Cargando…

Capturing the experiences of patients across multiple complex interventions: a meta-qualitative approach

OBJECTIVES: The perspectives, needs and preferences of individuals with complex health and social needs can be overlooked in the design of healthcare interventions. This study was designed to provide new insights on patient perspectives drawing from the qualitative evaluation of 5 complex healthcare...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Webster, Fiona, Christian, Jennifer, Mansfield, Elizabeth, Bhattacharyya, Onil, Hawker, Gillian, Levinson, Wendy, Naglie, Gary, Pham, Thuy-Nga, Rose, Louise, Schull, Michael, Sinha, Samir, Stergiopoulos, Vicky, Upshur, Ross, Wilson, Lynn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4563230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26351182
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007664
_version_ 1782389272933826560
author Webster, Fiona
Christian, Jennifer
Mansfield, Elizabeth
Bhattacharyya, Onil
Hawker, Gillian
Levinson, Wendy
Naglie, Gary
Pham, Thuy-Nga
Rose, Louise
Schull, Michael
Sinha, Samir
Stergiopoulos, Vicky
Upshur, Ross
Wilson, Lynn
author_facet Webster, Fiona
Christian, Jennifer
Mansfield, Elizabeth
Bhattacharyya, Onil
Hawker, Gillian
Levinson, Wendy
Naglie, Gary
Pham, Thuy-Nga
Rose, Louise
Schull, Michael
Sinha, Samir
Stergiopoulos, Vicky
Upshur, Ross
Wilson, Lynn
author_sort Webster, Fiona
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The perspectives, needs and preferences of individuals with complex health and social needs can be overlooked in the design of healthcare interventions. This study was designed to provide new insights on patient perspectives drawing from the qualitative evaluation of 5 complex healthcare interventions. SETTING: Patients and their caregivers were recruited from 5 interventions based in primary, hospital and community care in Ontario, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: We included 62 interviews from 44 patients and 18 non-clinical caregivers. INTERVENTION: Our team analysed the transcripts from 5 distinct projects. This approach to qualitative meta-evaluation identifies common issues described by a diverse group of patients, therefore providing potential insights into systems issues. OUTCOME MEASURES: This study is a secondary analysis of qualitative data; therefore, no outcome measures were identified. RESULTS: We identified 5 broad themes that capture the patients’ experience and highlight issues that might not be adequately addressed in complex interventions. In our study, we found that: (1) the emergency department is the unavoidable point of care; (2) patients and caregivers are part of complex and variable family systems; (3) non-medical issues mediate patients’ experiences of health and healthcare delivery; (4) the unanticipated consequences of complex healthcare interventions are often the most valuable; and (5) patient experiences are shaped by the healthcare discourses on medically complex patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that key assumptions about patients that inform intervention design need to be made explicit in order to build capacity to better understand and support patients with multiple chronic diseases. Across many health systems internationally, multiple models are being implemented simultaneously that may have shared features and target similar patients, and a qualitative meta-evaluation approach, thus offers an opportunity for cumulative learning at a system level in addition to informing intervention design and modification.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4563230
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45632302015-09-14 Capturing the experiences of patients across multiple complex interventions: a meta-qualitative approach Webster, Fiona Christian, Jennifer Mansfield, Elizabeth Bhattacharyya, Onil Hawker, Gillian Levinson, Wendy Naglie, Gary Pham, Thuy-Nga Rose, Louise Schull, Michael Sinha, Samir Stergiopoulos, Vicky Upshur, Ross Wilson, Lynn BMJ Open Qualitative Research OBJECTIVES: The perspectives, needs and preferences of individuals with complex health and social needs can be overlooked in the design of healthcare interventions. This study was designed to provide new insights on patient perspectives drawing from the qualitative evaluation of 5 complex healthcare interventions. SETTING: Patients and their caregivers were recruited from 5 interventions based in primary, hospital and community care in Ontario, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: We included 62 