Cargando…

Radiation dose-fractionation effects in spinal cord: comparison of animal and human data

PURPOSE: Recognizing spinal cord dose limits in various fractionations is essential to ensure adequate dose for tumor control while minimizing the chance of radiation-induced myelopathy (RIM). This study aimed to determine the α/β ratio of the spinal cord and the cord dose limit in terms of BED50, t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jin, Jian-Yue, Huang, Yimei, Brown, Stephen L., Movsas, Benjamin, Kaminski, Joseph, Chetty, Indrin J., Ryu, Samuel, Kong, Feng-Ming (Spring)
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4559090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26366252
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13566-015-0212-9
_version_ 1782388720188522496
author Jin, Jian-Yue
Huang, Yimei
Brown, Stephen L.
Movsas, Benjamin
Kaminski, Joseph
Chetty, Indrin J.
Ryu, Samuel
Kong, Feng-Ming (Spring)
author_facet Jin, Jian-Yue
Huang, Yimei
Brown, Stephen L.
Movsas, Benjamin
Kaminski, Joseph
Chetty, Indrin J.
Ryu, Samuel
Kong, Feng-Ming (Spring)
author_sort Jin, Jian-Yue
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Recognizing spinal cord dose limits in various fractionations is essential to ensure adequate dose for tumor control while minimizing the chance of radiation-induced myelopathy (RIM). This study aimed to determine the α/β ratio of the spinal cord and the cord dose limit in terms of BED50, the biological equivalent dose (BED) that induces 50 % chance of RIM, by fitting data collected from published animal and patient studies. METHODS: RIM data from five rat studies; three large animal studies on monkeys, dogs, and pigs; and 18 patient studies were included for the investigation. The α/β ratios were derived, respectively, for rat (group A), large animal (group B), patient (group C), and combined data (group D). RESULTS: The α/β ratio (and its 95 % confidental interval) was 4.1 (3.2, 5.0) or 3.6 (2.6, 4.6) Gy for group A, depending on fitting algorithms. It was 3.9 (3.0, 4.8), 3.7 (2.2, 8.2) and 3.9 (3.0, 4.9) for groups B, C, and D, respectively. BED50 was 111 Gy for the combined data. It corresponds to a D50 of 73.4 Gy in 2 Gy/FX, or 19.0 Gy in single fraction. BED5, which is the BED to induce 5 % of RIM, was calculated to be 83.9 Gy. It corresponds to D5 of 55.4 Gy in 2 Gy/FX, or 16.2 Gy in single fraction. CONCLUSION: The study showed that all four groups had similar α/β ratios close to 3.9 Gy, suggesting that the spinal cord has a similar fractionation effect for different species, including human beings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4559090
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45590902015-09-09 Radiation dose-fractionation effects in spinal cord: comparison of animal and human data Jin, Jian-Yue Huang, Yimei Brown, Stephen L. Movsas, Benjamin Kaminski, Joseph Chetty, Indrin J. Ryu, Samuel Kong, Feng-Ming (Spring) J Radiat Oncol Original Research PURPOSE: Recognizing spinal cord dose limits in various fractionations is essential to ensure adequate dose for tumor control while minimizing the chance of radiation-induced myelopathy (RIM). This study aimed to determine the α/β ratio of the spinal cord and the cord dose limit in terms of BED50, the biological equivalent dose (BED) that induces 50 % chance of RIM, by fitting data collected from published animal and patient studies. METHODS: RIM data from five rat studies; three large animal studies on monkeys, dogs, and pigs; and 18 patient studies were included for the investigation. The α/β ratios were derived, respectively, for rat (group A), large animal (group B), patient (group C), and combined data (group D). RESULTS: The α/β ratio (and its 95 % confidental interval) was 4.1 (3.2, 5.0) or 3.6 (2.6, 4.6) Gy for group A, depending on fitting algorithms. It was 3.9 (3.0, 4.8), 3.7 (2.2, 8.2) and 3.9 (3.0, 4.9) for groups B, C, and D, respectively. BED50 was 111 Gy for the combined data. It corresponds to a D50 of 73.4 Gy in 2 Gy/FX, or 19.0 Gy in single fraction. BED5, which is the BED to induce 5 % of RIM, was calculated to be 83.9 Gy. It corresponds to D5 of 55.4 Gy in 2 Gy/FX, or 16.2 Gy in single fraction. CONCLUSION: The study showed that all four groups had similar α/β ratios close to 3.9 Gy, suggesting that the spinal cord has a similar fractionation effect for different species, including human beings. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-08-14 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4559090/ /pubmed/26366252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13566-015-0212-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Jin, Jian-Yue
Huang, Yimei
Brown, Stephen L.
Movsas, Benjamin
Kaminski, Joseph
Chetty, Indrin J.
Ryu, Samuel
Kong, Feng-Ming (Spring)
Radiation dose-fractionation effects in spinal cord: comparison of animal and human data
title Radiation dose-fractionation effects in spinal cord: comparison of animal and human data
title_full Radiation dose-fractionation effects in spinal cord: comparison of animal and human data
title_fullStr Radiation dose-fractionation effects in spinal cord: comparison of animal and human data
title_full_unstemmed Radiation dose-fractionation effects in spinal cord: comparison of animal and human data
title_short Radiation dose-fractionation effects in spinal cord: comparison of animal and human data
title_sort radiation dose-fractionation effects in spinal cord: comparison of animal and human data
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4559090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26366252
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13566-015-0212-9
work_keys_str_mv AT jinjianyue radiationdosefractionationeffectsinspinalcordcomparisonofanimalandhumandata
AT huangyimei radiationdosefractionationeffectsinspinalcordcomparisonofanimalandhumandata
AT brownstephenl radiationdosefractionationeffectsinspinalcordcomparisonofanimalandhumandata
AT movsasbenjamin radiationdosefractionationeffectsinspinalcordcomparisonofanimalandhumandata
AT kaminskijoseph radiationdosefractionationeffectsinspinalcordcomparisonofanimalandhumandata
AT chettyindrinj radiationdosefractionationeffectsinspinalcordcomparisonofanimalandhumandata
AT ryusamuel radiationdosefractionationeffectsinspinalcordcomparisonofanimalandhumandata
AT kongfengmingspring radiationdosefractionationeffectsinspinalcordcomparisonofanimalandhumandata