Cargando…
Understanding how environmental enhancement and conservation activities may benefit health and wellbeing: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: Action taken to enhance or conserve outdoor environments may benefit health and wellbeing through the process of participation but also through improving the environment. There is interest, amongst both health and environmental organisations, in using such activities as health promotion...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4561424/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26346542 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2214-3 |
_version_ | 1782389033898344448 |
---|---|
author | Lovell, Rebecca Husk, Kerryn Cooper, Chris Stahl-Timmins, Will Garside, Ruth |
author_facet | Lovell, Rebecca Husk, Kerryn Cooper, Chris Stahl-Timmins, Will Garside, Ruth |
author_sort | Lovell, Rebecca |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Action taken to enhance or conserve outdoor environments may benefit health and wellbeing through the process of participation but also through improving the environment. There is interest, amongst both health and environmental organisations, in using such activities as health promotion interventions. The objective of this systematic review was to investigate the health and wellbeing impacts of participation in environmental enhancement and conservation activities and to understand how these activities may be beneficial, to whom and in what circumstances or contexts. METHODS: A theory-led mixed-method systematic review was used to assess evidence of effect and to identify pathways to change (protocol: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD010351/full). Due to the multi-disciplinary, dispersed and disparate body of evidence an extensive multi-stage search strategy was devised and undertaken. Twenty-seven databases and multiple sources of grey literature were searched and over 200 relevant organisations were contacted. The heterogenous evidence was synthesised using a narrative approach and a conceptual model was developed to illustrate the mechanisms of effect. Due to the limited nature of the evidence additional higher order evidence was sought to assess the plausibility of the proposed mechanisms of effect through which health and wellbeing may accrue. RESULTS: The majority of the quantitative evidence (13 studies; all poor quality and lower-order study designs) was inconclusive, though a small number of positive and negative associations were observed. The qualitative evidence (13 studies; 10 poor quality, 3 good) indicated that the activities were perceived to have value to health and wellbeing through a number of key mechanisms; including exposure to natural environments, achievement, enjoyment and social contact. Additional high level evidence indicated that these pathways were plausible. CONCLUSIONS: Despite interest in the use of environmental enhancement activities as a health intervention there is currently little direct evidence of effect, this is primarily due to a lack of robust study designs. Further rigorous research is needed to understand the potential of the activities to benefit health and environment. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-015-2214-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4561424 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45614242015-09-08 Understanding how environmental enhancement and conservation activities may benefit health and wellbeing: a systematic review Lovell, Rebecca Husk, Kerryn Cooper, Chris Stahl-Timmins, Will Garside, Ruth BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Action taken to enhance or conserve outdoor environments may benefit health and wellbeing through the process of participation but also through improving the environment. There is interest, amongst both health and environmental organisations, in using such activities as health promotion interventions. The objective of this systematic review was to investigate the health and wellbeing impacts of participation in environmental enhancement and conservation activities and to understand how these activities may be beneficial, to whom and in what circumstances or contexts. METHODS: A theory-led mixed-method systematic review was used to assess evidence of effect and to identify pathways to change (protocol: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD010351/full). Due to the multi-disciplinary, dispersed and disparate body of evidence an extensive multi-stage search strategy was devised and undertaken. Twenty-seven databases and multiple sources of grey literature were searched and over 200 relevant organisations were contacted. The heterogenous evidence was synthesised using a narrative approach and a conceptual model was developed to illustrate the mechanisms of effect. Due to the limited nature of the evidence additional higher order evidence was sought to assess the plausibility of the proposed mechanisms of effect through which health and wellbeing may accrue. RESULTS: The majority of the quantitative evidence (13 studies; all poor quality and lower-order study designs) was inconclusive, though a small number of positive and negative associations were observed. The qualitative evidence (13 studies; 10 poor quality, 3 good) indicated that the activities were perceived to have value to health and wellbeing through a number of key mechanisms; including exposure to natural environments, achievement, enjoyment and social contact. Additional high level evidence indicated that these pathways were plausible. CONCLUSIONS: Despite interest in the use of environmental enhancement activities as a health intervention there is currently little direct evidence of effect, this is primarily due to a lack of robust study designs. Further rigorous research is needed to understand the potential of the activities to benefit health and environment. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-015-2214-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4561424/ /pubmed/26346542 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2214-3 Text en © Lovell et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lovell, Rebecca Husk, Kerryn Cooper, Chris Stahl-Timmins, Will Garside, Ruth Understanding how environmental enhancement and conservation activities may benefit health and wellbeing: a systematic review |
title | Understanding how environmental enhancement and conservation activities may benefit health and wellbeing: a systematic review |
title_full | Understanding how environmental enhancement and conservation activities may benefit health and wellbeing: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Understanding how environmental enhancement and conservation activities may benefit health and wellbeing: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Understanding how environmental enhancement and conservation activities may benefit health and wellbeing: a systematic review |
title_short | Understanding how environmental enhancement and conservation activities may benefit health and wellbeing: a systematic review |
title_sort | understanding how environmental enhancement and conservation activities may benefit health and wellbeing: a systematic review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4561424/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26346542 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2214-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lovellrebecca understandinghowenvironmentalenhancementandconservationactivitiesmaybenefithealthandwellbeingasystematicreview AT huskkerryn understandinghowenvironmentalenhancementandconservationactivitiesmaybenefithealthandwellbeingasystematicreview AT cooperchris understandinghowenvironmentalenhancementandconservationactivitiesmaybenefithealthandwellbeingasystematicreview AT stahltimminswill understandinghowenvironmentalenhancementandconservationactivitiesmaybenefithealthandwellbeingasystematicreview AT garsideruth understandinghowenvironmentalenhancementandconservationactivitiesmaybenefithealthandwellbeingasystematicreview |