Cargando…

Pregnant womens’ concerns when invited to a randomized trial: a qualitative case control study

BACKGROUND: Pregnant women were excluded from clinical trials until the 1990s, but the Food and Drug Administration nowadays allows - and even encourages - responsible inclusion of pregnant women in trials with adequate safety monitoring. Still, randomized trials in pregnant women face specific enro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oude Rengerink, Katrien, Logtenberg, Sabine, Hooft, Lotty, Bossuyt, Patrick M., Mol, Ben Willem
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4560072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26341516
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0641-x
_version_ 1782388871112163328
author Oude Rengerink, Katrien
Logtenberg, Sabine
Hooft, Lotty
Bossuyt, Patrick M.
Mol, Ben Willem
author_facet Oude Rengerink, Katrien
Logtenberg, Sabine
Hooft, Lotty
Bossuyt, Patrick M.
Mol, Ben Willem
author_sort Oude Rengerink, Katrien
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pregnant women were excluded from clinical trials until the 1990s, but the Food and Drug Administration nowadays allows - and even encourages - responsible inclusion of pregnant women in trials with adequate safety monitoring. Still, randomized trials in pregnant women face specific enrolment challenges. Previous studies have focused on barriers to trial participation in studies that had failed to recruit sufficient participants. Our aim was to identify barriers and motivators for participation in a range of clinical trials being conducted in the Netherlands, regardless of recruitment performance. METHODS: We performed a qualitative case control study in women who had been asked in 2010 to participate in one of eight clinical trials during pregnancy or shortly after giving birth. Both participants and non-participants of these clinical trials were invited for a face-to-face interview that addressed motives for participation and non-participation. We started the interview in an open fashion, asking the women for their main motive for participation or non-participation. When no new information emerged in this open part, we continued with a semi-structured interview, guided by a topic list. Transcripts of the interviews were analysed using a constant-comparative approach. Two researchers identified barriers and facilitators for participation, conjoined into main themes. RESULTS: Of 28 women invited for the interview, 21 agreed to be interviewed (12 participants and 9 non-participants). For 5 of the 12 participants, contribution to scientific research was their main motive, while 5 had participated because the intervention seemed favorable and was not available outside the trial. Key motives for non-participation (n = 9) were a negative association or a dislike of the intervention, either because it might do harm (n = 6) or for practical reasons (n = 3). Combining the open and topic list guided interviews we constructed seven main themes that influence the pregnant women’s decision to participate: external influence, research and healthcare, perception own situation, study design, intervention, information and counselling, and uncertainty. CONCLUSIONS: Among seven main themes that influence pregnant women’s decision to participate, uncertainty about scientific research or the intervention was reported to be of considerable importance. Measures should be taken to habituate pregnant women more to scientific research, and further evaluation of opt-out consent deserves attention. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12884-015-0641-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4560072
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45600722015-09-05 Pregnant womens’ concerns when invited to a randomized trial: a qualitative case control study Oude Rengerink, Katrien Logtenberg, Sabine Hooft, Lotty Bossuyt, Patrick M. Mol, Ben Willem BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Pregnant women were excluded from clinical trials until the 1990s, but the Food and Drug Administration nowadays allows - and even encourages - responsible inclusion of pregnant women in trials with adequate safety monitoring. Still, randomized trials in pregnant women face specific enrolment challenges. Previous studies have focused on barriers to trial participation in studies that had failed to recruit sufficient participants. Our aim was to identify barriers and motivators for participation in a range of clinical trials being conducted in the Netherlands, regardless of recruitment performance. METHODS: We performed a qualitative case control study in women who had been asked in 2010 to participate in one of eight clinical trials during pregnancy or shortly after giving birth. Both participants and non-participants of these clinical trials were invited for a face-to-face interview that addressed motives for participation and non-participation. We started the interview in an open fashion, asking the women for their main motive for participation or non-participation. When no new information emerged in this open part, we continued with a semi-structured interview, guided by a topic list. Transcripts of the interviews were analysed using a constant-comparative approach. Two researchers identified barriers and facilitators for participation, conjoined into main themes. RESULTS: Of 28 women invited for the interview, 21 agreed to be interviewed (12 participants and 9 non-participants). For 5 of the 12 participants, contribution to scientific research was their main motive, while 5 had participated because the intervention seemed favorable and was not available outside the trial. Key motives for non-participation (n = 9) were a negative association or a dislike of the intervention, either because it might do harm (n = 6) or for practical reasons (n = 3). Combining the open and topic list guided interviews we constructed seven main themes that influence the pregnant women’s decision to participate: external influence, research and healthcare, perception own situation, study design, intervention, information and counselling, and uncertainty. CONCLUSIONS: Among seven main themes that influence pregnant women’s decision to participate, uncertainty about scientific research or the intervention was reported to be of considerable importance. Measures should be taken to habituate pregnant women more to scientific research, and further evaluation of opt-out consent deserves attention. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12884-015-0641-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4560072/ /pubmed/26341516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0641-x Text en © Oude Rengerink et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Oude Rengerink, Katrien
Logtenberg, Sabine
Hooft, Lotty
Bossuyt, Patrick M.
Mol, Ben Willem
Pregnant womens’ concerns when invited to a randomized trial: a qualitative case control study
title Pregnant womens’ concerns when invited to a randomized trial: a qualitative case control study
title_full Pregnant womens’ concerns when invited to a randomized trial: a qualitative case control study
title_fullStr Pregnant womens’ concerns when invited to a randomized trial: a qualitative case control study
title_full_unstemmed Pregnant womens’ concerns when invited to a randomized trial: a qualitative case control study
title_short Pregnant womens’ concerns when invited to a randomized trial: a qualitative case control study
title_sort pregnant womens’ concerns when invited to a randomized trial: a qualitative case control study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4560072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26341516
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0641-x
work_keys_str_mv AT ouderengerinkkatrien pregnantwomensconcernswheninvitedtoarandomizedtrialaqualitativecasecontrolstudy
AT logtenbergsabine pregnantwomensconcernswheninvitedtoarandomizedtrialaqualitativecasecontrolstudy
AT hooftlotty pregnantwomensconcernswheninvitedtoarandomizedtrialaqualitativecasecontrolstudy
AT bossuytpatrickm pregnantwomensconcernswheninvitedtoarandomizedtrialaqualitativecasecontrolstudy
AT molbenwillem pregnantwomensconcernswheninvitedtoarandomizedtrialaqualitativecasecontrolstudy