Cargando…

The effect of spinal manipulation on deep experimental muscle pain in healthy volunteers

BACKGROUND: High-velocity low-amplitude (HVLA) spinal manipulation is commonly used in the treatment of spinal pain syndromes. The mechanisms by which HVLA-manipulation might reduce spinal pain are not well understood, but often assumed to relate to the reduction of biomechanical dysfunction. It is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O’Neill, Søren, Ødegaard-Olsen, Øystein, Søvde, Beate
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4561471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26347808
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-015-0069-4
_version_ 1782389041481646080
author O’Neill, Søren
Ødegaard-Olsen, Øystein
Søvde, Beate
author_facet O’Neill, Søren
Ødegaard-Olsen, Øystein
Søvde, Beate
author_sort O’Neill, Søren
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: High-velocity low-amplitude (HVLA) spinal manipulation is commonly used in the treatment of spinal pain syndromes. The mechanisms by which HVLA-manipulation might reduce spinal pain are not well understood, but often assumed to relate to the reduction of biomechanical dysfunction. It is also possible however, that HVLA-manipulation involves a segmental or generalized inhibitory effect on nociception, irrespective of biomechanical function. In the current study it was investigated whether a local analgesic effect of HVLA-manipulation on deep muscle pain could be detected, in healthy individuals. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Local, para-spinal muscle pain was induced by injection of 0.5 ml sterile, hyper-tonic saline on two separate occasions 1 week apart. Immediately following the injection, treatment was administered as either a) HVLA-manipulation or b) placebo treatment, in a randomized cross-over design. Both interventions were conducted by an experienced chiropractor with minimum 6 years of clinical experience. Participants and the researcher collecting data were blinded to the treatment allocation. Pain scores following saline injection were measured by computerized visual analogue pain scale (VAS) (0-100 VAS, 1 Hz) and summarized as a) Pain duration, b) Maximum VAS, c) Time to maximum VAS and d) Summarized VAS (area under the curve). Data analysis was performed as two-way analysis of variance with treatment allocation and session number as explanatory variables. RESULTS: Twenty-nine healthy adults (mean age 24.5 years) participated, 13 women and 16 men. Complete data was available for 28 participants. Analysis of variance revealed no statistically significant difference between active and placebo manipulation on any of the four pain measures. CONCLUSION: The current findings do not support the theory that HVLA-manipulation has a non-specific, reflex-mediated local or generalized analgesic effect on experimentally induced deep muscle pain. This in turn suggests, that any clinical analgesic effect of HVLA-manipulation is likely related to the amelioration of a pre-existing painful problem, such as reduction of biomechanical dysfunction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4561471
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45614712015-09-08 The effect of spinal manipulation on deep experimental muscle pain in healthy volunteers O’Neill, Søren Ødegaard-Olsen, Øystein Søvde, Beate Chiropr Man Therap Research BACKGROUND: High-velocity low-amplitude (HVLA) spinal manipulation is commonly used in the treatment of spinal pain syndromes. The mechanisms by which HVLA-manipulation might reduce spinal pain are not well understood, but often assumed to relate to the reduction of biomechanical dysfunction. It is also possible however, that HVLA-manipulation involves a segmental or generalized inhibitory effect on nociception, irrespective of biomechanical function. In the current study it was investigated whether a local analgesic effect of HVLA-manipulation on deep muscle pain could be detected, in healthy individuals. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Local, para-spinal muscle pain was induced by injection of 0.5 ml sterile, hyper-tonic saline on two separate occasions 1 week apart. Immediately following the injection, treatment was administered as either a) HVLA-manipulation or b) placebo treatment, in a randomized cross-over design. Both interventions were conducted by an experienced chiropractor with minimum 6 years of clinical experience. Participants and the researcher collecting data were blinded to the treatment allocation. Pain scores following saline injection were measured by computerized visual analogue pain scale (VAS) (0-100 VAS, 1 Hz) and summarized as a) Pain duration, b) Maximum VAS, c) Time to maximum VAS and d) Summarized VAS (area under the curve). Data analysis was performed as two-way analysis of variance with treatment allocation and session number as explanatory variables. RESULTS: Twenty-nine healthy adults (mean age 24.5 years) participated, 13 women and 16 men. Complete data was available for 28 participants. Analysis of variance revealed no statistically significant difference between active and placebo manipulation on any of the four pain measures. CONCLUSION: The current findings do not support the theory that HVLA-manipulation has a non-specific, reflex-mediated local or generalized analgesic effect on experimentally induced deep muscle pain. This in turn suggests, that any clinical analgesic effect of HVLA-manipulation is likely related to the amelioration of a pre-existing painful problem, such as reduction of biomechanical dysfunction. BioMed Central 2015-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4561471/ /pubmed/26347808 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-015-0069-4 Text en © O’Neill et al. 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
O’Neill, Søren
Ødegaard-Olsen, Øystein
Søvde, Beate
The effect of spinal manipulation on deep experimental muscle pain in healthy volunteers
title The effect of spinal manipulation on deep experimental muscle pain in healthy volunteers
title_full The effect of spinal manipulation on deep experimental muscle pain in healthy volunteers
title_fullStr The effect of spinal manipulation on deep experimental muscle pain in healthy volunteers
title_full_unstemmed The effect of spinal manipulation on deep experimental muscle pain in healthy volunteers
title_short The effect of spinal manipulation on deep experimental muscle pain in healthy volunteers
title_sort effect of spinal manipulation on deep experimental muscle pain in healthy volunteers
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4561471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26347808
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-015-0069-4
work_keys_str_mv AT oneillsøren theeffectofspinalmanipulationondeepexperimentalmusclepaininhealthyvolunteers
AT ødegaardolsenøystein theeffectofspinalmanipulationondeepexperimentalmusclepaininhealthyvolunteers
AT søvdebeate theeffectofspinalmanipulationondeepexperimentalmusclepaininhealthyvolunteers
AT oneillsøren effectofspinalmanipulationondeepexperimentalmusclepaininhealthyvolunteers
AT ødegaardolsenøystein effectofspinalmanipulationondeepexperimentalmusclepaininhealthyvolunteers
AT søvdebeate effectofspinalmanipulationondeepexperimentalmusclepaininhealthyvolunteers