Cargando…
Resident work hours: why keeping the status quo may not be such a bad thing
Resident duty hours have become an increasingly debated topic in post-graduate medical education. Work-hour restrictions have been implemented for first-year residents in the US and more recently for all residents in Quebec. Current and future work-hour rules affect a variety of stakeholders: govern...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
University of Saskatchewan
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4563602/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26451216 |
_version_ | 1782389316557733888 |
---|---|
author | Razik, Roshan Slessarev, Marat |
author_facet | Razik, Roshan Slessarev, Marat |
author_sort | Razik, Roshan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Resident duty hours have become an increasingly debated topic in post-graduate medical education. Work-hour restrictions have been implemented for first-year residents in the US and more recently for all residents in Quebec. Current and future work-hour rules affect a variety of stakeholders: government, hospitals, residency training programs, patients, and most of all residents. In this article, we hope to examine the issue from a Canadian perspective and delineate some of the reasons why changing the current call structure may have potentially deleterious effects to all those concerned. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4563602 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | University of Saskatchewan |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45636022015-10-08 Resident work hours: why keeping the status quo may not be such a bad thing Razik, Roshan Slessarev, Marat Can Med Educ J Comments & Reactions Resident duty hours have become an increasingly debated topic in post-graduate medical education. Work-hour restrictions have been implemented for first-year residents in the US and more recently for all residents in Quebec. Current and future work-hour rules affect a variety of stakeholders: government, hospitals, residency training programs, patients, and most of all residents. In this article, we hope to examine the issue from a Canadian perspective and delineate some of the reasons why changing the current call structure may have potentially deleterious effects to all those concerned. University of Saskatchewan 2013-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4563602/ /pubmed/26451216 Text en © 2013; Razik and Slessarev licensee Synergies Partners This is an Open Journal Systems article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Comments & Reactions Razik, Roshan Slessarev, Marat Resident work hours: why keeping the status quo may not be such a bad thing |
title | Resident work hours: why keeping the status quo may not be such a bad thing |
title_full | Resident work hours: why keeping the status quo may not be such a bad thing |
title_fullStr | Resident work hours: why keeping the status quo may not be such a bad thing |
title_full_unstemmed | Resident work hours: why keeping the status quo may not be such a bad thing |
title_short | Resident work hours: why keeping the status quo may not be such a bad thing |
title_sort | resident work hours: why keeping the status quo may not be such a bad thing |
topic | Comments & Reactions |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4563602/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26451216 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT razikroshan residentworkhourswhykeepingthestatusquomaynotbesuchabadthing AT slessarevmarat residentworkhourswhykeepingthestatusquomaynotbesuchabadthing |