Cargando…
Capturing the experiences of patients across multiple complex interventions: a meta-qualitative approach
OBJECTIVES: The perspectives, needs and preferences of individuals with complex health and social needs can be overlooked in the design of healthcare interventions. This study was designed to provide new insights on patient perspectives drawing from the qualitative evaluation of 5 complex healthcare...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4563230/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26351182 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007664 |
_version_ | 1782389272933826560 |
---|---|
author | Webster, Fiona Christian, Jennifer Mansfield, Elizabeth Bhattacharyya, Onil Hawker, Gillian Levinson, Wendy Naglie, Gary Pham, Thuy-Nga Rose, Louise Schull, Michael Sinha, Samir Stergiopoulos, Vicky Upshur, Ross Wilson, Lynn |
author_facet | Webster, Fiona Christian, Jennifer Mansfield, Elizabeth Bhattacharyya, Onil Hawker, Gillian Levinson, Wendy Naglie, Gary Pham, Thuy-Nga Rose, Louise Schull, Michael Sinha, Samir Stergiopoulos, Vicky Upshur, Ross Wilson, Lynn |
author_sort | Webster, Fiona |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The perspectives, needs and preferences of individuals with complex health and social needs can be overlooked in the design of healthcare interventions. This study was designed to provide new insights on patient perspectives drawing from the qualitative evaluation of 5 complex healthcare interventions. SETTING: Patients and their caregivers were recruited from 5 interventions based in primary, hospital and community care in Ontario, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: We included 62 interviews from 44 patients and 18 non-clinical caregivers. INTERVENTION: Our team analysed the transcripts from 5 distinct projects. This approach to qualitative meta-evaluation identifies common issues described by a diverse group of patients, therefore providing potential insights into systems issues. OUTCOME MEASURES: This study is a secondary analysis of qualitative data; therefore, no outcome measures were identified. RESULTS: We identified 5 broad themes that capture the patients’ experience and highlight issues that might not be adequately addressed in complex interventions. In our study, we found that: (1) the emergency department is the unavoidable point of care; (2) patients and caregivers are part of complex and variable family systems; (3) non-medical issues mediate patients’ experiences of health and healthcare delivery; (4) the unanticipated consequences of complex healthcare interventions are often the most valuable; and (5) patient experiences are shaped by the healthcare discourses on medically complex patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that key assumptions about patients that inform intervention design need to be made explicit in order to build capacity to better understand and support patients with multiple chronic diseases. Across many health systems internationally, multiple models are being implemented simultaneously that may have shared features and target similar patients, and a qualitative meta-evaluation approach, thus offers an opportunity for cumulative learning at a system level in addition to informing intervention design and modification. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4563230 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45632302015-09-14 Capturing the experiences of patients across multiple complex interventions: a meta-qualitative approach Webster, Fiona Christian, Jennifer Mansfield, Elizabeth Bhattacharyya, Onil Hawker, Gillian Levinson, Wendy Naglie, Gary Pham, Thuy-Nga Rose, Louise Schull, Michael Sinha, Samir Stergiopoulos, Vicky Upshur, Ross Wilson, Lynn BMJ Open Qualitative Research OBJECTIVES: The perspectives, needs and preferences of individuals with complex health and social needs can be overlooked in the design of healthcare interventions. This study was designed to provide new insights on patient perspectives drawing from the qualitative evaluation of 5 complex healthcare interventions. SETTING: Patients and their caregivers were recruited from 5 interventions based in primary, hospital and community care in Ontario, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: We included 62 interviews from 44 patients and 18 non-clinical caregivers. INTERVENTION: Our team analysed the transcripts from 5 distinct projects. This approach to qualitative meta-evaluation identifies common issues described by a diverse group of patients, therefore providing potential insights into systems issues. OUTCOME MEASURES: This study is a secondary analysis of qualitative data; therefore, no outcome measures were identified. RESULTS: We identified 5 broad themes that capture the patients’ experience and highlight issues that might not be adequately addressed in complex interventions. In our study, we found that: (1) the emergency department is the unavoidable point of care; (2) patients and caregivers are part of complex and variable family systems; (3) non-medical issues mediate patients’ experiences of health and healthcare delivery; (4) the unanticipated consequences of complex healthcare interventions are often the most valuable; and (5) patient experiences are shaped by the healthcare discourses on medically complex patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that key assumptions about patients that inform intervention design need to be made explicit in order to build capacity to better understand and support patients with multiple chronic diseases. Across many health systems internationally, multiple models are being implemented simultaneously that may have shared features and target similar patients, and a qualitative meta-evaluation approach, thus offers an opportunity for cumulative learning at a system level in addition to informing intervention design and modification. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4563230/ /pubmed/26351182 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007664 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Qualitative Research Webster, Fiona Christian, Jennifer Mansfield, Elizabeth Bhattacharyya, Onil Hawker, Gillian Levinson, Wendy Naglie, Gary Pham, Thuy-Nga Rose, Louise Schull, Michael Sinha, Samir Stergiopoulos, Vicky Upshur, Ross Wilson, Lynn Capturing the experiences of patients across multiple complex interventions: a meta-qualitative approach |
title | Capturing the experiences of patients across multiple complex interventions: a meta-qualitative approach |
title_full | Capturing the experiences of patients across multiple complex interventions: a meta-qualitative approach |
title_fullStr | Capturing the experiences of patients across multiple complex interventions: a meta-qualitative approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Capturing the experiences of patients across multiple complex interventions: a meta-qualitative approach |
title_short | Capturing the experiences of patients across multiple complex interventions: a meta-qualitative approach |
title_sort | capturing the experiences of patients across multiple complex interventions: a meta-qualitative approach |
topic | Qualitative Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4563230/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26351182 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007664 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT websterfiona capturingtheexperiencesofpatientsacrossmultiplecomplexinterventionsametaqualitativeapproach AT christianjennifer capturingtheexperiencesofpatientsacrossmultiplecomplexinterventionsametaqualitativeapproach AT mansfieldelizabeth capturingtheexperiencesofpatientsacrossmultiplecomplexinterventionsametaqualitativeapproach AT bhattacharyyaonil capturingtheexperiencesofpatientsacrossmultiplecomplexinterventionsametaqualitativeapproach AT hawkergillian capturingtheexperiencesofpatientsacrossmultiplecomplexinterventionsametaqualitativeapproach AT levinsonwendy capturingtheexperiencesofpatientsacrossmultiplecomplexinterventionsametaqualitativeapproach AT nagliegary capturingtheexperiencesofpatientsacrossmultiplecomplexinterventionsametaqualitativeapproach AT phamthuynga capturingtheexperiencesofpatientsacrossmultiplecomplexinterventionsametaqualitativeapproach AT roselouise capturingtheexperiencesofpatientsacrossmultiplecomplexinterventionsametaqualitativeapproach AT schullmichael capturingtheexperiencesofpatientsacrossmultiplecomplexinterventionsametaqualitativeapproach AT sinhasamir capturingtheexperiencesofpatientsacrossmultiplecomplexinterventionsametaqualitativeapproach AT stergiopoulosvicky capturingtheexperiencesofpatientsacrossmultiplecomplexinterventionsametaqualitativeapproach AT upshurross capturingtheexperiencesofpatientsacrossmultiplecomplexinterventionsametaqualitativeapproach AT wilsonlynn capturingtheexperiencesofpatientsacrossmultiplecomplexinterventionsametaqualitativeapproach |