Cargando…

Systematic reviews of complementary therapies – an annotated bibliography. Part 3: Homeopathy

BACKGROUND: Complementary therapies are widespread but controversial. We aim to provide a comprehensive collection and a summary of systematic reviews of clinical trials in three major complementary therapies (acupuncture, herbal medicine, homeopathy). This article is dealing with homeopathy. Potent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Linde, Klaus, Hondras, Maria, Vickers, Andrew, Riet, Gerben ter, Melchart, Dieter
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2001
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC45586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11527508
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-1-4
_version_ 1782120024778997760
author Linde, Klaus
Hondras, Maria
Vickers, Andrew
Riet, Gerben ter
Melchart, Dieter
author_facet Linde, Klaus
Hondras, Maria
Vickers, Andrew
Riet, Gerben ter
Melchart, Dieter
author_sort Linde, Klaus
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Complementary therapies are widespread but controversial. We aim to provide a comprehensive collection and a summary of systematic reviews of clinical trials in three major complementary therapies (acupuncture, herbal medicine, homeopathy). This article is dealing with homeopathy. Potentially relevant reviews were searched through the register of the Cochrane Complementary Medicine Field, the Cochrane Library, Medline, and bibliographies of articles and books. To be included articles had to review prospective clinical trials of homeopathy; had to describe review methods explicitly; had to be published; and had to focus on treatment effects. Information on conditions, interventions, methods, results and conclusions was extracted using a pretested form and summarized descriptively. RESULTS: Eighteen out of 22 potentially relevant reviews preselected in the screening process met the inclusion criteria. Six reviews addressed the question whether homeopathy is effective across conditions and interventions. The majority of available trials seem to report positive results but the evidence is not convincing. For isopathic nosodes for allergic conditions, oscillococcinum for influenza-like syndromes and galphimia for pollinosis the evidence is promising while in other areas reviewed the results are equivocal. INTERPRETATION: Reviews on homeopathy often address general questions. While the evidence is promising for some topics the findings of the available reviews are unlikely to end the controversy on this therapy.
format Text
id pubmed-45586
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2001
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-455862001-08-30 Systematic reviews of complementary therapies – an annotated bibliography. Part 3: Homeopathy Linde, Klaus Hondras, Maria Vickers, Andrew Riet, Gerben ter Melchart, Dieter BMC Complement Altern Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Complementary therapies are widespread but controversial. We aim to provide a comprehensive collection and a summary of systematic reviews of clinical trials in three major complementary therapies (acupuncture, herbal medicine, homeopathy). This article is dealing with homeopathy. Potentially relevant reviews were searched through the register of the Cochrane Complementary Medicine Field, the Cochrane Library, Medline, and bibliographies of articles and books. To be included articles had to review prospective clinical trials of homeopathy; had to describe review methods explicitly; had to be published; and had to focus on treatment effects. Information on conditions, interventions, methods, results and conclusions was extracted using a pretested form and summarized descriptively. RESULTS: Eighteen out of 22 potentially relevant reviews preselected in the screening process met the inclusion criteria. Six reviews addressed the question whether homeopathy is effective across conditions and interventions. The majority of available trials seem to report positive results but the evidence is not convincing. For isopathic nosodes for allergic conditions, oscillococcinum for influenza-like syndromes and galphimia for pollinosis the evidence is promising while in other areas reviewed the results are equivocal. INTERPRETATION: Reviews on homeopathy often address general questions. While the evidence is promising for some topics the findings of the available reviews are unlikely to end the controversy on this therapy. BioMed Central 2001-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC45586/ /pubmed/11527508 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-1-4 Text en Copyright © 2001 Linde et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.
spellingShingle Research Article
Linde, Klaus
Hondras, Maria
Vickers, Andrew
Riet, Gerben ter
Melchart, Dieter
Systematic reviews of complementary therapies – an annotated bibliography. Part 3: Homeopathy
title Systematic reviews of complementary therapies – an annotated bibliography. Part 3: Homeopathy
title_full Systematic reviews of complementary therapies – an annotated bibliography. Part 3: Homeopathy
title_fullStr Systematic reviews of complementary therapies – an annotated bibliography. Part 3: Homeopathy
title_full_unstemmed Systematic reviews of complementary therapies – an annotated bibliography. Part 3: Homeopathy
title_short Systematic reviews of complementary therapies – an annotated bibliography. Part 3: Homeopathy
title_sort systematic reviews of complementary therapies – an annotated bibliography. part 3: homeopathy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC45586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11527508
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-1-4
work_keys_str_mv AT lindeklaus systematicreviewsofcomplementarytherapiesanannotatedbibliographypart3homeopathy
AT hondrasmaria systematicreviewsofcomplementarytherapiesanannotatedbibliographypart3homeopathy
AT vickersandrew systematicreviewsofcomplementarytherapiesanannotatedbibliographypart3homeopathy
AT rietgerbenter systematicreviewsofcomplementarytherapiesanannotatedbibliographypart3homeopathy
AT melchartdieter systematicreviewsofcomplementarytherapiesanannotatedbibliographypart3homeopathy