Cargando…
Reliability of measuring pelvic floor elevation with a diagnostic ultrasonic imaging device
[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability of measuring the amount of pelvic floor elevation during pelvic and abdominal muscle contraction with a diagnostic ultrasonic imaging device. [Subjects] The study group comprised 11 healthy women without urinary incontinence or p...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Society of Physical Therapy Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4563298/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26355420 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.2495 |
_version_ | 1782389288249327616 |
---|---|
author | Ubukata, Hitomi Maruyama, Hitoshi Huo, Ming |
author_facet | Ubukata, Hitomi Maruyama, Hitoshi Huo, Ming |
author_sort | Ubukata, Hitomi |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Purpose] The purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability of measuring the amount of pelvic floor elevation during pelvic and abdominal muscle contraction with a diagnostic ultrasonic imaging device. [Subjects] The study group comprised 11 healthy women without urinary incontinence or previous birth experience. [Methods] We measured the displacement elevation of the bladder base during contraction of the abdominal and pelvic floor muscles was measured using a diagnostic ultrasonic imaging device. The exercise was a four-part operation undertaken with the subjects in the lateral position. The reliability analysis included use of the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess the reliability. [Results] ICC (1.1) values for the pelvic floor elevation measurement with a diagnostic ultrasonic imaging device were 0.98 [contraction of the transversus abdominis (TrA) muscle], 0.99 [contraction of pelvic floor muscles (PFMs)], 0.98 (co-contraction of the TrA and PFMs), and 0.98 (resistance of the TrA and PFMs). This study proved the reliability of the method because the coefficient of reliability was 0.97 or more for all of the measurements, even for those during exercise. [Conclusion] The diagnostic ultrasonic imaging device measures pelvic floor elevation with high reliability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4563298 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | The Society of Physical Therapy Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45632982015-09-09 Reliability of measuring pelvic floor elevation with a diagnostic ultrasonic imaging device Ubukata, Hitomi Maruyama, Hitoshi Huo, Ming J Phys Ther Sci Original Article [Purpose] The purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability of measuring the amount of pelvic floor elevation during pelvic and abdominal muscle contraction with a diagnostic ultrasonic imaging device. [Subjects] The study group comprised 11 healthy women without urinary incontinence or previous birth experience. [Methods] We measured the displacement elevation of the bladder base during contraction of the abdominal and pelvic floor muscles was measured using a diagnostic ultrasonic imaging device. The exercise was a four-part operation undertaken with the subjects in the lateral position. The reliability analysis included use of the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess the reliability. [Results] ICC (1.1) values for the pelvic floor elevation measurement with a diagnostic ultrasonic imaging device were 0.98 [contraction of the transversus abdominis (TrA) muscle], 0.99 [contraction of pelvic floor muscles (PFMs)], 0.98 (co-contraction of the TrA and PFMs), and 0.98 (resistance of the TrA and PFMs). This study proved the reliability of the method because the coefficient of reliability was 0.97 or more for all of the measurements, even for those during exercise. [Conclusion] The diagnostic ultrasonic imaging device measures pelvic floor elevation with high reliability. The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2015-08-28 2015-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4563298/ /pubmed/26355420 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.2495 Text en 2015©by the Society of Physical Therapy Science. Published by IPEC Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ubukata, Hitomi Maruyama, Hitoshi Huo, Ming Reliability of measuring pelvic floor elevation with a diagnostic ultrasonic imaging device |
title | Reliability of measuring pelvic floor elevation with a diagnostic ultrasonic
imaging device |
title_full | Reliability of measuring pelvic floor elevation with a diagnostic ultrasonic
imaging device |
title_fullStr | Reliability of measuring pelvic floor elevation with a diagnostic ultrasonic
imaging device |
title_full_unstemmed | Reliability of measuring pelvic floor elevation with a diagnostic ultrasonic
imaging device |
title_short | Reliability of measuring pelvic floor elevation with a diagnostic ultrasonic
imaging device |
title_sort | reliability of measuring pelvic floor elevation with a diagnostic ultrasonic
imaging device |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4563298/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26355420 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.2495 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ubukatahitomi reliabilityofmeasuringpelvicfloorelevationwithadiagnosticultrasonicimagingdevice AT maruyamahitoshi reliabilityofmeasuringpelvicfloorelevationwithadiagnosticultrasonicimagingdevice AT huoming reliabilityofmeasuringpelvicfloorelevationwithadiagnosticultrasonicimagingdevice |