Cargando…

Reliability of measuring pelvic floor elevation with a diagnostic ultrasonic imaging device

[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability of measuring the amount of pelvic floor elevation during pelvic and abdominal muscle contraction with a diagnostic ultrasonic imaging device. [Subjects] The study group comprised 11 healthy women without urinary incontinence or p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ubukata, Hitomi, Maruyama, Hitoshi, Huo, Ming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4563298/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26355420
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.2495
_version_ 1782389288249327616
author Ubukata, Hitomi
Maruyama, Hitoshi
Huo, Ming
author_facet Ubukata, Hitomi
Maruyama, Hitoshi
Huo, Ming
author_sort Ubukata, Hitomi
collection PubMed
description [Purpose] The purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability of measuring the amount of pelvic floor elevation during pelvic and abdominal muscle contraction with a diagnostic ultrasonic imaging device. [Subjects] The study group comprised 11 healthy women without urinary incontinence or previous birth experience. [Methods] We measured the displacement elevation of the bladder base during contraction of the abdominal and pelvic floor muscles was measured using a diagnostic ultrasonic imaging device. The exercise was a four-part operation undertaken with the subjects in the lateral position. The reliability analysis included use of the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess the reliability. [Results] ICC (1.1) values for the pelvic floor elevation measurement with a diagnostic ultrasonic imaging device were 0.98 [contraction of the transversus abdominis (TrA) muscle], 0.99 [contraction of pelvic floor muscles (PFMs)], 0.98 (co-contraction of the TrA and PFMs), and 0.98 (resistance of the TrA and PFMs). This study proved the reliability of the method because the coefficient of reliability was 0.97 or more for all of the measurements, even for those during exercise. [Conclusion] The diagnostic ultrasonic imaging device measures pelvic floor elevation with high reliability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4563298
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher The Society of Physical Therapy Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45632982015-09-09 Reliability of measuring pelvic floor elevation with a diagnostic ultrasonic imaging device Ubukata, Hitomi Maruyama, Hitoshi Huo, Ming J Phys Ther Sci Original Article [Purpose] The purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability of measuring the amount of pelvic floor elevation during pelvic and abdominal muscle contraction with a diagnostic ultrasonic imaging device. [Subjects] The study group comprised 11 healthy women without urinary incontinence or previous birth experience. [Methods] We measured the displacement elevation of the bladder base during contraction of the abdominal and pelvic floor muscles was measured using a diagnostic ultrasonic imaging device. The exercise was a four-part operation undertaken with the subjects in the lateral position. The reliability analysis included use of the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess the reliability. [Results] ICC (1.1) values for the pelvic floor elevation measurement with a diagnostic ultrasonic imaging device were 0.98 [contraction of the transversus abdominis (TrA) muscle], 0.99 [contraction of pelvic floor muscles (PFMs)], 0.98 (co-contraction of the TrA and PFMs), and 0.98 (resistance of the TrA and PFMs). This study proved the reliability of the method because the coefficient of reliability was 0.97 or more for all of the measurements, even for those during exercise. [Conclusion] The diagnostic ultrasonic imaging device measures pelvic floor elevation with high reliability. The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2015-08-28 2015-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4563298/ /pubmed/26355420 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.2495 Text en 2015©by the Society of Physical Therapy Science. Published by IPEC Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ubukata, Hitomi
Maruyama, Hitoshi
Huo, Ming
Reliability of measuring pelvic floor elevation with a diagnostic ultrasonic imaging device
title Reliability of measuring pelvic floor elevation with a diagnostic ultrasonic imaging device
title_full Reliability of measuring pelvic floor elevation with a diagnostic ultrasonic imaging device
title_fullStr Reliability of measuring pelvic floor elevation with a diagnostic ultrasonic imaging device
title_full_unstemmed Reliability of measuring pelvic floor elevation with a diagnostic ultrasonic imaging device
title_short Reliability of measuring pelvic floor elevation with a diagnostic ultrasonic imaging device
title_sort reliability of measuring pelvic floor elevation with a diagnostic ultrasonic imaging device
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4563298/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26355420
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.2495
work_keys_str_mv AT ubukatahitomi reliabilityofmeasuringpelvicfloorelevationwithadiagnosticultrasonicimagingdevice
AT maruyamahitoshi reliabilityofmeasuringpelvicfloorelevationwithadiagnosticultrasonicimagingdevice
AT huoming reliabilityofmeasuringpelvicfloorelevationwithadiagnosticultrasonicimagingdevice