interviews from 44 patients and 18 non-clinical caregivers. INTERVENTION: Our team analysed the transcripts from 5 distinct projects. This approach to qualitative meta-evaluation identifies common issues described by a diverse group of patients, therefore providing potential insights into systems issues. OUTCOME MEASURES: This study is a secondary analysis of qualitative data; therefore, no outcome measures were identified. RESULTS: We identified 5 broad themes that capture the patients’ experience and highlight issues that might not be adequately addressed in complex interventions. In our study, we found that: (1) the emergency department is the unavoidable point of care; (2) patients and caregivers are part of complex and variable family systems; (3) non-medical issues mediate patients’ experiences of health and healthcare delivery; (4) the unanticipated consequences of complex healthcare interventions are often the most valuable; and (5) patient experiences are shaped by the healthcare discourses on medically complex patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that key assumptions about patients that inform intervention design need to be made explicit in order to build capacity to better understand and support patients with multiple chronic diseases. Across many health systems internationally, multiple models are being implemented simultaneously that may have shared features and target similar patients, and a qualitative meta-evaluation approach, thus offers an opportunity for cumulative learning at a system level in addition to informing intervention design and modification. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4563230/ /pubmed/26351182 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007664 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Qualitative Research
Webster, Fiona
Christian, Jennifer
Mansfield, Elizabeth
Bhattacharyya, Onil
Hawker, Gillian
Levinson, Wendy
Naglie, Gary
Pham, Thuy-Nga
Rose, Louise
Schull, Michael
Sinha, Samir
Stergiopoulos, Vicky
Upshur, Ross
Wilson, Lynn
Capturing the experiences of patients across multiple complex interventions: a meta-qualitative approach
title Capturing the experiences of patients across multiple complex interventions: a meta-qualitative approach
title_full Capturing the experiences of patients across multiple complex interventions: a meta-qualitative approach
title_fullStr Capturing the experiences of patients across multiple complex interventions: a meta-qualitative approach
title_full_unstemmed Capturing the experiences of patients across multiple complex interventions: a meta-qualitative approach
title_short Capturing the experiences of patients across multiple complex interventions: a meta-qualitative approach
title_sort capturing the experiences of patients across multiple complex interventions: a meta-qualitative approach
topic Qualitative Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4563230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26351182
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007664
work_keys_str_mv AT websterfiona capturingtheexperiencesofpatientsacrossmultiplecomplexinterventionsametaqualitativeapproach
AT christianjennifer capturingtheexperiencesofpatientsacrossmultiplecomplexinterventionsametaqualitativeapproach
AT mansfieldelizabeth capturingtheexperiencesofpatientsacrossmultiplecomplexinterventionsametaqualitativeapproach
AT bhattacharyyaonil capturingtheexperiencesofpatientsacrossmultiplecomplexinterventionsametaqualitativeapproach
AT hawkergillian capturingtheexperiencesofpatientsacrossmultiplecomplexinterventionsametaqualitativeapproach
AT levinsonwendy capturingtheexperiencesofpatientsacrossmultiplecomplexinterventionsametaqualitativeapproach
AT nagliegary capturingtheexperiencesofpatientsacrossmultiplecomplexinterventionsametaqualitativeapproach
AT phamthuynga capturingtheexperiencesofpatientsacrossmultiplecomplexinterventionsametaqualitativeapproach
AT roselouise capturingtheexperiencesofpatientsacrossmultiplecomplexinterventionsametaqualitativeapproach
AT schullmichael capturingtheexperiencesofpatientsacrossmultiplecomplexinterventionsametaqualitativeapproach
AT sinhasamir capturingtheexperiencesofpatientsacrossmultiplecomplexinterventionsametaqualitativeapproach
AT stergiopoulosvicky capturingtheexperiencesofpatientsacrossmultiplecomplexinterventionsametaqualitativeapproach
AT upshurross capturingtheexperiencesofpatientsacrossmultiplecomplexinterventionsametaqualitativeapproach
AT wilsonlynn capturingtheexperiencesofpatientsacrossmultiplecomplexinterventionsametaqualitativeapproach