Cargando…

Disparities in the completion of steps to kidney transplantation: protocol for a systematic review

INTRODUCTION: Disparities in access to transplantation have been well documented. The extant literature, however, focuses largely on disparities and related barriers for African-American patients and none has used the steps to transplantation as a guiding framework. This review will catalogue dispar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Traino, Heather M, Nonterah, Camilla W, Cyrus, John W, Gillespie, Avrum, Urbanski, Megan, Adair-Kriz, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4563220/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26351187
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008677
_version_ 1782389270664708096
author Traino, Heather M
Nonterah, Camilla W
Cyrus, John W
Gillespie, Avrum
Urbanski, Megan
Adair-Kriz, Michael
author_facet Traino, Heather M
Nonterah, Camilla W
Cyrus, John W
Gillespie, Avrum
Urbanski, Megan
Adair-Kriz, Michael
author_sort Traino, Heather M
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Disparities in access to transplantation have been well documented. The extant literature, however, focuses largely on disparities and related barriers for African-American patients and none has used the steps to transplantation as a guiding framework. This review will catalogue disparities in the steps to transplantation as well as the barriers and facilitators to completion of each step identified in the extant literature. The results of the review will be used to generate recommendations for future research to improve equity in access to kidney transplantation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Standard procedures will be used in the conduct of the review. Searches will be performed using the following electronic databases: PubMed/Medline, PsycINFO, CINHAL, EMBASE, Cochrane library and Web of Science. Reports of original research will be eligible for inclusion if they are published from 2005 to present, written or available in English language, performed in the USA, enrol adult participants (18 years of age or more), and employ descriptive or observational designs. Two authors will independently screen retrieved articles for inclusion. MaxQDA will be used for data analysis and management. All included reports will be coded for article characteristics; disparities identified; barriers and motivators of completion of steps to transplantation; and proposed solutions to disparities and barriers. Each report will be coded independently by two authors and discrepancies resolved by discussion among the full team. A qualitative approach to data analysis is planned. Risk of bias will be assessed using standard procedures. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The findings will provide crucial information on the current status of disparities in access to transplantation. PRISMA guidelines will be followed in reporting the results of the review. It is anticipated that these results will inform research which seeks to increase parity in access to transplantation. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42014015027.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4563220
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45632202015-09-14 Disparities in the completion of steps to kidney transplantation: protocol for a systematic review Traino, Heather M Nonterah, Camilla W Cyrus, John W Gillespie, Avrum Urbanski, Megan Adair-Kriz, Michael BMJ Open Ethics INTRODUCTION: Disparities in access to transplantation have been well documented. The extant literature, however, focuses largely on disparities and related barriers for African-American patients and none has used the steps to transplantation as a guiding framework. This review will catalogue disparities in the steps to transplantation as well as the barriers and facilitators to completion of each step identified in the extant literature. The results of the review will be used to generate recommendations for future research to improve equity in access to kidney transplantation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Standard procedures will be used in the conduct of the review. Searches will be performed using the following electronic databases: PubMed/Medline, PsycINFO, CINHAL, EMBASE, Cochrane library and Web of Science. Reports of original research will be eligible for inclusion if they are published from 2005 to present, written or available in English language, performed in the USA, enrol adult participants (18 years of age or more), and employ descriptive or observational designs. Two authors will independently screen retrieved articles for inclusion. MaxQDA will be used for data analysis and management. All included reports will be coded for article characteristics; disparities identified; barriers and motivators of completion of steps to transplantation; and proposed solutions to disparities and barriers. Each report will be coded independently by two authors and discrepancies resolved by discussion among the full team. A qualitative approach to data analysis is planned. Risk of bias will be assessed using standard procedures. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The findings will provide crucial information on the current status of disparities in access to transplantation. PRISMA guidelines will be followed in reporting the results of the review. It is anticipated that these results will inform research which seeks to increase parity in access to transplantation. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42014015027. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4563220/ /pubmed/26351187 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008677 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Ethics
Traino, Heather M
Nonterah, Camilla W
Cyrus, John W
Gillespie, Avrum
Urbanski, Megan
Adair-Kriz, Michael
Disparities in the completion of steps to kidney transplantation: protocol for a systematic review
title Disparities in the completion of steps to kidney transplantation: protocol for a systematic review
title_full Disparities in the completion of steps to kidney transplantation: protocol for a systematic review
title_fullStr Disparities in the completion of steps to kidney transplantation: protocol for a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Disparities in the completion of steps to kidney transplantation: protocol for a systematic review
title_short Disparities in the completion of steps to kidney transplantation: protocol for a systematic review
title_sort disparities in the completion of steps to kidney transplantation: protocol for a systematic review
topic Ethics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4563220/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26351187
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008677
work_keys_str_mv AT trainoheatherm disparitiesinthecompletionofstepstokidneytransplantationprotocolforasystematicreview
AT nonterahcamillaw disparitiesinthecompletionofstepstokidneytransplantationprotocolforasystematicreview
AT cyrusjohnw disparitiesinthecompletionofstepstokidneytransplantationprotocolforasystematicreview
AT gillespieavrum disparitiesinthecompletionofstepstokidneytransplantationprotocolforasystematicreview
AT urbanskimegan disparitiesinthecompletionofstepstokidneytransplantationprotocolforasystematicreview
AT adairkrizmichael disparitiesinthecompletionofstepstokidneytransplantationprotocolforasystematicreview