7 – 49.2%). The reference laboratory detected all mutations that had been found in the participating laboratories (n = 92), plus 10 additional mutations. This concerned three RAS and seven BRAF mutations that were missed due to incomplete testing of the participating laboratory. Overall, the concordance of tests performed by both the reference and participating laboratory was 100% (163/163; κ-static 1.0) for RAS and 100% (144/144; κ-static 1.0) for BRAF. Our study shows that RAS and BRAF mutations can be reproducibly assessed using a variety of testing methods. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4558179 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Impact Journals LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45581792015-09-09 RAS testing in metastatic colorectal cancer: excellent reproducibility amongst 17 Dutch pathology centers Boleij, Annemarie Tops, Bastiaan B.J. Rombout, Paul D.M. Dequeker, Elizabeth M. Ligtenberg, Marjolijn J.L. van Krieken, J. Han Oncotarget Clinical Research Paper In 2013 the European Medicine Agency (EMA) restricted the indication for anti-EGFR targeted therapy to metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with a wild-type RAS gene, increasing the need for reliable RAS mutation testing. We evaluated the completeness and reproducibility of RAS-testing in the Netherlands. From 17 laboratories, tumor DNA of the first 10 CRC cases tested in 2014 in routine clinical practice was re-tested by a reference laboratory using a custom next generation sequencing panel. In total, 171 CRC cases were re-evaluated for hotspot mutations in KRAS, NRAS and BRAF. Most laboratories had introduced complete RAS-testing (65%) and BRAF-testing (71%) by January 2014. The most employed method for all hotspot regions was Sanger sequencing (range 35.7 – 49.2%). The reference laboratory detected all mutations that had been found in the participating laboratories (n = 92), plus 10 additional mutations. This concerned three RAS and seven BRAF mutations that were missed due to incomplete testing of the participating laboratory. Overall, the concordance of tests performed by both the reference and participating laboratory was 100% (163/163; κ-static 1.0) for RAS and 100% (144/144; κ-static 1.0) for BRAF. Our study shows that RAS and BRAF mutations can be reproducibly assessed using a variety of testing methods. Impact Journals LLC 2015-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4558179/ /pubmed/25944693 Text en Copyright: © 2015 Boleij et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Paper Boleij, Annemarie Tops, Bastiaan B.J. Rombout, Paul D.M. Dequeker, Elizabeth M. Ligtenberg, Marjolijn J.L. van Krieken, J. Han RAS testing in metastatic colorectal cancer: excellent reproducibility amongst 17 Dutch pathology centers |
title | RAS testing in metastatic colorectal cancer: excellent reproducibility amongst 17 Dutch pathology centers |
title_full | RAS testing in metastatic colorectal cancer: excellent reproducibility amongst 17 Dutch pathology centers |
title_fullStr | RAS testing in metastatic colorectal cancer: excellent reproducibility amongst 17 Dutch pathology centers |
title_full_unstemmed | RAS testing in metastatic colorectal cancer: excellent reproducibility amongst 17 Dutch pathology centers |
title_short | RAS testing in metastatic colorectal cancer: excellent reproducibility amongst 17 Dutch pathology centers |
title_sort | ras testing in metastatic colorectal cancer: excellent reproducibility amongst 17 dutch pathology centers |
topic | Clinical Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4558179/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25944693 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boleijannemarie rastestinginmetastaticcolorectalcancerexcellentreproducibilityamongst17dutchpathologycenters AT topsbastiaanbj rastestinginmetastaticcolorectalcancerexcellentreproducibilityamongst17dutchpathologycenters AT romboutpauldm rastestinginmetastaticcolorectalcancerexcellentreproducibilityamongst17dutchpathologycenters AT dequekerelizabethm rastestinginmetastaticcolorectalcancerexcellentreproducibilityamongst17dutchpathologycenters AT ligtenbergmarjolijnjl rastestinginmetastaticcolorectalcancerexcellentreproducibilityamongst17dutchpathologycenters AT vankriekenjhan rastestinginmetastaticcolorectalcancerexcellentreproducibilityamongst17dutchpathologycenters AT rastestinginmetastaticcolorectalcancerexcellentreproducibilityamongst17dutchpathologycenters |