Cargando…

Overflow in science and its implications for trust

To explore increasing concerns about scientific misconduct and data irreproducibility in some areas of science, we interviewed a number of senior biomedical researchers. These interviews revealed a perceived decline in trust in the scientific enterprise, in large part because the quantity of new dat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Siebert, Sabina, Machesky, Laura M., Insall, Robert H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4563216/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26365552
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.10825
_version_ 1782389269752446976
author Siebert, Sabina
Machesky, Laura M.
Insall, Robert H.
author_facet Siebert, Sabina
Machesky, Laura M.
Insall, Robert H.
author_sort Siebert, Sabina
collection PubMed
description To explore increasing concerns about scientific misconduct and data irreproducibility in some areas of science, we interviewed a number of senior biomedical researchers. These interviews revealed a perceived decline in trust in the scientific enterprise, in large part because the quantity of new data exceeds the field's ability to process it appropriately. This phenomenon—which is termed ‘overflow’ in social science—has important implications for the integrity of modern biomedical science.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4563216
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45632162015-09-15 Overflow in science and its implications for trust Siebert, Sabina Machesky, Laura M. Insall, Robert H. eLife Feature Article To explore increasing concerns about scientific misconduct and data irreproducibility in some areas of science, we interviewed a number of senior biomedical researchers. These interviews revealed a perceived decline in trust in the scientific enterprise, in large part because the quantity of new data exceeds the field's ability to process it appropriately. This phenomenon—which is termed ‘overflow’ in social science—has important implications for the integrity of modern biomedical science. eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2015-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4563216/ /pubmed/26365552 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.10825 Text en © 2015, Siebert et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Feature Article
Siebert, Sabina
Machesky, Laura M.
Insall, Robert H.
Overflow in science and its implications for trust
title Overflow in science and its implications for trust
title_full Overflow in science and its implications for trust
title_fullStr Overflow in science and its implications for trust
title_full_unstemmed Overflow in science and its implications for trust
title_short Overflow in science and its implications for trust
title_sort overflow in science and its implications for trust
topic Feature Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4563216/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26365552
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.10825
work_keys_str_mv AT siebertsabina overflowinscienceanditsimplicationsfortrust
AT macheskylauram overflowinscienceanditsimplicationsfortrust
AT insallroberth overflowinscienceanditsimplicationsfortrust