Cargando…

The AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system: A reliability and agreement study

AIM: Recently, AOSpine trauma knowledge forum proposed the AOSpine thoracolumbar injury classification (AOSTLIC) system and suggested that it was reliable. However, reliability data from additional institutions for the AOSTLIC system are not available. This study was to examine the reliability of th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Azimi, Parisa, Mohammadi, Hassan Reza, Azhari, Shirzad, Alizadeh, Pooyan, Montazeri, Ali
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4558803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26425156
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1793-5482.162703
_version_ 1782388670784864256
author Azimi, Parisa
Mohammadi, Hassan Reza
Azhari, Shirzad
Alizadeh, Pooyan
Montazeri, Ali
author_facet Azimi, Parisa
Mohammadi, Hassan Reza
Azhari, Shirzad
Alizadeh, Pooyan
Montazeri, Ali
author_sort Azimi, Parisa
collection PubMed
description AIM: Recently, AOSpine trauma knowledge forum proposed the AOSpine thoracolumbar injury classification (AOSTLIC) system and suggested that it was reliable. However, reliability data from additional institutions for the AOSTLIC system are not available. This study was to examine the reliability of the AOSTLIC system in patients with thoracolumbar (TL) fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between August 2009 and June 2012, 56 patients with 74 levels traumatic TL spinal injuries were recruited. Two classifiers, consisting of two spine surgeons, assessed clinical and imaging data. Initially, one surgeon reviewed the data in order to classify and calculate injury severity score according to the AOSTSIC system. This process was repeated on a 5-week interval by another surgeon. Then we analyzed data for intra-observer and inter-observer reliability using the kappa statistic (k). Finally, validity was assessed using the known-groups comparison. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 59.5 ± 11.5 years. The κ values for the AOSTSIC system for intra-observer and inter-observer reliability ranged from 0.83 to 0.89, indicating nearly perfect agreement agreements. Known-groups analysis showed satisfactory results. The AOSTSIC system discriminated well between sub-groups of patients who differed in Oswestry disability index. CONCLUSION: The findings showed that the morphologic classification in AOSTSIC system appears to be reliable and reproducible classification.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4558803
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45588032015-10-01 The AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system: A reliability and agreement study Azimi, Parisa Mohammadi, Hassan Reza Azhari, Shirzad Alizadeh, Pooyan Montazeri, Ali Asian J Neurosurg Original Article AIM: Recently, AOSpine trauma knowledge forum proposed the AOSpine thoracolumbar injury classification (AOSTLIC) system and suggested that it was reliable. However, reliability data from additional institutions for the AOSTLIC system are not available. This study was to examine the reliability of the AOSTLIC system in patients with thoracolumbar (TL) fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between August 2009 and June 2012, 56 patients with 74 levels traumatic TL spinal injuries were recruited. Two classifiers, consisting of two spine surgeons, assessed clinical and imaging data. Initially, one surgeon reviewed the data in order to classify and calculate injury severity score according to the AOSTSIC system. This process was repeated on a 5-week interval by another surgeon. Then we analyzed data for intra-observer and inter-observer reliability using the kappa statistic (k). Finally, validity was assessed using the known-groups comparison. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 59.5 ± 11.5 years. The κ values for the AOSTSIC system for intra-observer and inter-observer reliability ranged from 0.83 to 0.89, indicating nearly perfect agreement agreements. Known-groups analysis showed satisfactory results. The AOSTSIC system discriminated well between sub-groups of patients who differed in Oswestry disability index. CONCLUSION: The findings showed that the morphologic classification in AOSTSIC system appears to be reliable and reproducible classification. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4558803/ /pubmed/26425156 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1793-5482.162703 Text en Copyright: © Asian Journal of Neurosurgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Azimi, Parisa
Mohammadi, Hassan Reza
Azhari, Shirzad
Alizadeh, Pooyan
Montazeri, Ali
The AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system: A reliability and agreement study
title The AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system: A reliability and agreement study
title_full The AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system: A reliability and agreement study
title_fullStr The AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system: A reliability and agreement study
title_full_unstemmed The AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system: A reliability and agreement study
title_short The AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system: A reliability and agreement study
title_sort aospine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system: a reliability and agreement study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4558803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26425156
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1793-5482.162703
work_keys_str_mv AT azimiparisa theaospinethoracolumbarspineinjuryclassificationsystemareliabilityandagreementstudy
AT mohammadihassanreza theaospinethoracolumbarspineinjuryclassificationsystemareliabilityandagreementstudy
AT azharishirzad theaospinethoracolumbarspineinjuryclassificationsystemareliabilityandagreementstudy
AT alizadehpooyan theaospinethoracolumbarspineinjuryclassificationsystemareliabilityandagreementstudy
AT montazeriali theaospinethoracolumbarspineinjuryclassificationsystemareliabilityandagreementstudy
AT azimiparisa aospinethoracolumbarspineinjuryclassificationsystemareliabilityandagreementstudy
AT mohammadihassanreza aospinethoracolumbarspineinjuryclassificationsystemareliabilityandagreementstudy
AT azharishirzad aospinethoracolumbarspineinjuryclassificationsystemareliabilityandagreementstudy
AT alizadehpooyan aospinethoracolumbarspineinjuryclassificationsystemareliabilityandagreementstudy
AT montazeriali aospinethoracolumbarspineinjuryclassificationsystemareliabilityandagreementstudy