Cargando…

X-Phi and Carnapian Explication

The rise of experimental philosophy (x-phi) has placed metaphilosophical questions, particularly those concerning concepts, at the center of philosophical attention. X-phi offers empirically rigorous methods for identifying conceptual content, but what exactly it contributes towards evaluating conce...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shepherd, Joshua, Justus, James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4558950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26345713
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10670-014-9648-3
_version_ 1782388693369094144
author Shepherd, Joshua
Justus, James
author_facet Shepherd, Joshua
Justus, James
author_sort Shepherd, Joshua
collection PubMed
description The rise of experimental philosophy (x-phi) has placed metaphilosophical questions, particularly those concerning concepts, at the center of philosophical attention. X-phi offers empirically rigorous methods for identifying conceptual content, but what exactly it contributes towards evaluating conceptual content remains unclear. We show how x-phi complements Rudolf Carnap’s underappreciated methodology for concept determination, explication. This clarifies and extends x-phi’s positive philosophical import, and also exhibits explication’s broad appeal. But there is a potential problem: Carnap’s account of explication was limited to empirical and logical concepts, but many concepts of interest to philosophers (experimental and otherwise) are essentially normative. With formal epistemology as a case study, we show how x-phi assisted explication can apply to normative domains.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4558950
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45589502015-09-03 X-Phi and Carnapian Explication Shepherd, Joshua Justus, James Erkenntnis Article The rise of experimental philosophy (x-phi) has placed metaphilosophical questions, particularly those concerning concepts, at the center of philosophical attention. X-phi offers empirically rigorous methods for identifying conceptual content, but what exactly it contributes towards evaluating conceptual content remains unclear. We show how x-phi complements Rudolf Carnap’s underappreciated methodology for concept determination, explication. This clarifies and extends x-phi’s positive philosophical import, and also exhibits explication’s broad appeal. But there is a potential problem: Carnap’s account of explication was limited to empirical and logical concepts, but many concepts of interest to philosophers (experimental and otherwise) are essentially normative. With formal epistemology as a case study, we show how x-phi assisted explication can apply to normative domains. 2015-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4558950/ /pubmed/26345713 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10670-014-9648-3 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Shepherd, Joshua
Justus, James
X-Phi and Carnapian Explication
title X-Phi and Carnapian Explication
title_full X-Phi and Carnapian Explication
title_fullStr X-Phi and Carnapian Explication
title_full_unstemmed X-Phi and Carnapian Explication
title_short X-Phi and Carnapian Explication
title_sort x-phi and carnapian explication
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4558950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26345713
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10670-014-9648-3
work_keys_str_mv AT shepherdjoshua xphiandcarnapianexplication
AT justusjames xphiandcarnapianexplication