Cargando…

The anesthetic considerations while performing supraclavicular brachial plexus block in emergency surgical patients using a nerve stimulator

Regional anesthesia is favored in patients who undergo emergency extremity (limb) surgery, and specifically so in the absence of fasting status. In the absence of ultrasonic guidance, the nerve stimulator still remains a valuable tool in performing a brachial block, but its use is difficult in an em...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tantry, Thrivikrama Padur, Shetty, Pramal, Shetty, Rithesh, Shenoy, Sunil P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4563968/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26417145
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.156369
_version_ 1782389358414790656
author Tantry, Thrivikrama Padur
Shetty, Pramal
Shetty, Rithesh
Shenoy, Sunil P.
author_facet Tantry, Thrivikrama Padur
Shetty, Pramal
Shetty, Rithesh
Shenoy, Sunil P.
author_sort Tantry, Thrivikrama Padur
collection PubMed
description Regional anesthesia is favored in patients who undergo emergency extremity (limb) surgery, and specifically so in the absence of fasting status. In the absence of ultrasonic guidance, the nerve stimulator still remains a valuable tool in performing a brachial block, but its use is difficult in an emergency surgical patient and greater cautious approach is essential. We identified the supraclavicular plexus by the nerve stimulation-motor response technique as follows. Anterior chest muscles contractions, diaphragmatic contraction, deltoid contractions, and posterior shoulder girdle muscle contractions when identified were taken as “negative response” with decreasing stimulating current. A forearm muscle contraction, especially “wrist flexion” and “finger flexion” at 0.5 mA of current was taken as “positive response.” If no positive response was identified, the “elbow flexion” was considered as the final positive response for successful drug placement. The series of patients had difficulty for administering both general and regional anesthesia and we considered them as complex scenarios. The risk of the block failure was weighed heavily against the benefits of its success. The described series includes patients who had successful outcomes in the end and the techniques, merits, and risks are highlighted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4563968
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45639682015-09-28 The anesthetic considerations while performing supraclavicular brachial plexus block in emergency surgical patients using a nerve stimulator Tantry, Thrivikrama Padur Shetty, Pramal Shetty, Rithesh Shenoy, Sunil P. Anesth Essays Res Case Report Regional anesthesia is favored in patients who undergo emergency extremity (limb) surgery, and specifically so in the absence of fasting status. In the absence of ultrasonic guidance, the nerve stimulator still remains a valuable tool in performing a brachial block, but its use is difficult in an emergency surgical patient and greater cautious approach is essential. We identified the supraclavicular plexus by the nerve stimulation-motor response technique as follows. Anterior chest muscles contractions, diaphragmatic contraction, deltoid contractions, and posterior shoulder girdle muscle contractions when identified were taken as “negative response” with decreasing stimulating current. A forearm muscle contraction, especially “wrist flexion” and “finger flexion” at 0.5 mA of current was taken as “positive response.” If no positive response was identified, the “elbow flexion” was considered as the final positive response for successful drug placement. The series of patients had difficulty for administering both general and regional anesthesia and we considered them as complex scenarios. The risk of the block failure was weighed heavily against the benefits of its success. The described series includes patients who had successful outcomes in the end and the techniques, merits, and risks are highlighted. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4563968/ /pubmed/26417145 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.156369 Text en Copyright: © Anesthesia: Essays and Researches http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Case Report
Tantry, Thrivikrama Padur
Shetty, Pramal
Shetty, Rithesh
Shenoy, Sunil P.
The anesthetic considerations while performing supraclavicular brachial plexus block in emergency surgical patients using a nerve stimulator
title The anesthetic considerations while performing supraclavicular brachial plexus block in emergency surgical patients using a nerve stimulator
title_full The anesthetic considerations while performing supraclavicular brachial plexus block in emergency surgical patients using a nerve stimulator
title_fullStr The anesthetic considerations while performing supraclavicular brachial plexus block in emergency surgical patients using a nerve stimulator
title_full_unstemmed The anesthetic considerations while performing supraclavicular brachial plexus block in emergency surgical patients using a nerve stimulator
title_short The anesthetic considerations while performing supraclavicular brachial plexus block in emergency surgical patients using a nerve stimulator
title_sort anesthetic considerations while performing supraclavicular brachial plexus block in emergency surgical patients using a nerve stimulator
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4563968/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26417145
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.156369
work_keys_str_mv AT tantrythrivikramapadur theanestheticconsiderationswhileperformingsupraclavicularbrachialplexusblockinemergencysurgicalpatientsusinganervestimulator
AT shettypramal theanestheticconsiderationswhileperformingsupraclavicularbrachialplexusblockinemergencysurgicalpatientsusinganervestimulator
AT shettyrithesh theanestheticconsiderationswhileperformingsupraclavicularbrachialplexusblockinemergencysurgicalpatientsusinganervestimulator
AT shenoysunilp theanestheticconsiderationswhileperformingsupraclavicularbrachialplexusblockinemergencysurgicalpatientsusinganervestimulator
AT tantrythrivikramapadur anestheticconsiderationswhileperformingsupraclavicularbrachialplexusblockinemergencysurgicalpatientsusinganervestimulator
AT shettypramal anestheticconsiderationswhileperformingsupraclavicularbrachialplexusblockinemergencysurgicalpatientsusinganervestimulator
AT shettyrithesh anestheticconsiderationswhileperformingsupraclavicularbrachialplexusblockinemergencysurgicalpatientsusinganervestimulator
AT shenoysunilp anestheticconsiderationswhileperformingsupraclavicularbrachialplexusblockinemergencysurgicalpatientsusinganervestimulator