Cargando…

Vasopressin receptors V1(a) and V2 are not osmosensors

Herein, we investigated whether G protein-coupled signaling via the vasopressin receptors of the V1(a) and V2 subtypes (V1(a)R and V2R) could be obtained as a direct response to hyperosmolar challenges and/or whether hyperosmolar challenges could augment classical vasopressin-dependent V1(a)R signal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lykke, Kasper, Assentoft, Mette, Fenton, Robert A, Rosenkilde, Mette M, MacAulay, Nanna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4562598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26311834
http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.12519
_version_ 1782389178618609664
author Lykke, Kasper
Assentoft, Mette
Fenton, Robert A
Rosenkilde, Mette M
MacAulay, Nanna
author_facet Lykke, Kasper
Assentoft, Mette
Fenton, Robert A
Rosenkilde, Mette M
MacAulay, Nanna
author_sort Lykke, Kasper
collection PubMed
description Herein, we investigated whether G protein-coupled signaling via the vasopressin receptors of the V1(a) and V2 subtypes (V1(a)R and V2R) could be obtained as a direct response to hyperosmolar challenges and/or whether hyperosmolar challenges could augment classical vasopressin-dependent V1(a)R signaling. The V1(a)R-dependent response was monitored indirectly via its effects on aquaporin 4 (AQP4) when heterologously expressed in Xenopus oocytes and V1(a)R and V2R function was directly monitored following heterologous expression in COS-7 cells. A tendency toward an osmotically induced, V1(a)R-mediated reduction in AQP4-dependent water permeability was observed, although osmotic challenges failed to mimic vasopressin-dependent V1(a)R-mediated internalization of AQP4. Direct monitoring of inositol phosphate (IP) production of V1(a)R-expressing COS-7 cells demonstrated an efficient vasopressin-dependent response that was, however, independent of hyperosmotic challenges. Similarly, the cAMP production by the V2R was unaffected by hyperosmotic challenges although, in contrast to the V1(a)R, the V2R displayed an ability to support alternative signaling (IP production) at higher concentration of vasopressin. V1(a)R and V2R respond directly to vasopressin exposure, but they do not have an ability to act as osmo- or volume sensors when exposed to an osmotic gradient in the absence or presence of vasopressin.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4562598
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45625982015-09-14 Vasopressin receptors V1(a) and V2 are not osmosensors Lykke, Kasper Assentoft, Mette Fenton, Robert A Rosenkilde, Mette M MacAulay, Nanna Physiol Rep Original Research Herein, we investigated whether G protein-coupled signaling via the vasopressin receptors of the V1(a) and V2 subtypes (V1(a)R and V2R) could be obtained as a direct response to hyperosmolar challenges and/or whether hyperosmolar challenges could augment classical vasopressin-dependent V1(a)R signaling. The V1(a)R-dependent response was monitored indirectly via its effects on aquaporin 4 (AQP4) when heterologously expressed in Xenopus oocytes and V1(a)R and V2R function was directly monitored following heterologous expression in COS-7 cells. A tendency toward an osmotically induced, V1(a)R-mediated reduction in AQP4-dependent water permeability was observed, although osmotic challenges failed to mimic vasopressin-dependent V1(a)R-mediated internalization of AQP4. Direct monitoring of inositol phosphate (IP) production of V1(a)R-expressing COS-7 cells demonstrated an efficient vasopressin-dependent response that was, however, independent of hyperosmotic challenges. Similarly, the cAMP production by the V2R was unaffected by hyperosmotic challenges although, in contrast to the V1(a)R, the V2R displayed an ability to support alternative signaling (IP production) at higher concentration of vasopressin. V1(a)R and V2R respond directly to vasopressin exposure, but they do not have an ability to act as osmo- or volume sensors when exposed to an osmotic gradient in the absence or presence of vasopressin. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2015-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4562598/ /pubmed/26311834 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.12519 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American Physiological Society and The Physiological Society. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Lykke, Kasper
Assentoft, Mette
Fenton, Robert A
Rosenkilde, Mette M
MacAulay, Nanna
Vasopressin receptors V1(a) and V2 are not osmosensors
title Vasopressin receptors V1(a) and V2 are not osmosensors
title_full Vasopressin receptors V1(a) and V2 are not osmosensors
title_fullStr Vasopressin receptors V1(a) and V2 are not osmosensors
title_full_unstemmed Vasopressin receptors V1(a) and V2 are not osmosensors
title_short Vasopressin receptors V1(a) and V2 are not osmosensors
title_sort vasopressin receptors v1(a) and v2 are not osmosensors
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4562598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26311834
http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.12519
work_keys_str_mv AT lykkekasper vasopressinreceptorsv1aandv2arenotosmosensors
AT assentoftmette vasopressinreceptorsv1aandv2arenotosmosensors
AT fentonroberta vasopressinreceptorsv1aandv2arenotosmosensors
AT rosenkildemettem vasopressinreceptorsv1aandv2arenotosmosensors
AT macaulaynanna vasopressinreceptorsv1aandv2arenotosmosensors