Cargando…

Current Developments in Dementia Risk Prediction Modelling: An Updated Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: Accurate identification of individuals at high risk of dementia influences clinical care, inclusion criteria for clinical trials and development of preventative strategies. Numerous models have been developed for predicting dementia. To evaluate these models we undertook a systematic rev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tang, Eugene Y. H., Harrison, Stephanie L., Errington, Linda, Gordon, Mark F., Visser, Pieter Jelle, Novak, Gerald, Dufouil, Carole, Brayne, Carol, Robinson, Louise, Launer, Lenore J., Stephan, Blossom C. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4559315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26334524
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136181
_version_ 1782388756396900352
author Tang, Eugene Y. H.
Harrison, Stephanie L.
Errington, Linda
Gordon, Mark F.
Visser, Pieter Jelle
Novak, Gerald
Dufouil, Carole
Brayne, Carol
Robinson, Louise
Launer, Lenore J.
Stephan, Blossom C. M.
author_facet Tang, Eugene Y. H.
Harrison, Stephanie L.
Errington, Linda
Gordon, Mark F.
Visser, Pieter Jelle
Novak, Gerald
Dufouil, Carole
Brayne, Carol
Robinson, Louise
Launer, Lenore J.
Stephan, Blossom C. M.
author_sort Tang, Eugene Y. H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Accurate identification of individuals at high risk of dementia influences clinical care, inclusion criteria for clinical trials and development of preventative strategies. Numerous models have been developed for predicting dementia. To evaluate these models we undertook a systematic review in 2010 and updated this in 2014 due to the increase in research published in this area. Here we include a critique of the variables selected for inclusion and an assessment of model prognostic performance. METHODS: Our previous systematic review was updated with a search from January 2009 to March 2014 in electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science). Articles examining risk of dementia in non-demented individuals and including measures of sensitivity, specificity or the area under the curve (AUC) or c-statistic were included. FINDINGS: In total, 1,234 articles were identified from the search; 21 articles met inclusion criteria. New developments in dementia risk prediction include the testing of non-APOE genes, use of non-traditional dementia risk factors, incorporation of diet, physical function and ethnicity, and model development in specific subgroups of the population including individuals with diabetes and those with different educational levels. Four models have been externally validated. Three studies considered time or cost implications of computing the model. INTERPRETATION: There is no one model that is recommended for dementia risk prediction in population-based settings. Further, it is unlikely that one model will fit all. Consideration of the optimal features of new models should focus on methodology (setting/sample, model development and testing in a replication cohort) and the acceptability and cost of attaining the risk variables included in the prediction score. Further work is required to validate existing models or develop new ones in different populations as well as determine the ethical implications of dementia risk prediction, before applying the particular models in population or clinical settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4559315
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45593152015-09-10 Current Developments in Dementia Risk Prediction Modelling: An Updated Systematic Review Tang, Eugene Y. H. Harrison, Stephanie L. Errington, Linda Gordon, Mark F. Visser, Pieter Jelle Novak, Gerald Dufouil, Carole Brayne, Carol Robinson, Louise Launer, Lenore J. Stephan, Blossom C. M. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Accurate identification of individuals at high risk of dementia influences clinical care, inclusion criteria for clinical trials and development of preventative strategies. Numerous models have been developed for predicting dementia. To evaluate these models we undertook a systematic review in 2010 and updated this in 2014 due to the increase in research published in this area. Here we include a critique of the variables selected for inclusion and an assessment of model prognostic performance. METHODS: Our previous systematic review was updated with a search from January 2009 to March 2014 in electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science). Articles examining risk of dementia in non-demented individuals and including measures of sensitivity, specificity or the area under the curve (AUC) or c-statistic were included. FINDINGS: In total, 1,234 articles were identified from the search; 21 articles met inclusion criteria. New developments in dementia risk prediction include the testing of non-APOE genes, use of non-traditional dementia risk factors, incorporation of diet, physical function and ethnicity, and model development in specific subgroups of the population including individuals with diabetes and those with different educational levels. Four models have been externally validated. Three studies considered time or cost implications of computing the model. INTERPRETATION: There is no one model that is recommended for dementia risk prediction in population-based settings. Further, it is unlikely that one model will fit all. Consideration of the optimal features of new models should focus on methodology (setting/sample, model development and testing in a replication cohort) and the acceptability and cost of attaining the risk variables included in the prediction score. Further work is required to validate existing models or develop new ones in different populations as well as determine the ethical implications of dementia risk prediction, before applying the particular models in population or clinical settings. Public Library of Science 2015-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4559315/ /pubmed/26334524 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136181 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration, which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tang, Eugene Y. H.
Harrison, Stephanie L.
Errington, Linda
Gordon, Mark F.
Visser, Pieter Jelle
Novak, Gerald
Dufouil, Carole
Brayne, Carol
Robinson, Louise
Launer, Lenore J.
Stephan, Blossom C. M.
Current Developments in Dementia Risk Prediction Modelling: An Updated Systematic Review
title Current Developments in Dementia Risk Prediction Modelling: An Updated Systematic Review
title_full Current Developments in Dementia Risk Prediction Modelling: An Updated Systematic Review
title_fullStr Current Developments in Dementia Risk Prediction Modelling: An Updated Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Current Developments in Dementia Risk Prediction Modelling: An Updated Systematic Review
title_short Current Developments in Dementia Risk Prediction Modelling: An Updated Systematic Review
title_sort current developments in dementia risk prediction modelling: an updated systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4559315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26334524
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136181
work_keys_str_mv AT tangeugeneyh currentdevelopmentsindementiariskpredictionmodellinganupdatedsystematicreview
AT harrisonstephaniel currentdevelopmentsindementiariskpredictionmodellinganupdatedsystematicreview
AT erringtonlinda currentdevelopmentsindementiariskpredictionmodellinganupdatedsystematicreview
AT gordonmarkf currentdevelopmentsindementiariskpredictionmodellinganupdatedsystematicreview
AT visserpieterjelle currentdevelopmentsindementiariskpredictionmodellinganupdatedsystematicreview
AT novakgerald currentdevelopmentsindementiariskpredictionmodellinganupdatedsystematicreview
AT dufouilcarole currentdevelopmentsindementiariskpredictionmodellinganupdatedsystematicreview
AT braynecarol currentdevelopmentsindementiariskpredictionmodellinganupdatedsystematicreview
AT robinsonlouise currentdevelopmentsindementiariskpredictionmodellinganupdatedsystematicreview
AT launerlenorej currentdevelopmentsindementiariskpredictionmodellinganupdatedsystematicreview
AT stephanblossomcm currentdevelopmentsindementiariskpredictionmodellinganupdatedsystematicreview