Cargando…
Radiation dose-fractionation effects in spinal cord: comparison of animal and human data
PURPOSE: Recognizing spinal cord dose limits in various fractionations is essential to ensure adequate dose for tumor control while minimizing the chance of radiation-induced myelopathy (RIM). This study aimed to determine the α/β ratio of the spinal cord and the cord dose limit in terms of BED50, t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4559090/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26366252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13566-015-0212-9 |
_version_ | 1782388720188522496 |
---|---|
author | Jin, Jian-Yue Huang, Yimei Brown, Stephen L. Movsas, Benjamin Kaminski, Joseph Chetty, Indrin J. Ryu, Samuel Kong, Feng-Ming (Spring) |
author_facet | Jin, Jian-Yue Huang, Yimei Brown, Stephen L. Movsas, Benjamin Kaminski, Joseph Chetty, Indrin J. Ryu, Samuel Kong, Feng-Ming (Spring) |
author_sort | Jin, Jian-Yue |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Recognizing spinal cord dose limits in various fractionations is essential to ensure adequate dose for tumor control while minimizing the chance of radiation-induced myelopathy (RIM). This study aimed to determine the α/β ratio of the spinal cord and the cord dose limit in terms of BED50, the biological equivalent dose (BED) that induces 50 % chance of RIM, by fitting data collected from published animal and patient studies. METHODS: RIM data from five rat studies; three large animal studies on monkeys, dogs, and pigs; and 18 patient studies were included for the investigation. The α/β ratios were derived, respectively, for rat (group A), large animal (group B), patient (group C), and combined data (group D). RESULTS: The α/β ratio (and its 95 % confidental interval) was 4.1 (3.2, 5.0) or 3.6 (2.6, 4.6) Gy for group A, depending on fitting algorithms. It was 3.9 (3.0, 4.8), 3.7 (2.2, 8.2) and 3.9 (3.0, 4.9) for groups B, C, and D, respectively. BED50 was 111 Gy for the combined data. It corresponds to a D50 of 73.4 Gy in 2 Gy/FX, or 19.0 Gy in single fraction. BED5, which is the BED to induce 5 % of RIM, was calculated to be 83.9 Gy. It corresponds to D5 of 55.4 Gy in 2 Gy/FX, or 16.2 Gy in single fraction. CONCLUSION: The study showed that all four groups had similar α/β ratios close to 3.9 Gy, suggesting that the spinal cord has a similar fractionation effect for different species, including human beings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4559090 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45590902015-09-09 Radiation dose-fractionation effects in spinal cord: comparison of animal and human data Jin, Jian-Yue Huang, Yimei Brown, Stephen L. Movsas, Benjamin Kaminski, Joseph Chetty, Indrin J. Ryu, Samuel Kong, Feng-Ming (Spring) J Radiat Oncol Original Research PURPOSE: Recognizing spinal cord dose limits in various fractionations is essential to ensure adequate dose for tumor control while minimizing the chance of radiation-induced myelopathy (RIM). This study aimed to determine the α/β ratio of the spinal cord and the cord dose limit in terms of BED50, the biological equivalent dose (BED) that induces 50 % chance of RIM, by fitting data collected from published animal and patient studies. METHODS: RIM data from five rat studies; three large animal studies on monkeys, dogs, and pigs; and 18 patient studies were included for the investigation. The α/β ratios were derived, respectively, for rat (group A), large animal (group B), patient (group C), and combined data (group D). RESULTS: The α/β ratio (and its 95 % confidental interval) was 4.1 (3.2, 5.0) or 3.6 (2.6, 4.6) Gy for group A, depending on fitting algorithms. It was 3.9 (3.0, 4.8), 3.7 (2.2, 8.2) and 3.9 (3.0, 4.9) for groups B, C, and D, respectively. BED50 was 111 Gy for the combined data. It corresponds to a D50 of 73.4 Gy in 2 Gy/FX, or 19.0 Gy in single fraction. BED5, which is the BED to induce 5 % of RIM, was calculated to be 83.9 Gy. It corresponds to D5 of 55.4 Gy in 2 Gy/FX, or 16.2 Gy in single fraction. CONCLUSION: The study showed that all four groups had similar α/β ratios close to 3.9 Gy, suggesting that the spinal cord has a similar fractionation effect for different species, including human beings. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-08-14 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4559090/ /pubmed/26366252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13566-015-0212-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Jin, Jian-Yue Huang, Yimei Brown, Stephen L. Movsas, Benjamin Kaminski, Joseph Chetty, Indrin J. Ryu, Samuel Kong, Feng-Ming (Spring) Radiation dose-fractionation effects in spinal cord: comparison of animal and human data |
title | Radiation dose-fractionation effects in spinal cord: comparison of animal and human data |
title_full | Radiation dose-fractionation effects in spinal cord: comparison of animal and human data |
title_fullStr | Radiation dose-fractionation effects in spinal cord: comparison of animal and human data |
title_full_unstemmed | Radiation dose-fractionation effects in spinal cord: comparison of animal and human data |
title_short | Radiation dose-fractionation effects in spinal cord: comparison of animal and human data |
title_sort | radiation dose-fractionation effects in spinal cord: comparison of animal and human data |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4559090/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26366252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13566-015-0212-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jinjianyue radiationdosefractionationeffectsinspinalcordcomparisonofanimalandhumandata AT huangyimei radiationdosefractionationeffectsinspinalcordcomparisonofanimalandhumandata AT brownstephenl radiationdosefractionationeffectsinspinalcordcomparisonofanimalandhumandata AT movsasbenjamin radiationdosefractionationeffectsinspinalcordcomparisonofanimalandhumandata AT kaminskijoseph radiationdosefractionationeffectsinspinalcordcomparisonofanimalandhumandata AT chettyindrinj radiationdosefractionationeffectsinspinalcordcomparisonofanimalandhumandata AT ryusamuel radiationdosefractionationeffectsinspinalcordcomparisonofanimalandhumandata AT kongfengmingspring radiationdosefractionationeffectsinspinalcordcomparisonofanimalandhumandata |