Cargando…

Prospective comparison of RT-PCR/ESI-MS to Prodesse ProFlu Plus and Cepheid GenXpert for the detection of Influenza A and B viruses

RT-PCR/ESI-MS has previously demonstrated the capability to detect and identify respiratory viral pathogens in nasopharyngeal swabs. This study expands on previous research by performing a prospective evaluation of RT-PCR/ESI-MS to detect and identify Influenza A and B viruses compared to Prodesse P...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hardick, Justin, Dugas, Andrea, Goheen, Joshua, Rothman, Richard, Gaydos, Charlotte
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier B.V. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4560249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25681525
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2015.01.002
_version_ 1782388893278011392
author Hardick, Justin
Dugas, Andrea
Goheen, Joshua
Rothman, Richard
Gaydos, Charlotte
author_facet Hardick, Justin
Dugas, Andrea
Goheen, Joshua
Rothman, Richard
Gaydos, Charlotte
author_sort Hardick, Justin
collection PubMed
description RT-PCR/ESI-MS has previously demonstrated the capability to detect and identify respiratory viral pathogens in nasopharyngeal swabs. This study expands on previous research by performing a prospective evaluation of RT-PCR/ESI-MS to detect and identify Influenza A and B viruses compared to Prodesse ProFlu Plus and combined ProFlu Plus and Cepheid Xpert Flu. ProFlu Plus was also used as a gold standard for comparison for respiratory syncytial virus detection. Using ProFlu Plus as a gold standard, RT-PCR/ESI-MS had sensitivity and specificity of 82.1% (23/28) and 100% (258/258), respectively, for Influenza A, 100% (16/16) and 99.6% (269/270), respectively for Influenza B, and 88.6% (39/44) and 99.6% (241/242) for any Influenza virus. Using matching results from ProFlu Plus and Xpert Flu as a gold standard, RT-PCR/ESI-MS had 85.2% (23/27) and 100% (259/259) sensitivity and specificity respectively for Influenza A, 100% (14/14) and 99.6% (270/272), respectively for Influenza B virus. Overall, RT-PCR/ESI-MS was not as sensitive as the combined gold standard of ProFlu Plus and Xpert Flu, although it has the capability of detecting other respiratory viruses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4560249
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Elsevier B.V.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45602492015-09-04 Prospective comparison of RT-PCR/ESI-MS to Prodesse ProFlu Plus and Cepheid GenXpert for the detection of Influenza A and B viruses Hardick, Justin Dugas, Andrea Goheen, Joshua Rothman, Richard Gaydos, Charlotte J Virol Methods Article RT-PCR/ESI-MS has previously demonstrated the capability to detect and identify respiratory viral pathogens in nasopharyngeal swabs. This study expands on previous research by performing a prospective evaluation of RT-PCR/ESI-MS to detect and identify Influenza A and B viruses compared to Prodesse ProFlu Plus and combined ProFlu Plus and Cepheid Xpert Flu. ProFlu Plus was also used as a gold standard for comparison for respiratory syncytial virus detection. Using ProFlu Plus as a gold standard, RT-PCR/ESI-MS had sensitivity and specificity of 82.1% (23/28) and 100% (258/258), respectively, for Influenza A, 100% (16/16) and 99.6% (269/270), respectively for Influenza B, and 88.6% (39/44) and 99.6% (241/242) for any Influenza virus. Using matching results from ProFlu Plus and Xpert Flu as a gold standard, RT-PCR/ESI-MS had 85.2% (23/27) and 100% (259/259) sensitivity and specificity respectively for Influenza A, 100% (14/14) and 99.6% (270/272), respectively for Influenza B virus. Overall, RT-PCR/ESI-MS was not as sensitive as the combined gold standard of ProFlu Plus and Xpert Flu, although it has the capability of detecting other respiratory viruses. Elsevier B.V. 2015-03-15 2015-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4560249/ /pubmed/25681525 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2015.01.002 Text en Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Hardick, Justin
Dugas, Andrea
Goheen, Joshua
Rothman, Richard
Gaydos, Charlotte
Prospective comparison of RT-PCR/ESI-MS to Prodesse ProFlu Plus and Cepheid GenXpert for the detection of Influenza A and B viruses
title Prospective comparison of RT-PCR/ESI-MS to Prodesse ProFlu Plus and Cepheid GenXpert for the detection of Influenza A and B viruses
title_full Prospective comparison of RT-PCR/ESI-MS to Prodesse ProFlu Plus and Cepheid GenXpert for the detection of Influenza A and B viruses
title_fullStr Prospective comparison of RT-PCR/ESI-MS to Prodesse ProFlu Plus and Cepheid GenXpert for the detection of Influenza A and B viruses
title_full_unstemmed Prospective comparison of RT-PCR/ESI-MS to Prodesse ProFlu Plus and Cepheid GenXpert for the detection of Influenza A and B viruses
title_short Prospective comparison of RT-PCR/ESI-MS to Prodesse ProFlu Plus and Cepheid GenXpert for the detection of Influenza A and B viruses
title_sort prospective comparison of rt-pcr/esi-ms to prodesse proflu plus and cepheid genxpert for the detection of influenza a and b viruses
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4560249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25681525
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2015.01.002
work_keys_str_mv AT hardickjustin prospectivecomparisonofrtpcresimstoprodesseprofluplusandcepheidgenxpertforthedetectionofinfluenzaaandbviruses
AT dugasandrea prospectivecomparisonofrtpcresimstoprodesseprofluplusandcepheidgenxpertforthedetectionofinfluenzaaandbviruses
AT goheenjoshua prospectivecomparisonofrtpcresimstoprodesseprofluplusandcepheidgenxpertforthedetectionofinfluenzaaandbviruses
AT rothmanrichard prospectivecomparisonofrtpcresimstoprodesseprofluplusandcepheidgenxpertforthedetectionofinfluenzaaandbviruses
AT gaydoscharlotte prospectivecomparisonofrtpcresimstoprodesseprofluplusandcepheidgenxpertforthedetectionofinfluenzaaandbviruses