Cargando…

Comparison of Multi-Echo Dixon Methods with Volume Interpolated Breath-Hold Gradient Echo Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Fat-Signal Fraction Quantification of Paravertebral Muscle

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether multi-echo Dixon magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with simultaneous T2* estimation and correction yields more accurate fat-signal fraction (FF) measurement of the lumbar paravertebral muscles, in comparison with non-T2*-corrected two-echo Dixon or T2*-corrected three-echo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yoo, Yeon Hwa, Kim, Hak-Sun, Lee, Young Han, Yoon, Choon-Sik, Paek, Mun Young, Yoo, Hanna, Kannengiesser, Stephan, Chung, Tae-Sub, Song, Ho-Taek, Suh, Jin-Suck, Kim, Sungjun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Radiology 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4559780/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26357503
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2015.16.5.1086
_version_ 1782388833043611648
author Yoo, Yeon Hwa
Kim, Hak-Sun
Lee, Young Han
Yoon, Choon-Sik
Paek, Mun Young
Yoo, Hanna
Kannengiesser, Stephan
Chung, Tae-Sub
Song, Ho-Taek
Suh, Jin-Suck
Kim, Sungjun
author_facet Yoo, Yeon Hwa
Kim, Hak-Sun
Lee, Young Han
Yoon, Choon-Sik
Paek, Mun Young
Yoo, Hanna
Kannengiesser, Stephan
Chung, Tae-Sub
Song, Ho-Taek
Suh, Jin-Suck
Kim, Sungjun
author_sort Yoo, Yeon Hwa
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess whether multi-echo Dixon magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with simultaneous T2* estimation and correction yields more accurate fat-signal fraction (FF) measurement of the lumbar paravertebral muscles, in comparison with non-T2*-corrected two-echo Dixon or T2*-corrected three-echo Dixon, using the FF measurements from single-voxel MR spectroscopy as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty patients with low back pain underwent MR imaging with a 1.5T scanner. FF mapping images automatically obtained using T2*-corrected Dixon technique with two (non-T2*-corrected), three, and six echoes, were compared with images from single-voxel MR spectroscopy at the paravertebral muscles on levels L4 through L5. FFs were measured directly by two radiologists, who independently drew the region of interest on the mapping images from the three sequences. RESULTS: A total of 117 spectroscopic measurements were performed either bilaterally (57 of 60 subjects) or unilaterally (3 of 60 subjects). The mean spectroscopic FF was 14.3 ± 11.7% (range, 1.9-63.7%). Interobserver agreement was excellent between the two radiologists. Lin's concordance correlation between the spectroscopic findings and all the imaging-based FFs were statistically significant (p < 0.001). FFs obtained from the T2*-corrected six-echo Dixon sequences showed a significantly better concordance with the spectroscopic data, with its concordance correlation coefficient being 0.99 and 0.98 (p < 0.001), as compared with two- or three-echo methods. CONCLUSION: T2*-corrected six-echo Dixon sequence would be a better option than two- or three-echo methods for noninvasive quantification of lumbar muscle fat quantification.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4559780
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher The Korean Society of Radiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45597802015-09-09 Comparison of Multi-Echo Dixon Methods with Volume Interpolated Breath-Hold Gradient Echo Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Fat-Signal Fraction Quantification of Paravertebral Muscle Yoo, Yeon Hwa Kim, Hak-Sun Lee, Young Han Yoon, Choon-Sik Paek, Mun Young Yoo, Hanna Kannengiesser, Stephan Chung, Tae-Sub Song, Ho-Taek Suh, Jin-Suck Kim, Sungjun Korean J Radiol Musculoskeletal Imaging OBJECTIVE: To assess whether multi-echo Dixon magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with simultaneous T2* estimation and correction yields more accurate fat-signal fraction (FF) measurement of the lumbar paravertebral muscles, in comparison with non-T2*-corrected two-echo Dixon or T2*-corrected three-echo Dixon, using the FF measurements from single-voxel MR spectroscopy as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty patients with low back pain underwent MR imaging with a 1.5T scanner. FF mapping images automatically obtained using T2*-corrected Dixon technique with two (non-T2*-corrected), three, and six echoes, were compared with images from single-voxel MR spectroscopy at the paravertebral muscles on levels L4 through L5. FFs were measured directly by two radiologists, who independently drew the region of interest on the mapping images from the three sequences. RESULTS: A total of 117 spectroscopic measurements were performed either