Cargando…

The effectiveness of tobacco control television advertisements in increasing the prevalence of smoke-free homes

BACKGROUND: There is considerable evidence that tobacco control mass media campaigns can change smoking behaviour. In the UK, campaigns over the last decade have contributed to declines in smoking prevalence and been associated with falls in cigarette consumption among continuing smokers. However, i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lewis, S., Sims, M., Richardson, S., Langley, T., Szatkowski, L., McNeill, A., Gilmore, A. B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4562106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26350614
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2207-2
_version_ 1782389114108116992
author Lewis, S.
Sims, M.
Richardson, S.
Langley, T.
Szatkowski, L.
McNeill, A.
Gilmore, A. B.
author_facet Lewis, S.
Sims, M.
Richardson, S.
Langley, T.
Szatkowski, L.
McNeill, A.
Gilmore, A. B.
author_sort Lewis, S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is considerable evidence that tobacco control mass media campaigns can change smoking behaviour. In the UK, campaigns over the last decade have contributed to declines in smoking prevalence and been associated with falls in cigarette consumption among continuing smokers. However, it is less evident whether such campaigns can also play a role in changing smokers’ behaviour in relation to protecting others from the harmful effects of their smoking in the home. We investigated whether exposure to English televised tobacco control campaigns, and specifically campaigns targeting second hand smoking, is associated with smokers having a smoke-free home. METHODS: We used repeated cross-sectional national survey data on 9872 households which participated in the Health Survey for England between 2004 and 2010, with at least one adult current smoker living in the household. Exposure to all government-funded televised tobacco control campaigns, and to those specifically with a second hand smoking theme, was quantified in Gross Rating Points (GRPs), an average per capita measure of advert exposure where 100 GRPs indicates 100 % of adults exposed once or 50 % twice. Our outcome was self-reported presence of a smoke-free home (where no one smokes in the home on most days). Analysis used generalised additive models, controlling for individual factors and temporal trends. RESULTS: There was no association between monthly televised campaigns overall and the probability of having a smoke-free home. However, exposure to campaigns specifically targeting second hand smoke was associated with increased odds of a smoke-free home in the following month (odds ratio per additional 100 GRPs, 1.07, 95 % CI 1.01 to 1.13), though this association was not seen at other lags. These effects were not modified by socio-economic status or by presence of a child in the home. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide tentative evidence that mass media campaigns specifically focussing on second hand smoke may be effective in reducing smoking in the home, and further evaluation of campaigns of this type is needed. General tobacco control campaigns in England, which largely focus on promoting smoking cessation, do not impact on smoke-free homes over and above their direct effect at reducing smoking.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4562106
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45621062015-09-09 The effectiveness of tobacco control television advertisements in increasing the prevalence of smoke-free homes Lewis, S. Sims, M. Richardson, S. Langley, T. Szatkowski, L. McNeill, A. Gilmore, A. B. BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: There is considerable evidence that tobacco control mass media campaigns can change smoking behaviour. In the UK, campaigns over the last decade have contributed to declines in smoking prevalence and been associated with falls in cigarette consumption among continuing smokers. However, it is less evident whether such campaigns can also play a role in changing smokers’ behaviour in relation to protecting others from the harmful effects of their smoking in the home. We investigated whether exposure to English televised tobacco control campaigns, and specifically campaigns targeting second hand smoking, is associated with smokers having a smoke-free home. METHODS: We used repeated cross-sectional national survey data on 9872 households which participated in the Health Survey for England between 2004 and 2010, with at least one adult current smoker living in the household. Exposure to all government-funded televised tobacco control campaigns, and to those specifically with a second hand smoking theme, was quantified in Gross Rating Points (GRPs), an average per capita measure of advert exposure where 100 GRPs indicates 100 % of adults exposed once or 50 % twice. Our outcome was self-reported presence of a smoke-free home (where no one smokes in the home on most days). Analysis used generalised additive models, controlling for individual factors and temporal trends. RESULTS: There was no association between monthly televised campaigns overall and the probability of having a smoke-free home. However, exposure to campaigns specifically targeting second hand smoke was associated with increased odds of a smoke-free home in the following month (odds ratio per additional 100 GRPs, 1.07, 95 % CI 1.01 to 1.13), though this association was not seen at other lags. These effects were not modified by socio-economic status or by presence of a child in the home. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide tentative evidence that mass media campaigns specifically focussing on second hand smoke may be effective in reducing smoking in the home, and further evaluation of campaigns of this type is needed. General tobacco control campaigns in England, which largely focus on promoting smoking cessation, do not impact on smoke-free homes over and above their direct effect at reducing smoking. BioMed Central 2015-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4562106/ /pubmed/26350614 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2207-2 Text en © Lewis et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lewis, S.
Sims, M.
Richardson, S.
Langley, T.
Szatkowski, L.
McNeill, A.
Gilmore, A. B.
The effectiveness of tobacco control television advertisements in increasing the prevalence of smoke-free homes
title The effectiveness of tobacco control television advertisements in increasing the prevalence of smoke-free homes
title_full The effectiveness of tobacco control television advertisements in increasing the prevalence of smoke-free homes
title_fullStr The effectiveness of tobacco control television advertisements in increasing the prevalence of smoke-free homes
title_full_unstemmed The effectiveness of tobacco control television advertisements in increasing the prevalence of smoke-free homes
title_short The effectiveness of tobacco control television advertisements in increasing the prevalence of smoke-free homes
title_sort effectiveness of tobacco control television advertisements in increasing the prevalence of smoke-free homes
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4562106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26350614
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2207-2
work_keys_str_mv AT lewiss theeffectivenessoftobaccocontroltelevisionadvertisementsinincreasingtheprevalenceofsmokefreehomes
AT simsm theeffectivenessoftobaccocontroltelevisionadvertisementsinincreasingtheprevalenceofsmokefreehomes
AT richardsons theeffectivenessoftobaccocontroltelevisionadvertisementsinincreasingtheprevalenceofsmokefreehomes
AT langleyt theeffectivenessoftobaccocontroltelevisionadvertisementsinincreasingtheprevalenceofsmokefreehomes
AT szatkowskil theeffectivenessoftobaccocontroltelevisionadvertisementsinincreasingtheprevalenceofsmokefreehomes
AT mcneilla theeffectivenessoftobaccocontroltelevisionadvertisementsinincreasingtheprevalenceofsmokefreehomes
AT gilmoreab theeffectivenessoftobaccocontroltelevisionadvertisementsinincreasingtheprevalenceofsmokefreehomes
AT lewiss effectivenessoftobaccocontroltelevisionadvertisementsinincreasingtheprevalenceofsmokefreehomes
AT simsm effectivenessoftobaccocontroltelevisionadvertisementsinincreasingtheprevalenceofsmokefreehomes
AT richardsons effectivenessoftobaccocontroltelevisionadvertisementsinincreasingtheprevalenceofsmokefreehomes
AT langleyt effectivenessoftobaccocontroltelevisionadvertisementsinincreasingtheprevalenceofsmokefreehomes
AT szatkowskil effectivenessoftobaccocontroltelevisionadvertisementsinincreasingtheprevalenceofsmokefreehomes
AT mcneilla effectivenessoftobaccocontroltelevisionadvertisementsinincreasingtheprevalenceofsmokefreehomes
AT gilmoreab effectivenessoftobaccocontroltelevisionadvertisementsinincreasingtheprevalenceofsmokefreehomes