Cargando…
Comparison of Multi-Echo Dixon Methods with Volume Interpolated Breath-Hold Gradient Echo Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Fat-Signal Fraction Quantification of Paravertebral Muscle
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether multi-echo Dixon magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with simultaneous T2* estimation and correction yields more accurate fat-signal fraction (FF) measurement of the lumbar paravertebral muscles, in comparison with non-T2*-corrected two-echo Dixon or T2*-corrected three-echo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Society of Radiology
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4559780/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26357503 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2015.16.5.1086 |
_version_ | 1782388833043611648 |
---|---|
author | Yoo, Yeon Hwa Kim, Hak-Sun Lee, Young Han Yoon, Choon-Sik Paek, Mun Young Yoo, Hanna Kannengiesser, Stephan Chung, Tae-Sub Song, Ho-Taek Suh, Jin-Suck Kim, Sungjun |
author_facet | Yoo, Yeon Hwa Kim, Hak-Sun Lee, Young Han Yoon, Choon-Sik Paek, Mun Young Yoo, Hanna Kannengiesser, Stephan Chung, Tae-Sub Song, Ho-Taek Suh, Jin-Suck Kim, Sungjun |
author_sort | Yoo, Yeon Hwa |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To assess whether multi-echo Dixon magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with simultaneous T2* estimation and correction yields more accurate fat-signal fraction (FF) measurement of the lumbar paravertebral muscles, in comparison with non-T2*-corrected two-echo Dixon or T2*-corrected three-echo Dixon, using the FF measurements from single-voxel MR spectroscopy as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty patients with low back pain underwent MR imaging with a 1.5T scanner. FF mapping images automatically obtained using T2*-corrected Dixon technique with two (non-T2*-corrected), three, and six echoes, were compared with images from single-voxel MR spectroscopy at the paravertebral muscles on levels L4 through L5. FFs were measured directly by two radiologists, who independently drew the region of interest on the mapping images from the three sequences. RESULTS: A total of 117 spectroscopic measurements were performed either bilaterally (57 of 60 subjects) or unilaterally (3 of 60 subjects). The mean spectroscopic FF was 14.3 ± 11.7% (range, 1.9-63.7%). Interobserver agreement was excellent between the two radiologists. Lin's concordance correlation between the spectroscopic findings and all the imaging-based FFs were statistically significant (p < 0.001). FFs obtained from the T2*-corrected six-echo Dixon sequences showed a significantly better concordance with the spectroscopic data, with its concordance correlation coefficient being 0.99 and 0.98 (p < 0.001), as compared with two- or three-echo methods. CONCLUSION: T2*-corrected six-echo Dixon sequence would be a better option than two- or three-echo methods for noninvasive quantification of lumbar muscle fat quantification. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4559780 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | The Korean Society of Radiology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45597802015-09-09 Comparison of Multi-Echo Dixon Methods with Volume Interpolated Breath-Hold Gradient Echo Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Fat-Signal Fraction Quantification of Paravertebral Muscle Yoo, Yeon Hwa Kim, Hak-Sun Lee, Young Han Yoon, Choon-Sik Paek, Mun Young Yoo, Hanna Kannengiesser, Stephan Chung, Tae-Sub Song, Ho-Taek Suh, Jin-Suck Kim, Sungjun Korean J Radiol Musculoskeletal Imaging OBJECTIVE: To assess whether multi-echo Dixon magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with simultaneous T2* estimation and correction yields more accurate fat-signal fraction (FF) measurement of the lumbar paravertebral muscles, in comparison with non-T2*-corrected two-echo Dixon or T2*-corrected three-echo Dixon, using the FF measurements from single-voxel MR spectroscopy as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty patients with low back pain underwent MR imaging with a 1.5T scanner. FF mapping images automatically obtained using T2*-corrected Dixon technique with two (non-T2*-corrected), three, and six echoes, were compared with images from single-voxel MR spectroscopy at the paravertebral muscles on levels L4 through L5. FFs were measured directly by two radiologists, who independently drew the region of interest on the mapping images from the three sequences. RESULTS: A total of 117 spectroscopic measurements were performed either bilaterally (57 of 60 subjects) or unilaterally (3 of 60 subjects). The mean spectroscopic FF was 14.3 ± 11.7% (range, 1.9-63.7%). Interobserver