Cargando…
Disparities in the completion of steps to kidney transplantation: protocol for a systematic review
INTRODUCTION: Disparities in access to transplantation have been well documented. The extant literature, however, focuses largely on disparities and related barriers for African-American patients and none has used the steps to transplantation as a guiding framework. This review will catalogue dispar...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4563220/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26351187 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008677 |
_version_ | 1782389270664708096 |
---|---|
author | Traino, Heather M Nonterah, Camilla W Cyrus, John W Gillespie, Avrum Urbanski, Megan Adair-Kriz, Michael |
author_facet | Traino, Heather M Nonterah, Camilla W Cyrus, John W Gillespie, Avrum Urbanski, Megan Adair-Kriz, Michael |
author_sort | Traino, Heather M |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Disparities in access to transplantation have been well documented. The extant literature, however, focuses largely on disparities and related barriers for African-American patients and none has used the steps to transplantation as a guiding framework. This review will catalogue disparities in the steps to transplantation as well as the barriers and facilitators to completion of each step identified in the extant literature. The results of the review will be used to generate recommendations for future research to improve equity in access to kidney transplantation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Standard procedures will be used in the conduct of the review. Searches will be performed using the following electronic databases: PubMed/Medline, PsycINFO, CINHAL, EMBASE, Cochrane library and Web of Science. Reports of original research will be eligible for inclusion if they are published from 2005 to present, written or available in English language, performed in the USA, enrol adult participants (18 years of age or more), and employ descriptive or observational designs. Two authors will independently screen retrieved articles for inclusion. MaxQDA will be used for data analysis and management. All included reports will be coded for article characteristics; disparities identified; barriers and motivators of completion of steps to transplantation; and proposed solutions to disparities and barriers. Each report will be coded independently by two authors and discrepancies resolved by discussion among the full team. A qualitative approach to data analysis is planned. Risk of bias will be assessed using standard procedures. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The findings will provide crucial information on the current status of disparities in access to transplantation. PRISMA guidelines will be followed in reporting the results of the review. It is anticipated that these results will inform research which seeks to increase parity in access to transplantation. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42014015027. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4563220 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45632202015-09-14 Disparities in the completion of steps to kidney transplantation: protocol for a systematic review Traino, Heather M Nonterah, Camilla W Cyrus, John W Gillespie, Avrum Urbanski, Megan Adair-Kriz, Michael BMJ Open Ethics INTRODUCTION: Disparities in access to transplantation have been well documented. The extant literature, however, focuses largely on disparities and related barriers for African-American patients and none has used the steps to transplantation as a guiding framework. This review will catalogue disparities in the steps to transplantation as well as the barriers and facilitators to completion of each step identified in the extant literature. The results of the review will be used to generate recommendations for future research to improve equity in access to kidney transplantation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Standard procedures will be used in the conduct of the review. Searches will be performed using the following electronic databases: PubMed/Medline, PsycINFO, CINHAL, EMBASE, Cochrane library and Web of Science. Reports of original research will be eligible for inclusion if they are published from 2005 to present, written or available in English language, performed in the USA, enrol adult participants (18 years of age or more), and employ descriptive or observational designs. Two authors will independently screen retrieved articles for inclusion. MaxQDA will be used for data analysis and management. All included reports will be coded for article characteristics; disparities identified; barriers and motivators of completion of steps to transplantation; and proposed solutions to disparities and barriers. Each report will be coded independently by two authors and discrepancies resolved by discussion among the full team. A qualitative approach to data analysis is planned. Risk of bias will be assessed using standard procedures. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The findings will provide crucial information on the current status of disparities in access to transplantation. PRISMA guidelines will be followed in reporting the results of the review. It is anticipated that these results will inform research which seeks to increase parity in access to transplantation. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42014015027. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4563220/ /pubmed/26351187 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008677 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Ethics Traino, Heather M Nonterah, Camilla W Cyrus, John W Gillespie, Avrum Urbanski, Megan Adair-Kriz, Michael Disparities in the completion of steps to kidney transplantation: protocol for a systematic review |
title | Disparities in the completion of steps to kidney transplantation: protocol for a systematic review |
title_full | Disparities in the completion of steps to kidney transplantation: protocol for a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Disparities in the completion of steps to kidney transplantation: protocol for a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Disparities in the completion of steps to kidney transplantation: protocol for a systematic review |
title_short | Disparities in the completion of steps to kidney transplantation: protocol for a systematic review |
title_sort | disparities in the completion of steps to kidney transplantation: protocol for a systematic review |
topic | Ethics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4563220/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26351187 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008677 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT trainoheatherm disparitiesinthecompletionofstepstokidneytransplantationprotocolforasystematicreview AT nonterahcamillaw disparitiesinthecompletionofstepstokidneytransplantationprotocolforasystematicreview AT cyrusjohnw disparitiesinthecompletionofstepstokidneytransplantationprotocolforasystematicreview AT gillespieavrum disparitiesinthecompletionofstepstokidneytransplantationprotocolforasystematicreview AT urbanskimegan disparitiesinthecompletionofstepstokidneytransplantationprotocolforasystematicreview AT adairkrizmichael disparitiesinthecompletionofstepstokidneytransplantationprotocolforasystematicreview |