Cargando…
Prospective comparison of RT-PCR/ESI-MS to Prodesse ProFlu Plus and Cepheid GenXpert for the detection of Influenza A and B viruses
RT-PCR/ESI-MS has previously demonstrated the capability to detect and identify respiratory viral pathogens in nasopharyngeal swabs. This study expands on previous research by performing a prospective evaluation of RT-PCR/ESI-MS to detect and identify Influenza A and B viruses compared to Prodesse P...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier B.V.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4560249/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25681525 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2015.01.002 |
_version_ | 1782388893278011392 |
---|---|
author | Hardick, Justin Dugas, Andrea Goheen, Joshua Rothman, Richard Gaydos, Charlotte |
author_facet | Hardick, Justin Dugas, Andrea Goheen, Joshua Rothman, Richard Gaydos, Charlotte |
author_sort | Hardick, Justin |
collection | PubMed |
description | RT-PCR/ESI-MS has previously demonstrated the capability to detect and identify respiratory viral pathogens in nasopharyngeal swabs. This study expands on previous research by performing a prospective evaluation of RT-PCR/ESI-MS to detect and identify Influenza A and B viruses compared to Prodesse ProFlu Plus and combined ProFlu Plus and Cepheid Xpert Flu. ProFlu Plus was also used as a gold standard for comparison for respiratory syncytial virus detection. Using ProFlu Plus as a gold standard, RT-PCR/ESI-MS had sensitivity and specificity of 82.1% (23/28) and 100% (258/258), respectively, for Influenza A, 100% (16/16) and 99.6% (269/270), respectively for Influenza B, and 88.6% (39/44) and 99.6% (241/242) for any Influenza virus. Using matching results from ProFlu Plus and Xpert Flu as a gold standard, RT-PCR/ESI-MS had 85.2% (23/27) and 100% (259/259) sensitivity and specificity respectively for Influenza A, 100% (14/14) and 99.6% (270/272), respectively for Influenza B virus. Overall, RT-PCR/ESI-MS was not as sensitive as the combined gold standard of ProFlu Plus and Xpert Flu, although it has the capability of detecting other respiratory viruses. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4560249 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Elsevier B.V. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45602492015-09-04 Prospective comparison of RT-PCR/ESI-MS to Prodesse ProFlu Plus and Cepheid GenXpert for the detection of Influenza A and B viruses Hardick, Justin Dugas, Andrea Goheen, Joshua Rothman, Richard Gaydos, Charlotte J Virol Methods Article RT-PCR/ESI-MS has previously demonstrated the capability to detect and identify respiratory viral pathogens in nasopharyngeal swabs. This study expands on previous research by performing a prospective evaluation of RT-PCR/ESI-MS to detect and identify Influenza A and B viruses compared to Prodesse ProFlu Plus and combined ProFlu Plus and Cepheid Xpert Flu. ProFlu Plus was also used as a gold standard for comparison for respiratory syncytial virus detection. Using ProFlu Plus as a gold standard, RT-PCR/ESI-MS had sensitivity and specificity of 82.1% (23/28) and 100% (258/258), respectively, for Influenza A, 100% (16/16) and 99.6% (269/270), respectively for Influenza B, and 88.6% (39/44) and 99.6% (241/242) for any Influenza virus. Using matching results from ProFlu Plus and Xpert Flu as a gold standard, RT-PCR/ESI-MS had 85.2% (23/27) and 100% (259/259) sensitivity and specificity respectively for Influenza A, 100% (14/14) and 99.6% (270/272), respectively for Influenza B virus. Overall, RT-PCR/ESI-MS was not as sensitive as the combined gold standard of ProFlu Plus and Xpert Flu, although it has the capability of detecting other respiratory viruses. Elsevier B.V. 2015-03-15 2015-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4560249/ /pubmed/25681525 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2015.01.002 Text en Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Hardick, Justin Dugas, Andrea Goheen, Joshua Rothman, Richard Gaydos, Charlotte Prospective comparison of RT-PCR/ESI-MS to Prodesse ProFlu Plus and Cepheid GenXpert for the detection of Influenza A and B viruses |
title | Prospective comparison of RT-PCR/ESI-MS to Prodesse ProFlu Plus and Cepheid GenXpert for the detection of Influenza A and B viruses |
title_full | Prospective comparison of RT-PCR/ESI-MS to Prodesse ProFlu Plus and Cepheid GenXpert for the detection of Influenza A and B viruses |
title_fullStr | Prospective comparison of RT-PCR/ESI-MS to Prodesse ProFlu Plus and Cepheid GenXpert for the detection of Influenza A and B viruses |
title_full_unstemmed | Prospective comparison of RT-PCR/ESI-MS to Prodesse ProFlu Plus and Cepheid GenXpert for the detection of Influenza A and B viruses |
title_short | Prospective comparison of RT-PCR/ESI-MS to Prodesse ProFlu Plus and Cepheid GenXpert for the detection of Influenza A and B viruses |
title_sort | prospective comparison of rt-pcr/esi-ms to prodesse proflu plus and cepheid genxpert for the detection of influenza a and b viruses |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4560249/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25681525 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2015.01.002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hardickjustin prospectivecomparisonofrtpcresimstoprodesseprofluplusandcepheidgenxpertforthedetectionofinfluenzaaandbviruses AT dugasandrea prospectivecomparisonofrtpcresimstoprodesseprofluplusandcepheidgenxpertforthedetectionofinfluenzaaandbviruses AT goheenjoshua prospectivecomparisonofrtpcresimstoprodesseprofluplusandcepheidgenxpertforthedetectionofinfluenzaaandbviruses AT rothmanrichard prospectivecomparisonofrtpcresimstoprodesseprofluplusandcepheidgenxpertforthedetectionofinfluenzaaandbviruses AT gaydoscharlotte prospectivecomparisonofrtpcresimstoprodesseprofluplusandcepheidgenxpertforthedetectionofinfluenzaaandbviruses |