Cargando…

Understanding how environmental enhancement and conservation activities may benefit health and wellbeing: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Action taken to enhance or conserve outdoor environments may benefit health and wellbeing through the process of participation but also through improving the environment. There is interest, amongst both health and environmental organisations, in using such activities as health promotion...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lovell, Rebecca, Husk, Kerryn, Cooper, Chris, Stahl-Timmins, Will, Garside, Ruth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4561424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26346542
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2214-3
_version_ 1782389033898344448
author Lovell, Rebecca
Husk, Kerryn
Cooper, Chris
Stahl-Timmins, Will
Garside, Ruth
author_facet Lovell, Rebecca
Husk, Kerryn
Cooper, Chris
Stahl-Timmins, Will
Garside, Ruth
author_sort Lovell, Rebecca
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Action taken to enhance or conserve outdoor environments may benefit health and wellbeing through the process of participation but also through improving the environment. There is interest, amongst both health and environmental organisations, in using such activities as health promotion interventions. The objective of this systematic review was to investigate the health and wellbeing impacts of participation in environmental enhancement and conservation activities and to understand how these activities may be beneficial, to whom and in what circumstances or contexts. METHODS: A theory-led mixed-method systematic review was used to assess evidence of effect and to identify pathways to change (protocol: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD010351/full). Due to the multi-disciplinary, dispersed and disparate body of evidence an extensive multi-stage search strategy was devised and undertaken. Twenty-seven databases and multiple sources of grey literature were searched and over 200 relevant organisations were contacted. The heterogenous evidence was synthesised using a narrative approach and a conceptual model was developed to illustrate the mechanisms of effect. Due to the limited nature of the evidence additional higher order evidence was sought to assess the plausibility of the proposed mechanisms of effect through which health and wellbeing may accrue. RESULTS: The majority of the quantitative evidence (13 studies; all poor quality and lower-order study designs) was inconclusive, though a small number of positive and negative associations were observed. The qualitative evidence (13 studies; 10 poor quality, 3 good) indicated that the activities were perceived to have value to health and wellbeing through a number of key mechanisms; including exposure to natural environments, achievement, enjoyment and social contact. Additional high level evidence indicated that these pathways were plausible. CONCLUSIONS: Despite interest in the use of environmental enhancement activities as a health intervention there is currently little direct evidence of effect, this is primarily due to a lack of robust study designs. Further rigorous research is needed to understand the potential of the activities to benefit health and environment. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-015-2214-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4561424
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45614242015-09-08 Understanding how environmental enhancement and conservation activities may benefit health and wellbeing: a systematic review Lovell, Rebecca Husk, Kerryn Cooper, Chris Stahl-Timmins, Will Garside, Ruth BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Action taken to enhance or conserve outdoor environments may benefit health and wellbeing through the process of participation but also through improving the environment. There is interest, amongst both health and environmental organisations, in using such activities as health promotion interventions. The objective of this systematic review was to investigate the health and wellbeing impacts of participation in environmental enhancement and conservation activities and to understand how these activities may be beneficial, to whom and in what circumstances or contexts. METHODS: A theory-led mixed-method systematic review was used to assess evidence of effect and to identify pathways to change (protocol: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD010351/full). Due to the multi-disciplinary, dispersed and disparate body of evidence an extensive multi-stage search strategy was devised and undertaken. Twenty-seven databases and multiple sources of grey literature were searched and over 200 relevant organisations were contacted. The heterogenous evidence was synthesised using a narrative approach and a conceptual model was developed to illustrate the mechanisms of effect. Due to the limited nature of the evidence additional higher order evidence was sought to assess the plausibility of the proposed mechanisms of effect through which health and wellbeing may accrue. RESULTS: The majority of the quantitative evidence (13 studies; all poor quality and lower-order study designs) was inconclusive, though a small number of positive and negative associations were observed. The qualitative evidence (13 studies; 10 poor quality, 3 good) indicated that the activities were perceived to have value to health and wellbeing through a number of key mechanisms; including exposure to natural environments, achievement, enjoyment and social contact. Additional high level evidence indicated that these pathways were plausible. CONCLUSIONS: Despite interest in the use of environmental enhancement activities as a health intervention there is currently little direct evidence of effect, this is primarily due to a lack of robust study designs. Further rigorous research is needed to understand the potential of the activities to benefit health and environment. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-015-2214-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4561424/ /pubmed/26346542 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2214-3 Text en © Lovell et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lovell, Rebecca
Husk, Kerryn
Cooper, Chris
Stahl-Timmins, Will
Garside, Ruth
Understanding how environmental enhancement and conservation activities may benefit health and wellbeing: a systematic review
title Understanding how environmental enhancement and conservation activities may benefit health and wellbeing: a systematic review
title_full Understanding how environmental enhancement and conservation activities may benefit health and wellbeing: a systematic review
title_fullStr Understanding how environmental enhancement and conservation activities may benefit health and wellbeing: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Understanding how environmental enhancement and conservation activities may benefit health and wellbeing: a systematic review
title_short Understanding how environmental enhancement and conservation activities may benefit health and wellbeing: a systematic review
title_sort understanding how environmental enhancement and conservation activities may benefit health and wellbeing: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4561424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26346542
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2214-3
work_keys_str_mv AT lovellrebecca understandinghowenvironmentalenhancementandconservationactivitiesmaybenefithealthandwellbeingasystematicreview
AT huskkerryn understandinghowenvironmentalenhancementandconservationactivitiesmaybenefithealthandwellbeingasystematicreview
AT cooperchris understandinghowenvironmentalenhancementandconservationactivitiesmaybenefithealthandwellbeingasystematicreview
AT stahltimminswill understandinghowenvironmentalenhancementandconservationactivitiesmaybenefithealthandwellbeingasystematicreview
AT garsideruth understandinghowenvironmentalenhancementandconservationactivitiesmaybenefithealthandwellbeingasystematicreview