Cargando…

Are the presence of MODIC changes on MRI scans related to “improvement” in low back pain patients treated with lumbar facet joint injections?

BACKGROUND: Modic changes (MC) have been linked with low back pain (LBP) and worse outcomes from some treatments. No studies have investigated the impact that MCs may have on patient outcomes from lumbar facet injections. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to investigate whether the presence of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bianchi, Matilde, Peterson, Cynthia K., Pfirrmann, Christian W. A., Hodler, Juerg, Bolton, Jennifer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4558765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26338033
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0688-x
_version_ 1782388664566808576
author Bianchi, Matilde
Peterson, Cynthia K.
Pfirrmann, Christian W. A.
Hodler, Juerg
Bolton, Jennifer
author_facet Bianchi, Matilde
Peterson, Cynthia K.
Pfirrmann, Christian W. A.
Hodler, Juerg
Bolton, Jennifer
author_sort Bianchi, Matilde
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Modic changes (MC) have been linked with low back pain (LBP) and worse outcomes from some treatments. No studies have investigated the impact that MCs may have on patient outcomes from lumbar facet injections. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to investigate whether the presence of Modic changes is related to ‘improvement’ in patients undergoing imaging-guided lumbar facet injection therapy. METHODS: Outcomes from 226 patients with MRI scans within 3 months of their imaging-guided lumbar facet injections were investigated to determine whether MCs are related to ‘improvement’ post injection. At 1 day, 1 week and 1 month post injection the Patients Global Impression of Change scale answers were collected by postal questionnaire. This was the primary outcome measure. The numerical rating scale for pain data was collected prior to treatment and at the same post injection time points. The MRI scans were independently evaluated by two examiners for the presence/absence of Modic changes and the type of Modic change if present. Kappa statistics were used for reliability of diagnosis analysis. Chi-squared test and logistic regression analysis tested MCs with ‘improvement’. RESULTS: Intra- and inter-examiner reliability for the diagnosis of MCs was Kappa = 0.77 and 0.74. Intra- and inter-examiner reliability for categorizing MCs was K = 0.77 and K = 0.78. At 1 month post injection 45.2 % of patients without MCs reported clinically relevant ‘improvement’ compared to 34.2 % of patients with MC I and 32.1 % of patients with MC II. However, this did not reach statistical significance. Logistic regression found that Modic changes were not predictive of ‘improvement’. CONCLUSIONS: There was a tendency for patients without MCs to have better outcomes but this did not reach statistical significance. The reliability of diagnosing MCs was substantial.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4558765
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45587652015-09-04 Are the presence of MODIC changes on MRI scans related to “improvement” in low back pain patients treated with lumbar facet joint injections? Bianchi, Matilde Peterson, Cynthia K. Pfirrmann, Christian W. A. Hodler, Juerg Bolton, Jennifer BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Modic changes (MC) have been linked with low back pain (LBP) and worse outcomes from some treatments. No studies have investigated the impact that MCs may have on patient outcomes from lumbar facet injections. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to investigate whether the presence of Modic changes is related to ‘improvement’ in patients undergoing imaging-guided lumbar facet injection therapy. METHODS: Outcomes from 226 patients with MRI scans within 3 months of their imaging-guided lumbar facet injections were investigated to determine whether MCs are related to ‘improvement’ post injection. At 1 day, 1 week and 1 month post injection the Patients Global Impression of Change scale answers were collected by postal questionnaire. This was the primary outcome measure. The numerical rating scale for pain data was collected prior to treatment and at the same post injection time points. The MRI scans were independently evaluated by two examiners for the presence/absence of Modic changes and the type of Modic change if present. Kappa statistics were used for reliability of diagnosis analysis. Chi-squared test and logistic regression analysis tested MCs with ‘improvement’. RESULTS: Intra- and inter-examiner reliability for the diagnosis of MCs was Kappa = 0.77 and 0.74. Intra- and inter-examiner reliability for categorizing MCs was K = 0.77 and K = 0.78. At 1 month post injection 45.2 % of patients without MCs reported clinically relevant ‘improvement’ compared to 34.2 % of patients with MC I and 32.1 % of patients with MC II. However, this did not reach statistical significance. Logistic regression found that Modic changes were not predictive of ‘improvement’. CONCLUSIONS: There was a tendency for patients without MCs to have better outcomes but this did not reach statistical significance. The reliability of diagnosing MCs was substantial. BioMed Central 2015-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4558765/ /pubmed/26338033 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0688-x Text en © Bianchi et al. 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bianchi, Matilde
Peterson, Cynthia K.
Pfirrmann, Christian W. A.
Hodler, Juerg
Bolton, Jennifer
Are the presence of MODIC changes on MRI scans related to “improvement” in low back pain patients treated with lumbar facet joint injections?
title Are the presence of MODIC changes on MRI scans related to “improvement” in low back pain patients treated with lumbar facet joint injections?
title_full Are the presence of MODIC changes on MRI scans related to “improvement” in low back pain patients treated with lumbar facet joint injections?
title_fullStr Are the presence of MODIC changes on MRI scans related to “improvement” in low back pain patients treated with lumbar facet joint injections?
title_full_unstemmed Are the presence of MODIC changes on MRI scans related to “improvement” in low back pain patients treated with lumbar facet joint injections?
title_short Are the presence of MODIC changes on MRI scans related to “improvement” in low back pain patients treated with lumbar facet joint injections?
title_sort are the presence of modic changes on mri scans related to “improvement” in low back pain patients treated with lumbar facet joint injections?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4558765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26338033
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0688-x
work_keys_str_mv AT bianchimatilde arethepresenceofmodicchangesonmriscansrelatedtoimprovementinlowbackpainpatientstreatedwithlumbarfacetjointinjections
AT petersoncynthiak arethepresenceofmodicchangesonmriscansrelatedtoimprovementinlowbackpainpatientstreatedwithlumbarfacetjointinjections
AT pfirrmannchristianwa arethepresenceofmodicchangesonmriscansrelatedtoimprovementinlowbackpainpatientstreatedwithlumbarfacetjointinjections
AT hodlerjuerg arethepresenceofmodicchangesonmriscansrelatedtoimprovementinlowbackpainpatientstreatedwithlumbarfacetjointinjections
AT boltonjennifer arethepresenceofmodicchangesonmriscansrelatedtoimprovementinlowbackpainpatientstreatedwithlumbarfacetjointinjections