Cargando…

Can Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography Be a Substitute for Bone Marrow Biopsy in Detection of Bone Marrow Involvement in Patients with Hodgkin’s or Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma?

OBJECTIVE: Positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET/CT) has become an important part of staging and treatment evaluation algorithms of lymphoma. We aimed to compare the results of PET/CT with bone marrow biopsy (BMB) with respect to bone marrow involvement (BMI) in patients with Hod...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Çetin, Güven, Çıkrıkçıoğlu, M. Ali, Özkan, Tuba, Karatoprak, Cumali, Ar, M. Cem, Eşkazan, Ahmet Emre, Ayer, Mesut, Cerit, Abdullah, Gözübenli, Kübra, Börkü Uysal, Betül, Erdem, Simge, Ergül, Nurhan, Tatar, Gamze, Çermik, T. Fikret
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Galenos Publishing 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4563196/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25912844
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjh.2013.0336
_version_ 1782389265192189952
author Çetin, Güven
Çıkrıkçıoğlu, M. Ali
Özkan, Tuba
Karatoprak, Cumali
Ar, M. Cem
Eşkazan, Ahmet Emre
Ayer, Mesut
Cerit, Abdullah
Gözübenli, Kübra
Börkü Uysal, Betül
Erdem, Simge
Ergül, Nurhan
Tatar, Gamze
Çermik, T. Fikret
author_facet Çetin, Güven
Çıkrıkçıoğlu, M. Ali
Özkan, Tuba
Karatoprak, Cumali
Ar, M. Cem
Eşkazan, Ahmet Emre
Ayer, Mesut
Cerit, Abdullah
Gözübenli, Kübra
Börkü Uysal, Betül
Erdem, Simge
Ergül, Nurhan
Tatar, Gamze
Çermik, T. Fikret
author_sort Çetin, Güven
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET/CT) has become an important part of staging and treatment evaluation algorithms of lymphoma. We aimed to compare the results of PET/CT with bone marrow biopsy (BMB) with respect to bone marrow involvement (BMI) in patients with Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL) and aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (aNHL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical files of a total of 297 patients diagnosed with HL or aNHL and followed at the hematology clinics of 3 major hospitals in İstanbul between 2008 and 2012 were screened retrospectively and 161 patients with classical HL and aNHL were included in the study. The patients were referred for PET/CT and BMB at the initial staging. BMB was performed as the reference standard for the evaluation of BMI. RESULTS: There were 61 (38%) HL and 100 (62%) aNHL patients. Concordant results were revealed between PET/CT and BMB in 126 patients (78%) (52 HL, 74 aNHL), 20 with positive PET/CT and BMB results and 106 with negative PET/CT and BMB results. There were discordant results in 35 patients (9 HL, 26 aNHL), 16 of them with positive BMB and negative PET/CT results and 19 of them with negative BMB and positive PET/CT results. CONCLUSION: We observed that PET/CT is effective to detect BMI, despite it alone not being sufficient to evaluate BMI in HL and aNHL. Bone marrow trephine biopsy and PET/CT should be considered as mutually complementary methods for detection of BMI in patients with lymphoma. In suspected focal involvement, combining biopsy and PET/CT might improve staging results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4563196
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Galenos Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45631962016-01-12 Can Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography Be a Substitute for Bone Marrow Biopsy in Detection of Bone Marrow Involvement in Patients with Hodgkin’s or Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma? Çetin, Güven Çıkrıkçıoğlu, M. Ali Özkan, Tuba Karatoprak, Cumali Ar, M. Cem Eşkazan, Ahmet Emre Ayer, Mesut Cerit, Abdullah Gözübenli, Kübra Börkü Uysal, Betül Erdem, Simge Ergül, Nurhan Tatar, Gamze Çermik, T. Fikret Turk J Haematol Research Article OBJECTIVE: Positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET/CT) has become an important part of staging and treatment evaluation algorithms of lymphoma. We aimed to compare the results of PET/CT with bone marrow biopsy (BMB) with respect to bone marrow involvement (BMI) in patients with Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL) and aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (aNHL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical files of a total of 297 patients diagnosed with HL or aNHL and followed at the hematology clinics of 3 major hospitals in İstanbul between 2008 and 2012 were screened retrospectively and 161 patients with classical HL and aNHL were included in the study. The patients were referred for PET/CT and BMB at the initial staging. BMB was performed as the reference standard for the evaluation of BMI. RESULTS: There were 61 (38%) HL and 100 (62%) aNHL patients. Concordant results were revealed between PET/CT and BMB in 126 patients (78%) (52 HL, 74 aNHL), 20 with positive PET/CT and BMB results and 106 with negative PET/CT and BMB results. There were discordant results in 35 patients (9 HL, 26 aNHL), 16 of them with positive BMB and negative PET/CT results and 19 of them with negative BMB and positive PET/CT results. CONCLUSION: We observed that PET/CT is effective to detect BMI, despite it alone not being sufficient to evaluate BMI in HL and aNHL. Bone marrow trephine biopsy and PET/CT should be considered as mutually complementary methods for detection of BMI in patients with lymphoma. In suspected focal involvement, combining biopsy and PET/CT might improve staging results. Galenos Publishing 2015-09 2015-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4563196/ /pubmed/25912844 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjh.2013.0336 Text en © Turkish Journal of Hematology, Published by Galenos Publishing. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Çetin, Güven
Çıkrıkçıoğlu, M. Ali
Özkan, Tuba
Karatoprak, Cumali
Ar, M. Cem
Eşkazan, Ahmet Emre
Ayer, Mesut
Cerit, Abdullah
Gözübenli, Kübra
Börkü Uysal, Betül
Erdem, Simge
Ergül, Nurhan
Tatar, Gamze
Çermik, T. Fikret
Can Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography Be a Substitute for Bone Marrow Biopsy in Detection of Bone Marrow Involvement in Patients with Hodgkin’s or Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma?