bilaterally (57 of 60 subjects) or unilaterally (3 of 60 subjects). The mean spectroscopic FF was 14.3 ± 11.7% (range, 1.9-63.7%). Interobserver agreement was excellent between the two radiologists. Lin's concordance correlation between the spectroscopic findings and all the imaging-based FFs were statistically significant (p < 0.001). FFs obtained from the T2*-corrected six-echo Dixon sequences showed a significantly better concordance with the spectroscopic data, with its concordance correlation coefficient being 0.99 and 0.98 (p < 0.001), as compared with two- or three-echo methods. CONCLUSION: T2*-corrected six-echo Dixon sequence would be a better option than two- or three-echo methods for noninvasive quantification of lumbar muscle fat quantification. The Korean Society of Radiology 2015 2015-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4559780/ /pubmed/26357503 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2015.16.5.1086 Text en Copyright © 2015 The Korean Society of Radiology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Musculoskeletal Imaging
Yoo, Yeon Hwa
Kim, Hak-Sun
Lee, Young Han
Yoon, Choon-Sik
Paek, Mun Young
Yoo, Hanna
Kannengiesser, Stephan
Chung, Tae-Sub
Song, Ho-Taek
Suh, Jin-Suck
Kim, Sungjun
Comparison of Multi-Echo Dixon Methods with Volume Interpolated Breath-Hold Gradient Echo Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Fat-Signal Fraction Quantification of Paravertebral Muscle
title Comparison of Multi-Echo Dixon Methods with Volume Interpolated Breath-Hold Gradient Echo Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Fat-Signal Fraction Quantification of Paravertebral Muscle
title_full Comparison of Multi-Echo Dixon Methods with Volume Interpolated Breath-Hold Gradient Echo Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Fat-Signal Fraction Quantification of Paravertebral Muscle
title_fullStr Comparison of Multi-Echo Dixon Methods with Volume Interpolated Breath-Hold Gradient Echo Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Fat-Signal Fraction Quantification of Paravertebral Muscle
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Multi-Echo Dixon Methods with Volume Interpolated Breath-Hold Gradient Echo Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Fat-Signal Fraction Quantification of Paravertebral Muscle
title_short Comparison of Multi-Echo Dixon Methods with Volume Interpolated Breath-Hold Gradient Echo Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Fat-Signal Fraction Quantification of Paravertebral Muscle
title_sort comparison of multi-echo dixon methods with volume interpolated breath-hold gradient echo magnetic resonance imaging in fat-signal fraction quantification of paravertebral muscle
topic Musculoskeletal Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4559780/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26357503
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2015.16.5.1086
work_keys_str_mv AT yooyeonhwa comparisonofmultiechodixonmethodswithvolumeinterpolatedbreathholdgradientechomagneticresonanceimaginginfatsignalfractionquantificationofparavertebralmuscle
AT kimhaksun comparisonofmultiechodixonmethodswithvolumeinterpolatedbreathholdgradientechomagneticresonanceimaginginfatsignalfractionquantificationofparavertebralmuscle
AT leeyounghan comparisonofmultiechodixonmethodswithvolumeinterpolatedbreathholdgradientechomagneticresonanceimaginginfatsignalfractionquantificationofparavertebralmuscle
AT yoonchoonsik comparisonofmultiechodixonmethodswithvolumeinterpolatedbreathholdgradientechomagneticresonanceimaginginfatsignalfractionquantificationofparavertebralmuscle
AT paekmunyoung comparisonofmultiechodixonmethodswithvolumeinterpolatedbreathholdgradientechomagneticresonanceimaginginfatsignalfractionquantificationofparavertebralmuscle
AT yoohanna comparisonofmultiechodixonmethodswithvolumeinterpolatedbreathholdgradientechomagneticresonanceimaginginfatsignalfractionquantificationofparavertebralmuscle
AT kannengiesserstephan comparisonofmultiechodixonmethodswithvolumeinterpolatedbreathholdgradientechomagneticresonanceimaginginfatsignalfractionquantificationofparavertebralmuscle
AT chungtaesub comparisonofmultiechodixonmethodswithvolumeinterpolatedbreathholdgradientechomagneticresonanceimaginginfatsignalfractionquantificationofparavertebralmuscle
AT songhotaek comparisonofmultiechodixonmethodswithvolumeinterpolatedbreathholdgradientechomagneticresonanceimaginginfatsignalfractionquantificationofparavertebralmuscle
AT suhjinsuck comparisonofmultiechodixonmethodswithvolumeinterpolatedbreathholdgradientechomagneticresonanceimaginginfatsignalfractionquantificationofparavertebralmuscle
AT kimsungjun comparisonofmultiechodixonmethodswithvolumeinterpolatedbreathholdgradientechomagneticresonanceimaginginfatsignalfractionquantificationofparavertebralmuscle