Cargando…
Pregnant womens’ concerns when invited to a randomized trial: a qualitative case control study
BACKGROUND: Pregnant women were excluded from clinical trials until the 1990s, but the Food and Drug Administration nowadays allows - and even encourages - responsible inclusion of pregnant women in trials with adequate safety monitoring. Still, randomized trials in pregnant women face specific enro...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4560072/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26341516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0641-x |
_version_ | 1782388871112163328 |
---|---|
author | Oude Rengerink, Katrien Logtenberg, Sabine Hooft, Lotty Bossuyt, Patrick M. Mol, Ben Willem |
author_facet | Oude Rengerink, Katrien Logtenberg, Sabine Hooft, Lotty Bossuyt, Patrick M. Mol, Ben Willem |
author_sort | Oude Rengerink, Katrien |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Pregnant women were excluded from clinical trials until the 1990s, but the Food and Drug Administration nowadays allows - and even encourages - responsible inclusion of pregnant women in trials with adequate safety monitoring. Still, randomized trials in pregnant women face specific enrolment challenges. Previous studies have focused on barriers to trial participation in studies that had failed to recruit sufficient participants. Our aim was to identify barriers and motivators for participation in a range of clinical trials being conducted in the Netherlands, regardless of recruitment performance. METHODS: We performed a qualitative case control study in women who had been asked in 2010 to participate in one of eight clinical trials during pregnancy or shortly after giving birth. Both participants and non-participants of these clinical trials were invited for a face-to-face interview that addressed motives for participation and non-participation. We started the interview in an open fashion, asking the women for their main motive for participation or non-participation. When no new information emerged in this open part, we continued with a semi-structured interview, guided by a topic list. Transcripts of the interviews were analysed using a constant-comparative approach. Two researchers identified barriers and facilitators for participation, conjoined into main themes. RESULTS: Of 28 women invited for the interview, 21 agreed to be interviewed (12 participants and 9 non-participants). For 5 of the 12 participants, contribution to scientific research was their main motive, while 5 had participated because the intervention seemed favorable and was not available outside the trial. Key motives for non-participation (n = 9) were a negative association or a dislike of the intervention, either because it might do harm (n = 6) or for practical reasons (n = 3). Combining the open and topic list guided interviews we constructed seven main themes that influence the pregnant women’s decision to participate: external influence, research and healthcare, perception own situation, study design, intervention, information and counselling, and uncertainty. CONCLUSIONS: Among seven main themes that influence pregnant women’s decision to participate, uncertainty about scientific research or the intervention was reported to be of considerable importance. Measures should be taken to habituate pregnant women more to scientific research, and further evaluation of opt-out consent deserves attention. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12884-015-0641-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4560072 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45600722015-09-05 Pregnant womens’ concerns when invited to a randomized trial: a qualitative case control study Oude Rengerink, Katrien Logtenberg, Sabine Hooft, Lotty Bossuyt, Patrick M. Mol, Ben Willem BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Pregnant women were excluded from clinical trials until the 1990s, but the Food and Drug Administration nowadays allows - and even encourages - responsible inclusion of pregnant women in trials with adequate safety monitoring. Still, randomized trials in pregnant women face specific enrolment challenges. Previous studies have focused on barriers to trial participation in studies that had failed to recruit sufficient participants. Our aim was to identify barriers and motivators for participation in a range of clinical trials being conducted in the Netherlands, regardless of recruitment performance. METHODS: We performed a qualitative case control study in women who had been asked in 2010 to participate in one of eight clinical trials during pregnancy or shortly after giving birth. Both participants and non-participants of these clinical trials were invited for a face-to-face interview that addressed motives for participation and non-participation. We started the interview in an open fashion, asking the women for their main motive for participation or non-participation. When no new information emerged in this open part, we continued with a semi-structured interview, guided by a topic list. Transcripts of the interviews were analysed using a constant-comparative approach. Two researchers identified barriers and facilitators for participation, conjoined into main themes. RESULTS: Of 28 women invited for the interview, 21 agreed to be interviewed (12 participants and 9 non-participants). For 5 of the 12 participants, contribution to scientific research was their main motive, while 5 had participated because the intervention seemed favorable and was not available outside the trial. Key motives for non-participation (n = 9) were a negative association or a dislike of the intervention, either because it might do harm (n = 6) or for practical reasons (n = 3). Combining the open and topic list guided interviews we constructed seven main themes that influence the pregnant women’s decision to participate: external influence, research and healthcare, perception own situation, study design, intervention, information and counselling, and uncertainty. CONCLUSIONS: Among seven main themes that influence pregnant women’s decision to participate, uncertainty about scientific research or the intervention was reported to be of considerable importance. Measures should be taken to habituate pregnant women more to scientific research, and further evaluation of opt-out consent deserves attention. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12884-015-0641-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4560072/ /pubmed/26341516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0641-x Text en © Oude Rengerink et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Oude Rengerink, Katrien Logtenberg, Sabine Hooft, Lotty Bossuyt, Patrick M. Mol, Ben Willem Pregnant womens’ concerns when invited to a randomized trial: a qualitative case control study |
title | Pregnant womens’ concerns when invited to a randomized trial: a qualitative case control study |
title_full | Pregnant womens’ concerns when invited to a randomized trial: a qualitative case control study |
title_fullStr | Pregnant womens’ concerns when invited to a randomized trial: a qualitative case control study |
title_full_unstemmed | Pregnant womens’ concerns when invited to a randomized trial: a qualitative case control study |
title_short | Pregnant womens’ concerns when invited to a randomized trial: a qualitative case control study |
title_sort | pregnant womens’ concerns when invited to a randomized trial: a qualitative case control study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4560072/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26341516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0641-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ouderengerinkkatrien pregnantwomensconcernswheninvitedtoarandomizedtrialaqualitativecasecontrolstudy AT logtenbergsabine pregnantwomensconcernswheninvitedtoarandomizedtrialaqualitativecasecontrolstudy AT hooftlotty pregnantwomensconcernswheninvitedtoarandomizedtrialaqualitativecasecontrolstudy AT bossuytpatrickm pregnantwomensconcernswheninvitedtoarandomizedtrialaqualitativecasecontrolstudy AT molbenwillem pregnantwomensconcernswheninvitedtoarandomizedtrialaqualitativecasecontrolstudy |