agreement was excellent between the two radiologists. Lin's concordance correlation between the spectroscopic findings and all the imaging-based FFs were statistically significant (p < 0.001). FFs obtained from the T2*-corrected six-echo Dixon sequences showed a significantly better concordance with the spectroscopic data, with its concordance correlation coefficient being 0.99 and 0.98 (p < 0.001), as compared with two- or three-echo methods. CONCLUSION: T2*-corrected six-echo Dixon sequence would be a better option than two- or three-echo methods for noninvasive quantification of lumbar muscle fat quantification. The Korean Society of Radiology 2015 2015-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4559780/ /pubmed/26357503 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2015.16.5.1086 Text en Copyright © 2015 The Korean Society of Radiology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Musculoskeletal Imaging Yoo, Yeon Hwa Kim, Hak-Sun Lee, Young Han Yoon, Choon-Sik Paek, Mun Young Yoo, Hanna Kannengiesser, Stephan Chung, Tae-Sub Song, Ho-Taek Suh, Jin-Suck Kim, Sungjun Comparison of Multi-Echo Dixon Methods with Volume Interpolated Breath-Hold Gradient Echo Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Fat-Signal Fraction Quantification of Paravertebral Muscle |
title | Comparison of Multi-Echo Dixon Methods with Volume Interpolated Breath-Hold Gradient Echo Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Fat-Signal Fraction Quantification of Paravertebral Muscle |
title_full | Comparison of Multi-Echo Dixon Methods with Volume Interpolated Breath-Hold Gradient Echo Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Fat-Signal Fraction Quantification of Paravertebral Muscle |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Multi-Echo Dixon Methods with Volume Interpolated Breath-Hold Gradient Echo Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Fat-Signal Fraction Quantification of Paravertebral Muscle |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Multi-Echo Dixon Methods with Volume Interpolated Breath-Hold Gradient Echo Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Fat-Signal Fraction Quantification of Paravertebral Muscle |
title_short | Comparison of Multi-Echo Dixon Methods with Volume Interpolated Breath-Hold Gradient Echo Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Fat-Signal Fraction Quantification of Paravertebral Muscle |
title_sort | comparison of multi-echo dixon methods with volume interpolated breath-hold gradient echo magnetic resonance imaging in fat-signal fraction quantification of paravertebral muscle |
topic | Musculoskeletal Imaging |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4559780/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26357503 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2015.16.5.1086 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yooyeonhwa comparisonofmultiechodixonmethodswithvolumeinterpolatedbreathholdgradientechomagneticresonanceimaginginfatsignalfractionquantificationofparavertebralmuscle AT kimhaksun comparisonofmultiechodixonmethodswithvolumeinterpolatedbreathholdgradientechomagneticresonanceimaginginfatsignalfractionquantificationofparavertebralmuscle AT leeyounghan comparisonofmultiechodixonmethodswithvolumeinterpolatedbreathholdgradientechomagneticresonanceimaginginfatsignalfractionquantificationofparavertebralmuscle AT yoonchoonsik comparisonofmultiechodixonmethodswithvolumeinterpolatedbreathholdgradientechomagneticresonanceimaginginfatsignalfractionquantificationofparavertebralmuscle AT paekmunyoung comparisonofmultiechodixonmethodswithvolumeinterpolatedbreathholdgradientechomagneticresonanceimaginginfatsignalfractionquantificationofparavertebralmuscle AT yoohanna comparisonofmultiechodixonmethodswithvolumeinterpolatedbreathholdgradientechomagneticresonanceimaginginfatsignalfractionquantificationofparavertebralmuscle AT kannengiesserstephan comparisonofmultiechodixonmethodswithvolumeinterpolatedbreathholdgradientechomagneticresonanceimaginginfatsignalfractionquantificationofparavertebralmuscle AT chungtaesub comparisonofmultiechodixonmethodswithvolumeinterpolatedbreathholdgradientechomagneticresonanceimaginginfatsignalfractionquantificationofparavertebralmuscle AT songhotaek comparisonofmultiechodixonmethodswithvolumeinterpolatedbreathholdgradientechomagneticresonanceimaginginfatsignalfractionquantificationofparavertebralmuscle AT suhjinsuck comparisonofmultiechodixonmethodswithvolumeinterpolatedbreathholdgradientechomagneticresonanceimaginginfatsignalfractionquantificationofparavertebralmuscle AT kimsungjun comparisonofmultiechodixonmethodswithvolumeinterpolatedbreathholdgradientechomagneticresonanceimaginginfatsignalfractionquantificationofparavertebralmuscle |