Cargando…
Non-invasive imaging of implanted peritoneal carcinomatosis in mice using PET and bioluminescence imaging
BACKGROUND: Non-invasive imaging of peritoneal carcinomatosis remains challenging. The aim of this study was to compare positron emission tomography (PET) and bioluminescence imaging (BLI) for the early detection of peritoneal carcinomatosis in a mouse model. METHODS: Female nude mice were inoculate...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4559549/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26337805 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-015-0125-z |
_version_ | 1782388791163486208 |
---|---|
author | Stollfuss, J. Landvogt, N. Abenstein, M. Ziegler, S. Schwaiger, M. Senekowitsch-Schmidtke, R. Wieder, H. |
author_facet | Stollfuss, J. Landvogt, N. Abenstein, M. Ziegler, S. Schwaiger, M. Senekowitsch-Schmidtke, R. Wieder, H. |
author_sort | Stollfuss, J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Non-invasive imaging of peritoneal carcinomatosis remains challenging. The aim of this study was to compare positron emission tomography (PET) and bioluminescence imaging (BLI) for the early detection of peritoneal carcinomatosis in a mouse model. METHODS: Female nude mice were inoculated intraperitoneally with 1×10(7) HSC45-M2-luc gastric cancer cells. The cells were stably transfected with the gene coding for firefly luciferase. Tumour development was monitored using PET and BLI and in two subgroups, on days 3 and 4 or on days 6 and 7 after tumour cell inoculation. Tumour nodules found on post mortem examination served as the reference standard for evaluating the images. RESULTS: PET detected 58/82 lesions (sensitivity 71 %). This method detected all (100 %) nodules larger than 6 mm, 88 % of nodules in the range of >2–4 mm, and even 58 % of small nodules measuring only 1–2 mm. BLI identified a total of 40/82 lesions (sensitivity 49 %). The difference between PET and BLI was statistically significant at p < 0.05 (PET/BLI chi-square 8.2). CONCLUSIONS: PET was more sensitive than BLI for the detection of early peritoneal carcinomatosis in our mouse model. The sensitivity of BLI largely depended on the site of the lesions in relation to the imaging device. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4559549 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45595492015-09-10 Non-invasive imaging of implanted peritoneal carcinomatosis in mice using PET and bioluminescence imaging Stollfuss, J. Landvogt, N. Abenstein, M. Ziegler, S. Schwaiger, M. Senekowitsch-Schmidtke, R. Wieder, H. EJNMMI Res Original Research BACKGROUND: Non-invasive imaging of peritoneal carcinomatosis remains challenging. The aim of this study was to compare positron emission tomography (PET) and bioluminescence imaging (BLI) for the early detection of peritoneal carcinomatosis in a mouse model. METHODS: Female nude mice were inoculated intraperitoneally with 1×10(7) HSC45-M2-luc gastric cancer cells. The cells were stably transfected with the gene coding for firefly luciferase. Tumour development was monitored using PET and BLI and in two subgroups, on days 3 and 4 or on days 6 and 7 after tumour cell inoculation. Tumour nodules found on post mortem examination served as the reference standard for evaluating the images. RESULTS: PET detected 58/82 lesions (sensitivity 71 %). This method detected all (100 %) nodules larger than 6 mm, 88 % of nodules in the range of >2–4 mm, and even 58 % of small nodules measuring only 1–2 mm. BLI identified a total of 40/82 lesions (sensitivity 49 %). The difference between PET and BLI was statistically significant at p < 0.05 (PET/BLI chi-square 8.2). CONCLUSIONS: PET was more sensitive than BLI for the detection of early peritoneal carcinomatosis in our mouse model. The sensitivity of BLI largely depended on the site of the lesions in relation to the imaging device. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4559549/ /pubmed/26337805 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-015-0125-z Text en © Stollfuss et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Stollfuss, J. Landvogt, N. Abenstein, M. Ziegler, S. Schwaiger, M. Senekowitsch-Schmidtke, R. Wieder, H. Non-invasive imaging of implanted peritoneal carcinomatosis in mice using PET and bioluminescence imaging |
title | Non-invasive imaging of implanted peritoneal carcinomatosis in mice using PET and bioluminescence imaging |
title_full | Non-invasive imaging of implanted peritoneal carcinomatosis in mice using PET and bioluminescence imaging |
title_fullStr | Non-invasive imaging of implanted peritoneal carcinomatosis in mice using PET and bioluminescence imaging |
title_full_unstemmed | Non-invasive imaging of implanted peritoneal carcinomatosis in mice using PET and bioluminescence imaging |
title_short | Non-invasive imaging of implanted peritoneal carcinomatosis in mice using PET and bioluminescence imaging |
title_sort | non-invasive imaging of implanted peritoneal carcinomatosis in mice using pet and bioluminescence imaging |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4559549/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26337805 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-015-0125-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stollfussj noninvasiveimagingofimplantedperitonealcarcinomatosisinmiceusingpetandbioluminescenceimaging AT landvogtn noninvasiveimagingofimplantedperitonealcarcinomatosisinmiceusingpetandbioluminescenceimaging AT abensteinm noninvasiveimagingofimplantedperitonealcarcinomatosisinmiceusingpetandbioluminescenceimaging AT zieglers noninvasiveimagingofimplantedperitonealcarcinomatosisinmiceusingpetandbioluminescenceimaging AT schwaigerm noninvasiveimagingofimplantedperitonealcarcinomatosisinmiceusingpetandbioluminescenceimaging AT senekowitschschmidtker noninvasiveimagingofimplantedperitonealcarcinomatosisinmiceusingpetandbioluminescenceimaging AT wiederh noninvasiveimagingofimplantedperitonealcarcinomatosisinmiceusingpetandbioluminescenceimaging |