Cargando…

Variation among cardiovascular risk calculators in relative risk increases with identical risk factor increases

BACKGROUND: Risk estimates for the same patient can vary substantially among cardiovascular risk calculators and the reasons are not fully explained. We compared the relative risk increases for consistent risk factors changes across different cardiovascular risk calculators. METHODS: Five clinicians...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Allan, G. Michael, Nouri, Faeze, Korownyk, Christina, Kolber, Michael R., Vandermeer, Ben, McCormack, James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4561470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26346935
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1401-8
_version_ 1782389041253056512
author Allan, G. Michael
Nouri, Faeze
Korownyk, Christina
Kolber, Michael R.
Vandermeer, Ben
McCormack, James
author_facet Allan, G. Michael
Nouri, Faeze
Korownyk, Christina
Kolber, Michael R.
Vandermeer, Ben
McCormack, James
author_sort Allan, G. Michael
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Risk estimates for the same patient can vary substantially among cardiovascular risk calculators and the reasons are not fully explained. We compared the relative risk increases for consistent risk factors changes across different cardiovascular risk calculators. METHODS: Five clinicians independently selected 16 calculators providing absolute risk estimations. Hypothetical patients were generated using a combination of seven risk factors [age, gender, smoking, blood pressure, high-density lipoprotein (HDL), total cholesterol and diabetes] dichotomized to high and low risk, generating 2(7) patients (128 total). Relative risk increases due to specific risk factors were determined and compared. RESULTS: The 16 selected calculators were from six countries, used 5- and 10-year predictions, and estimated CVD or coronary heart disease risk. Across the different calculators for non-diabetic patients, changing age from 50 to 70 produced average relative risk increases from 82 to 395 %, gender (female to male) 35–225 %, smoking status 31–118 %, systolic blood pressure (120–160 mmHg) 16–124 %, total cholesterol (4–7 mmol/L) 51–302 % and HDL (1.3–0.8 mmol/L) 27–133 %. Similar results were found among diabetic patients. Some calculators appeared to have consistently higher relative risk increases over multiple risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiovascular risk calculators weigh the same risk factors differently. For each risk factor, the relative risk increase from the calculator with the highest increase was generally three to eight times greater than the relative risk increase from the calculator with lowest increase. This likely contributes to some of the inconsistency in risk calculator estimation. It also limits the use of risk calculators in estimating the benefits of therapy. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13104-015-1401-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4561470
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45614702015-09-08 Variation among cardiovascular risk calculators in relative risk increases with identical risk factor increases Allan, G. Michael Nouri, Faeze Korownyk, Christina Kolber, Michael R. Vandermeer, Ben McCormack, James BMC Res Notes Research Article BACKGROUND: Risk estimates for the same patient can vary substantially among cardiovascular risk calculators and the reasons are not fully explained. We compared the relative risk increases for consistent risk factors changes across different cardiovascular risk calculators. METHODS: Five clinicians independently selected 16 calculators providing absolute risk estimations. Hypothetical patients were generated using a combination of seven risk factors [age, gender, smoking, blood pressure, high-density lipoprotein (HDL), total cholesterol and diabetes] dichotomized to high and low risk, generating 2(7) patients (128 total). Relative risk increases due to specific risk factors were determined and compared. RESULTS: The 16 selected calculators were from six countries, used 5- and 10-year predictions, and estimated CVD or coronary heart disease risk. Across the different calculators for non-diabetic patients, changing age from 50 to 70 produced average relative risk increases from 82 to 395 %, gender (female to male) 35–225 %, smoking status 31–118 %, systolic blood pressure (120–160 mmHg) 16–124 %, total cholesterol (4–7 mmol/L) 51–302 % and HDL (1.3–0.8 mmol/L) 27–133 %. Similar results were found among diabetic patients. Some calculators appeared to have consistently higher relative risk increases over multiple risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiovascular risk calculators weigh the same risk factors differently. For each risk factor, the relative risk increase from the calculator with the highest increase was generally three to eight times greater than the relative risk increase from the calculator with lowest increase. This likely contributes to some of the inconsistency in risk calculator estimation. It also limits the use of risk calculators in estimating the benefits of therapy. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13104-015-1401-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4561470/ /pubmed/26346935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1401-8 Text en © Allan et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Allan, G. Michael
Nouri, Faeze
Korownyk, Christina
Kolber, Michael R.
Vandermeer, Ben
McCormack, James
Variation among cardiovascular risk calculators in relative risk increases with identical risk factor increases
title Variation among cardiovascular risk calculators in relative risk increases with identical risk factor increases
title_full Variation among cardiovascular risk calculators in relative risk increases with identical risk factor increases
title_fullStr Variation among cardiovascular risk calculators in relative risk increases with identical risk factor increases
title_full_unstemmed Variation among cardiovascular risk calculators in relative risk increases with identical risk factor increases
title_short Variation among cardiovascular risk calculators in relative risk increases with identical risk factor increases
title_sort variation among cardiovascular risk calculators in relative risk increases with identical risk factor increases
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4561470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26346935
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1401-8
work_keys_str_mv AT allangmichael variationamongcardiovascularriskcalculatorsinrelativeriskincreaseswithidenticalriskfactorincreases
AT nourifaeze variationamongcardiovascularriskcalculatorsinrelativeriskincreaseswithidenticalriskfactorincreases
AT korownykchristina variationamongcardiovascularriskcalculatorsinrelativeriskincreaseswithidenticalriskfactorincreases
AT kolbermichaelr variationamongcardiovascularriskcalculatorsinrelativeriskincreaseswithidenticalriskfactorincreases
AT vandermeerben variationamongcardiovascularriskcalculatorsinrelativeriskincreaseswithidenticalriskfactorincreases
AT mccormackjames variationamongcardiovascularriskcalculatorsinrelativeriskincreaseswithidenticalriskfactorincreases