Cargando…
The AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system: A reliability and agreement study
AIM: Recently, AOSpine trauma knowledge forum proposed the AOSpine thoracolumbar injury classification (AOSTLIC) system and suggested that it was reliable. However, reliability data from additional institutions for the AOSTLIC system are not available. This study was to examine the reliability of th...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4558803/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26425156 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1793-5482.162703 |
_version_ | 1782388670784864256 |
---|---|
author | Azimi, Parisa Mohammadi, Hassan Reza Azhari, Shirzad Alizadeh, Pooyan Montazeri, Ali |
author_facet | Azimi, Parisa Mohammadi, Hassan Reza Azhari, Shirzad Alizadeh, Pooyan Montazeri, Ali |
author_sort | Azimi, Parisa |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: Recently, AOSpine trauma knowledge forum proposed the AOSpine thoracolumbar injury classification (AOSTLIC) system and suggested that it was reliable. However, reliability data from additional institutions for the AOSTLIC system are not available. This study was to examine the reliability of the AOSTLIC system in patients with thoracolumbar (TL) fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between August 2009 and June 2012, 56 patients with 74 levels traumatic TL spinal injuries were recruited. Two classifiers, consisting of two spine surgeons, assessed clinical and imaging data. Initially, one surgeon reviewed the data in order to classify and calculate injury severity score according to the AOSTSIC system. This process was repeated on a 5-week interval by another surgeon. Then we analyzed data for intra-observer and inter-observer reliability using the kappa statistic (k). Finally, validity was assessed using the known-groups comparison. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 59.5 ± 11.5 years. The κ values for the AOSTSIC system for intra-observer and inter-observer reliability ranged from 0.83 to 0.89, indicating nearly perfect agreement agreements. Known-groups analysis showed satisfactory results. The AOSTSIC system discriminated well between sub-groups of patients who differed in Oswestry disability index. CONCLUSION: The findings showed that the morphologic classification in AOSTSIC system appears to be reliable and reproducible classification. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4558803 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45588032015-10-01 The AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system: A reliability and agreement study Azimi, Parisa Mohammadi, Hassan Reza Azhari, Shirzad Alizadeh, Pooyan Montazeri, Ali Asian J Neurosurg Original Article AIM: Recently, AOSpine trauma knowledge forum proposed the AOSpine thoracolumbar injury classification (AOSTLIC) system and suggested that it was reliable. However, reliability data from additional institutions for the AOSTLIC system are not available. This study was to examine the reliability of the AOSTLIC system in patients with thoracolumbar (TL) fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between August 2009 and June 2012, 56 patients with 74 levels traumatic TL spinal injuries were recruited. Two classifiers, consisting of two spine surgeons, assessed clinical and imaging data. Initially, one surgeon reviewed the data in order to classify and calculate injury severity score according to the AOSTSIC system. This process was repeated on a 5-week interval by another surgeon. Then we analyzed data for intra-observer and inter-observer reliability using the kappa statistic (k). Finally, validity was assessed using the known-groups comparison. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 59.5 ± 11.5 years. The κ values for the AOSTSIC system for intra-observer and inter-observer reliability ranged from 0.83 to 0.89, indicating nearly perfect agreement agreements. Known-groups analysis showed satisfactory results. The AOSTSIC system discriminated well between sub-groups of patients who differed in Oswestry disability index. CONCLUSION: The findings showed that the morphologic classification in AOSTSIC system appears to be reliable and reproducible classification. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4558803/ /pubmed/26425156 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1793-5482.162703 Text en Copyright: © Asian Journal of Neurosurgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Azimi, Parisa Mohammadi, Hassan Reza Azhari, Shirzad Alizadeh, Pooyan Montazeri, Ali The AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system: A reliability and agreement study |
title | The AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system: A reliability and agreement study |
title_full | The AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system: A reliability and agreement study |
title_fullStr | The AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system: A reliability and agreement study |
title_full_unstemmed | The AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system: A reliability and agreement study |
title_short | The AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system: A reliability and agreement study |
title_sort | aospine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system: a reliability and agreement study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4558803/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26425156 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1793-5482.162703 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT azimiparisa theaospinethoracolumbarspineinjuryclassificationsystemareliabilityandagreementstudy AT mohammadihassanreza theaospinethoracolumbarspineinjuryclassificationsystemareliabilityandagreementstudy AT azharishirzad theaospinethoracolumbarspineinjuryclassificationsystemareliabilityandagreementstudy AT alizadehpooyan theaospinethoracolumbarspineinjuryclassificationsystemareliabilityandagreementstudy AT montazeriali theaospinethoracolumbarspineinjuryclassificationsystemareliabilityandagreementstudy AT azimiparisa aospinethoracolumbarspineinjuryclassificationsystemareliabilityandagreementstudy AT mohammadihassanreza aospinethoracolumbarspineinjuryclassificationsystemareliabilityandagreementstudy AT azharishirzad aospinethoracolumbarspineinjuryclassificationsystemareliabilityandagreementstudy AT alizadehpooyan aospinethoracolumbarspineinjuryclassificationsystemareliabilityandagreementstudy AT montazeriali aospinethoracolumbarspineinjuryclassificationsystemareliabilityandagreementstudy |