Cargando…

Male rhesus macaques use vocalizations to distinguish female maternal, but not paternal, kin from non-kin

Recognizing close kin and adjusting one’s behavior accordingly (i.e., favor kin in social interactions, but avoid mating with them) would be an important skill that can increase an animals’ inclusive fitness. Previous studies showed that philopatric female rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) bias their...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pfefferle, Dana, Ruiz-Lambides, Angelina V., Widdig, Anja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4562008/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26379365
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00265-015-1979-9
_version_ 1782389103670591488
author Pfefferle, Dana
Ruiz-Lambides, Angelina V.
Widdig, Anja
author_facet Pfefferle, Dana
Ruiz-Lambides, Angelina V.
Widdig, Anja
author_sort Pfefferle, Dana
collection PubMed
description Recognizing close kin and adjusting one’s behavior accordingly (i.e., favor kin in social interactions, but avoid mating with them) would be an important skill that can increase an animals’ inclusive fitness. Previous studies showed that philopatric female rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) bias their social behavior toward maternal and paternal kin. Benefits gained from selecting kin should, however, not only apply to the philopatric sex, for which the enduring spatial proximity facilitates kin discrimination. Given that dispersal is costly, the dispersing sex may benefit from migrating together with their kin or into groups containing kin. In male rhesus macaques, natal migrants bias their spatial proximity toward familiar male kin rather than familiar non-kin. Here, we set up playback experiments to test if males use the acoustic modality to discriminate familiar female kin from non-kin in a non-sexual context. Males responded differently to the presentation of “coo” calls of related and unrelated females, with their reaction depending on the interaction between kin-line (maternal vs paternal kin) and degree of relatedness (r = 0.5, 0.25). Specifically, males were more likely to respond to close kin compared to more distant kin or unrelated females, with this effect being significant in the maternal, but not paternal kin-line. The present study adds to our knowledge of kin recognition abilities of the dispersing sex, suggesting that male rhesus macaques are also able to identify kin using the acoustic modality. We discuss that the probability of response might be affected by the potential benefit of the social partner.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4562008
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45620082015-09-14 Male rhesus macaques use vocalizations to distinguish female maternal, but not paternal, kin from non-kin Pfefferle, Dana Ruiz-Lambides, Angelina V. Widdig, Anja Behav Ecol Sociobiol Original Article Recognizing close kin and adjusting one’s behavior accordingly (i.e., favor kin in social interactions, but avoid mating with them) would be an important skill that can increase an animals’ inclusive fitness. Previous studies showed that philopatric female rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) bias their social behavior toward maternal and paternal kin. Benefits gained from selecting kin should, however, not only apply to the philopatric sex, for which the enduring spatial proximity facilitates kin discrimination. Given that dispersal is costly, the dispersing sex may benefit from migrating together with their kin or into groups containing kin. In male rhesus macaques, natal migrants bias their spatial proximity toward familiar male kin rather than familiar non-kin. Here, we set up playback experiments to test if males use the acoustic modality to discriminate familiar female kin from non-kin in a non-sexual context. Males responded differently to the presentation of “coo” calls of related and unrelated females, with their reaction depending on the interaction between kin-line (maternal vs paternal kin) and degree of relatedness (r = 0.5, 0.25). Specifically, males were more likely to respond to close kin compared to more distant kin or unrelated females, with this effect being significant in the maternal, but not paternal kin-line. The present study adds to our knowledge of kin recognition abilities of the dispersing sex, suggesting that male rhesus macaques are also able to identify kin using the acoustic modality. We discuss that the probability of response might be affected by the potential benefit of the social partner. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-07-28 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4562008/ /pubmed/26379365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00265-015-1979-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Pfefferle, Dana
Ruiz-Lambides, Angelina V.
Widdig, Anja
Male rhesus macaques use vocalizations to distinguish female maternal, but not paternal, kin from non-kin
title Male rhesus macaques use vocalizations to distinguish female maternal, but not paternal, kin from non-kin
title_full Male rhesus macaques use vocalizations to distinguish female maternal, but not paternal, kin from non-kin
title_fullStr Male rhesus macaques use vocalizations to distinguish female maternal, but not paternal, kin from non-kin
title_full_unstemmed Male rhesus macaques use vocalizations to distinguish female maternal, but not paternal, kin from non-kin
title_short Male rhesus macaques use vocalizations to distinguish female maternal, but not paternal, kin from non-kin
title_sort male rhesus macaques use vocalizations to distinguish female maternal, but not paternal, kin from non-kin
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4562008/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26379365
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00265-015-1979-9
work_keys_str_mv AT pfefferledana malerhesusmacaquesusevocalizationstodistinguishfemalematernalbutnotpaternalkinfromnonkin
AT ruizlambidesangelinav malerhesusmacaquesusevocalizationstodistinguishfemalematernalbutnotpaternalkinfromnonkin
AT widdiganja malerhesusmacaquesusevocalizationstodistinguishfemalematernalbutnotpaternalkinfromnonkin