Cargando…

Evaluation of AirXpanders for Breast Reconstruction: Early Experience from Sydney

AIM: Two-staged prosthetic breast reconstruction has become a popular option involving a series of saline injections to expanders to create a pocket large enough for a permanent implant. This, however, requires frequent visits to the surgeon and numerous needle pricks with potential infection risk....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hsieh, Frank, Lam, Thomas C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4560228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26495208
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000471
_version_ 1782388891496480768
author Hsieh, Frank
Lam, Thomas C.
author_facet Hsieh, Frank
Lam, Thomas C.
author_sort Hsieh, Frank
collection PubMed
description AIM: Two-staged prosthetic breast reconstruction has become a popular option involving a series of saline injections to expanders to create a pocket large enough for a permanent implant. This, however, requires frequent visits to the surgeon and numerous needle pricks with potential infection risk. A new form of tissue expander, the AirXpanders, has recently been trialed in Perth and the United States. It uses a remote-controlled release of compressed CO(2) where needle punctures are avoided. METHODOLOGY: Prospective data were collected on the first 10 patients to have the AirXpanders implant inserted for breast reconstruction at Western Sydney. The implants were inserted subpectorally as the saline expanders, and patients were instructed how to use the remote 4 weeks postoperation. RESULTS: Ten patients (4 immediate and 6 delayed) aged between 30 and 65 (mean, 48.3 years) underwent 14 AirXpanders insertions. One patient passed away due to metastatic malignancy. With the remaining patients, the average period of active expansion was 15.8 days (r, 6–21). The average size of final implant used was 451 g (r, 195–685). The only complications were 2 seromas. CONCLUSION: Our early results are consistent with the Perth trial. The new AirXpanders is safe to use and able to achieve satisfactory tissue expansion faster than saline expander. It also has the advantage of patient self-controlled without the need for multiple medical reviews and needle punctures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4560228
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45602282015-10-22 Evaluation of AirXpanders for Breast Reconstruction: Early Experience from Sydney Hsieh, Frank Lam, Thomas C. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article AIM: Two-staged prosthetic breast reconstruction has become a popular option involving a series of saline injections to expanders to create a pocket large enough for a permanent implant. This, however, requires frequent visits to the surgeon and numerous needle pricks with potential infection risk. A new form of tissue expander, the AirXpanders, has recently been trialed in Perth and the United States. It uses a remote-controlled release of compressed CO(2) where needle punctures are avoided. METHODOLOGY: Prospective data were collected on the first 10 patients to have the AirXpanders implant inserted for breast reconstruction at Western Sydney. The implants were inserted subpectorally as the saline expanders, and patients were instructed how to use the remote 4 weeks postoperation. RESULTS: Ten patients (4 immediate and 6 delayed) aged between 30 and 65 (mean, 48.3 years) underwent 14 AirXpanders insertions. One patient passed away due to metastatic malignancy. With the remaining patients, the average period of active expansion was 15.8 days (r, 6–21). The average size of final implant used was 451 g (r, 195–685). The only complications were 2 seromas. CONCLUSION: Our early results are consistent with the Perth trial. The new AirXpanders is safe to use and able to achieve satisfactory tissue expansion faster than saline expander. It also has the advantage of patient self-controlled without the need for multiple medical reviews and needle punctures. Wolters Kluwer Health 2015-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4560228/ /pubmed/26495208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000471 Text en Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially.
spellingShingle Original Article
Hsieh, Frank
Lam, Thomas C.
Evaluation of AirXpanders for Breast Reconstruction: Early Experience from Sydney
title Evaluation of AirXpanders for Breast Reconstruction: Early Experience from Sydney
title_full Evaluation of AirXpanders for Breast Reconstruction: Early Experience from Sydney
title_fullStr Evaluation of AirXpanders for Breast Reconstruction: Early Experience from Sydney
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of AirXpanders for Breast Reconstruction: Early Experience from Sydney
title_short Evaluation of AirXpanders for Breast Reconstruction: Early Experience from Sydney
title_sort evaluation of airxpanders for breast reconstruction: early experience from sydney
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4560228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26495208
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000471
work_keys_str_mv AT hsiehfrank evaluationofairxpandersforbreastreconstructionearlyexperiencefromsydney
AT lamthomasc evaluationofairxpandersforbreastreconstructionearlyexperiencefromsydney