Cargando…
An Updated Meta-Analysis of Laparoscopic Versus Open Repair for Perforated Peptic Ulcer
Laparoscopic repair (LR) for perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) has been introduced since 1990. Although many studies comparing LR with open repair (OR) have been published, controversy remains regarding the clinical utility of laparoscopic techniques for the treatment of PPU. Thus, it is necessary for u...
Autores principales: | Zhou, Chunhua, Wang, Weizhi, Wang, Jiwei, Zhang, Xiaoyu, Zhang, Qun, Li, Bowen, Xu, Zekuan |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4563564/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26350958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep13976 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Meta-analysis of Laparoscopic Versus Open Repair of Perforated Peptic Ulcer
por: Antoniou, Stavros A., et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Randomized Clinical Trial of Laparoscopic Versus Open Repair of the Perforated Peptic Ulcer: The LAMA Trial
por: Bertleff, Mariëtta J. O. E., et al.
Publicado: (2009) -
Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcers with U-CLIP(®)
por: Guglielminotti, Piero, et al.
Publicado: (2009) -
Laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated peptic ulcers: analysis of outcomes and identification of predictive factors of conversion
por: Tartaglia, Dario, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Potential use of peptic ulcer perforation (PULP) score as a conversion index of laparoscopic-perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) repair
por: Wang, Yu-Hao, et al.
Publicado: (2020)