Cargando…

Non-invasive imaging of implanted peritoneal carcinomatosis in mice using PET and bioluminescence imaging

BACKGROUND: Non-invasive imaging of peritoneal carcinomatosis remains challenging. The aim of this study was to compare positron emission tomography (PET) and bioluminescence imaging (BLI) for the early detection of peritoneal carcinomatosis in a mouse model. METHODS: Female nude mice were inoculate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stollfuss, J., Landvogt, N., Abenstein, M., Ziegler, S., Schwaiger, M., Senekowitsch-Schmidtke, R., Wieder, H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4559549/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26337805
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-015-0125-z
_version_ 1782388791163486208
author Stollfuss, J.
Landvogt, N.
Abenstein, M.
Ziegler, S.
Schwaiger, M.
Senekowitsch-Schmidtke, R.
Wieder, H.
author_facet Stollfuss, J.
Landvogt, N.
Abenstein, M.
Ziegler, S.
Schwaiger, M.
Senekowitsch-Schmidtke, R.
Wieder, H.
author_sort Stollfuss, J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Non-invasive imaging of peritoneal carcinomatosis remains challenging. The aim of this study was to compare positron emission tomography (PET) and bioluminescence imaging (BLI) for the early detection of peritoneal carcinomatosis in a mouse model. METHODS: Female nude mice were inoculated intraperitoneally with 1×10(7) HSC45-M2-luc gastric cancer cells. The cells were stably transfected with the gene coding for firefly luciferase. Tumour development was monitored using PET and BLI and in two subgroups, on days 3 and 4 or on days 6 and 7 after tumour cell inoculation. Tumour nodules found on post mortem examination served as the reference standard for evaluating the images. RESULTS: PET detected 58/82 lesions (sensitivity 71 %). This method detected all (100 %) nodules larger than 6 mm, 88 % of nodules in the range of >2–4 mm, and even 58 % of small nodules measuring only 1–2 mm. BLI identified a total of 40/82 lesions (sensitivity 49 %). The difference between PET and BLI was statistically significant at p < 0.05 (PET/BLI chi-square 8.2). CONCLUSIONS: PET was more sensitive than BLI for the detection of early peritoneal carcinomatosis in our mouse model. The sensitivity of BLI largely depended on the site of the lesions in relation to the imaging device.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4559549
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45595492015-09-10 Non-invasive imaging of implanted peritoneal carcinomatosis in mice using PET and bioluminescence imaging Stollfuss, J. Landvogt, N. Abenstein, M. Ziegler, S. Schwaiger, M. Senekowitsch-Schmidtke, R. Wieder, H. EJNMMI Res Original Research BACKGROUND: Non-invasive imaging of peritoneal carcinomatosis remains challenging. The aim of this study was to compare positron emission tomography (PET) and bioluminescence imaging (BLI) for the early detection of peritoneal carcinomatosis in a mouse model. METHODS: Female nude mice were inoculated intraperitoneally with 1×10(7) HSC45-M2-luc gastric cancer cells. The cells were stably transfected with the gene coding for firefly luciferase. Tumour development was monitored using PET and BLI and in two subgroups, on days 3 and 4 or on days 6 and 7 after tumour cell inoculation. Tumour nodules found on post mortem examination served as the reference standard for evaluating the images. RESULTS: PET detected 58/82 lesions (sensitivity 71 %). This method detected all (100 %) nodules larger than 6 mm, 88 % of nodules in the range of >2–4 mm, and even 58 % of small nodules measuring only 1–2 mm. BLI identified a total of 40/82 lesions (sensitivity 49 %). The difference between PET and BLI was statistically significant at p < 0.05 (PET/BLI chi-square 8.2). CONCLUSIONS: PET was more sensitive than BLI for the detection of early peritoneal carcinomatosis in our mouse model. The sensitivity of BLI largely depended on the site of the lesions in relation to the imaging device. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4559549/ /pubmed/26337805 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-015-0125-z Text en © Stollfuss et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Stollfuss, J.
Landvogt, N.
Abenstein, M.
Ziegler, S.
Schwaiger, M.
Senekowitsch-Schmidtke, R.
Wieder, H.
Non-invasive imaging of implanted peritoneal carcinomatosis in mice using PET and bioluminescence imaging
title Non-invasive imaging of implanted peritoneal carcinomatosis in mice using PET and bioluminescence imaging
title_full Non-invasive imaging of implanted peritoneal carcinomatosis in mice using PET and bioluminescence imaging
title_fullStr Non-invasive imaging of implanted peritoneal carcinomatosis in mice using PET and bioluminescence imaging
title_full_unstemmed Non-invasive imaging of implanted peritoneal carcinomatosis in mice using PET and bioluminescence imaging
title_short Non-invasive imaging of implanted peritoneal carcinomatosis in mice using PET and bioluminescence imaging
title_sort non-invasive imaging of implanted peritoneal carcinomatosis in mice using pet and bioluminescence imaging
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4559549/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26337805
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-015-0125-z
work_keys_str_mv AT stollfussj noninvasiveimagingofimplantedperitonealcarcinomatosisinmiceusingpetandbioluminescenceimaging
AT landvogtn noninvasiveimagingofimplantedperitonealcarcinomatosisinmiceusingpetandbioluminescenceimaging
AT abensteinm noninvasiveimagingofimplantedperitonealcarcinomatosisinmiceusingpetandbioluminescenceimaging
AT zieglers noninvasiveimagingofimplantedperitonealcarcinomatosisinmiceusingpetandbioluminescenceimaging
AT schwaigerm noninvasiveimagingofimplantedperitonealcarcinomatosisinmiceusingpetandbioluminescenceimaging
AT senekowitschschmidtker noninvasiveimagingofimplantedperitonealcarcinomatosisinmiceusingpetandbioluminescenceimaging
AT wiederh noninvasiveimagingofimplantedperitonealcarcinomatosisinmiceusingpetandbioluminescenceimaging