title Can Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography Be a Substitute for Bone Marrow Biopsy in Detection of Bone Marrow Involvement in Patients with Hodgkin’s or Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma?
title_full Can Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography Be a Substitute for Bone Marrow Biopsy in Detection of Bone Marrow Involvement in Patients with Hodgkin’s or Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma?
title_fullStr Can Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography Be a Substitute for Bone Marrow Biopsy in Detection of Bone Marrow Involvement in Patients with Hodgkin’s or Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma?
title_full_unstemmed Can Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography Be a Substitute for Bone Marrow Biopsy in Detection of Bone Marrow Involvement in Patients with Hodgkin’s or Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma?
title_short Can Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography Be a Substitute for Bone Marrow Biopsy in Detection of Bone Marrow Involvement in Patients with Hodgkin’s or Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma?
title_sort can positron emission tomography and computed tomography be a substitute for bone marrow biopsy in detection of bone marrow involvement in patients with hodgkin’s or non-hodgkin’s lymphoma?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4563196/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25912844
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjh.2013.0336
work_keys_str_mv AT cetinguven canpositronemissiontomographyandcomputedtomographybeasubstituteforbonemarrowbiopsyindetectionofbonemarrowinvolvementinpatientswithhodgkinsornonhodgkinslymphoma
AT cıkrıkcıoglumali canpositronemissiontomographyandcomputedtomographybeasubstituteforbonemarrowbiopsyindetectionofbonemarrowinvolvementinpatientswithhodgkinsornonhodgkinslymphoma
AT ozkantuba canpositronemissiontomographyandcomputedtomographybeasubstituteforbonemarrowbiopsyindetectionofbonemarrowinvolvementinpatientswithhodgkinsornonhodgkinslymphoma
AT karatoprakcumali canpositronemissiontomographyandcomputedtomographybeasubstituteforbonemarrowbiopsyindetectionofbonemarrowinvolvementinpatientswithhodgkinsornonhodgkinslymphoma
AT armcem canpositronemissiontomographyandcomputedtomographybeasubstituteforbonemarrowbiopsyindetectionofbonemarrowinvolvementinpatientswithhodgkinsornonhodgkinslymphoma
AT eskazanahmetemre canpositronemissiontomographyandcomputedtomographybeasubstituteforbonemarrowbiopsyindetectionofbonemarrowinvolvementinpatientswithhodgkinsornonhodgkinslymphoma
AT ayermesut canpositronemissiontomographyandcomputedtomographybeasubstituteforbonemarrowbiopsyindetectionofbonemarrowinvolvementinpatientswithhodgkinsornonhodgkinslymphoma
AT ceritabdullah canpositronemissiontomographyandcomputedtomographybeasubstituteforbonemarrowbiopsyindetectionofbonemarrowinvolvementinpatientswithhodgkinsornonhodgkinslymphoma
AT gozubenlikubra canpositronemissiontomographyandcomputedtomographybeasubstituteforbonemarrowbiopsyindetectionofbonemarrowinvolvementinpatientswithhodgkinsornonhodgkinslymphoma
AT borkuuysalbetul canpositronemissiontomographyandcomputedtomographybeasubstituteforbonemarrowbiopsyindetectionofbonemarrowinvolvementinpatientswithhodgkinsornonhodgkinslymphoma
AT erdemsimge canpositronemissiontomographyandcomputedtomographybeasubstituteforbonemarrowbiopsyindetectionofbonemarrowinvolvementinpatientswithhodgkinsornonhodgkinslymphoma
AT ergulnurhan canpositronemissiontomographyandcomputedtomographybeasubstituteforbonemarrowbiopsyindetectionofbonemarrowinvolvementinpatientswithhodgkinsornonhodgkinslymphoma
AT tatargamze canpositronemissiontomographyandcomputedtomographybeasubstituteforbonemarrowbiopsyindetectionofbonemarrowinvolvementinpatientswithhodgkinsornonhodgkinslymphoma
AT cermiktfikret canpositronemissiontomographyandcomputedtomographybeasubstituteforbonemarrowbiopsyindetectionofbonemarrowinvolvementinpatientswithhodgkinsornonhodgkinslymphoma