Cargando…

Evaluation of the Pharmacokinetics and Renal Excretion of Simeprevir in Subjects with Renal Impairment

BACKGROUND: Simeprevir is a N3/4 protease inhibitor approved for the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. HCV prevalence is higher in patients with chronic kidney disease compared with the general population; safe and efficacious therapies in renal impairment are needed. OBJECTIVES: To ev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ouwerkerk-Mahadevan, Sivi, Beumont-Mauviel, Maria, Mortier, Steven, Peeters, Monika, Verloes, Rene, Truyers, Carla, Mannens, Geert, Wynant, Inneke, Simion, Alexandru
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4561054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26248593
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40268-015-0101-0
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Simeprevir is a N3/4 protease inhibitor approved for the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. HCV prevalence is higher in patients with chronic kidney disease compared with the general population; safe and efficacious therapies in renal impairment are needed. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate simeprevir renal excretion in healthy subjects and to compare the simeprevir steady-state pharmacokinetics between subjects with severe renal impairment and healthy subjects. METHODS: In the mass balance study, healthy adults received a single 200-mg dose of (14)C-simeprevir; radioactivity in the urine and feces was quantified until concentrations were <2 % of the administered dose and seven or more stools were produced. In the pharmacokinetic study, non-HCV-infected adults with severe renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤29 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) and matched healthy subjects (estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥80 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) received 150 mg simeprevir for 7 days. Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed post-dose on Day 7. RESULTS: (14)C-simeprevir recovery from the urine was low (0.009–0.138 % of total dose). The minimum plasma concentration, maximum plasma concentration, and area under the plasma concentration-time curve at 24 h were 71, 34, and 62 % higher, respectively, in subjects with severe renal impairment compared with healthy subjects. The mean fraction of simeprevir unbound to protein was <0.0001 (all subjects). Most adverse events were grade I or II; one subject with renal impairment who was receiving fenofibrate presented with grade 3 rhabdomyolysis. CONCLUSIONS: Simeprevir plasma concentrations were mildly elevated in subjects with severe renal impairment. The results suggest that simeprevir may be administered without dose adjustment in patients with renal impairment.