Cargando…
An analysis of marketing authorisation applications via the mutual recognition and decentralised procedures in Europe
PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to provide a comprehensive overview of the outcomes of marketing authorisation applications via the mutual recognition and decentralised procedures (MRP/DCP) and assess determinants of licensing failure during CMDh referral procedures. METHODS: All MRP/DCP procedure...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4564446/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26204969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-015-1904-1 |
_version_ | 1782389431145070592 |
---|---|
author | Ebbers, Hans C. Langedijk, Joris Bouvy, Jacoline C. Hoekman, Jarno Boon, Wouter P. C. de Jong, Jean Philippe De Bruin, Marie L. |
author_facet | Ebbers, Hans C. Langedijk, Joris Bouvy, Jacoline C. Hoekman, Jarno Boon, Wouter P. C. de Jong, Jean Philippe De Bruin, Marie L. |
author_sort | Ebbers, Hans C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to provide a comprehensive overview of the outcomes of marketing authorisation applications via the mutual recognition and decentralised procedures (MRP/DCP) and assess determinants of licensing failure during CMDh referral procedures. METHODS: All MRP/DCP procedures to the Co-ordination group for Mutual recognition and Decentralised procedures–human (CMDh) during the period from January 2006 to December 2013 were analysed. Reasons for starting referral procedures were scored. In addition, a survey under pharmaceutical companies was performed to estimate the frequency of licensing failure prior to CMDh referrals. RESULTS: During the study period, 10392 MRP/DCP procedures were finalized. Three hundred seventy-seven (3.6 %) resulted in a referral procedure, of which 70 (19 %) resulted in licensing failure, defined as refusal or withdrawal of the application. The frequency of CMDh referrals decreased from 14.5 % in 2006 to 1.6 % in 2013. Of all referrals, 272 (72 %) were resolved through consensus within the CMDh, the remaining 105 (28 %) were resolved at the level of the CHMP. Most referrals were started because of objections raised about the clinical development program. Study design issues and objections about the demonstration of equivalence were most likely to result in licensing failure. An estimated 11 % of all MRP/DCP procedures resulted in licensing failure prior to CMDh referral. CONCLUSION: Whereas the absolute number of MRP/DCP procedures resulting in a referral has reduced substantially over the past years, no specific time trend could be observed regarding the frequency of referrals resulting in licensing failure. Increased knowledge at the level of companies and regulators has reduced the frequency of late-stage failure of marketing applications via the MRP/DCP. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00228-015-1904-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4564446 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45644462015-09-15 An analysis of marketing authorisation applications via the mutual recognition and decentralised procedures in Europe Ebbers, Hans C. Langedijk, Joris Bouvy, Jacoline C. Hoekman, Jarno Boon, Wouter P. C. de Jong, Jean Philippe De Bruin, Marie L. Eur J Clin Pharmacol Pharmacoepidemiology and Prescription PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to provide a comprehensive overview of the outcomes of marketing authorisation applications via the mutual recognition and decentralised procedures (MRP/DCP) and assess determinants of licensing failure during CMDh referral procedures. METHODS: All MRP/DCP procedures to the Co-ordination group for Mutual recognition and Decentralised procedures–human (CMDh) during the period from January 2006 to December 2013 were analysed. Reasons for starting referral procedures were scored. In addition, a survey under pharmaceutical companies was performed to estimate the frequency of licensing failure prior to CMDh referrals. RESULTS: During the study period, 10392 MRP/DCP procedures were finalized. Three hundred seventy-seven (3.6 %) resulted in a referral procedure, of which 70 (19 %) resulted in licensing failure, defined as refusal or withdrawal of the application. The frequency of CMDh referrals decreased from 14.5 % in 2006 to 1.6 % in 2013. Of all referrals, 272 (72 %) were resolved through consensus within the CMDh, the remaining 105 (28 %) were resolved at the level of the CHMP. Most referrals were started because of objections raised about the clinical development program. Study design issues and objections about the demonstration of equivalence were most likely to result in licensing failure. An estimated 11 % of all MRP/DCP procedures resulted in licensing failure prior to CMDh referral. CONCLUSION: Whereas the absolute number of MRP/DCP procedures resulting in a referral has reduced substantially over the past years, no specific time trend could be observed regarding the frequency of referrals resulting in licensing failure. Increased knowledge at the level of companies and regulators has reduced the frequency of late-stage failure of marketing applications via the MRP/DCP. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00228-015-1904-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-07-25 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4564446/ /pubmed/26204969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-015-1904-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Pharmacoepidemiology and Prescription Ebbers, Hans C. Langedijk, Joris Bouvy, Jacoline C. Hoekman, Jarno Boon, Wouter P. C. de Jong, Jean Philippe De Bruin, Marie L. An analysis of marketing authorisation applications via the mutual recognition and decentralised procedures in Europe |
title | An analysis of marketing authorisation applications via the mutual recognition and decentralised procedures in Europe |
title_full | An analysis of marketing authorisation applications via the mutual recognition and decentralised procedures in Europe |
title_fullStr | An analysis of marketing authorisation applications via the mutual recognition and decentralised procedures in Europe |
title_full_unstemmed | An analysis of marketing authorisation applications via the mutual recognition and decentralised procedures in Europe |
title_short | An analysis of marketing authorisation applications via the mutual recognition and decentralised procedures in Europe |
title_sort | analysis of marketing authorisation applications via the mutual recognition and decentralised procedures in europe |
topic | Pharmacoepidemiology and Prescription |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4564446/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26204969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-015-1904-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ebbershansc ananalysisofmarketingauthorisationapplicationsviathemutualrecognitionanddecentralisedproceduresineurope AT langedijkjoris ananalysisofmarketingauthorisationapplicationsviathemutualrecognitionanddecentralisedproceduresineurope AT bouvyjacolinec ananalysisofmarketingauthorisationapplicationsviathemutualrecognitionanddecentralisedproceduresineurope AT hoekmanjarno ananalysisofmarketingauthorisationapplicationsviathemutualrecognitionanddecentralisedproceduresineurope AT boonwouterpc ananalysisofmarketingauthorisationapplicationsviathemutualrecognitionanddecentralisedproceduresineurope AT dejongjeanphilippe ananalysisofmarketingauthorisationapplicationsviathemutualrecognitionanddecentralisedproceduresineurope AT debruinmariel ananalysisofmarketingauthorisationapplicationsviathemutualrecognitionanddecentralisedproceduresineurope AT ebbershansc analysisofmarketingauthorisationapplicationsviathemutualrecognitionanddecentralisedproceduresineurope AT langedijkjoris analysisofmarketingauthorisationapplicationsviathemutualrecognitionanddecentralisedproceduresineurope AT bouvyjacolinec analysisofmarketingauthorisationapplicationsviathemutualrecognitionanddecentralisedproceduresineurope AT hoekmanjarno analysisofmarketingauthorisationapplicationsviathemutualrecognitionanddecentralisedproceduresineurope AT boonwouterpc analysisofmarketingauthorisationapplicationsviathemutualrecognitionanddecentralisedproceduresineurope AT dejongjeanphilippe analysisofmarketingauthorisationapplicationsviathemutualrecognitionanddecentralisedproceduresineurope AT debruinmariel analysisofmarketingauthorisationapplicationsviathemutualrecognitionanddecentralisedproceduresineurope |