Cargando…

“Ride-on” technique and other simple and logical solutions to counter most common complications of silicone implants in augmentation rhinoplasty

Augmentation rhinoplasty can be carried out using a wide range of materials including autologous bone and/or cartilage as well as alloplasts. Use of biologic bone and cartilage grafts results in lower infection rates, but they are associated with long-term resorption and donor-site morbidity. Allopl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Agrawal, Kapil S., Bachhav, Manoj V., Naik, Charudatta S., Gupta, Shikha, Sarda, Anup V., Desai, Vyoma
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4564502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26424982
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-0358.163056
_version_ 1782389444099178496
author Agrawal, Kapil S.
Bachhav, Manoj V.
Naik, Charudatta S.
Gupta, Shikha
Sarda, Anup V.
Desai, Vyoma
author_facet Agrawal, Kapil S.
Bachhav, Manoj V.
Naik, Charudatta S.
Gupta, Shikha
Sarda, Anup V.
Desai, Vyoma
author_sort Agrawal, Kapil S.
collection PubMed
description Augmentation rhinoplasty can be carried out using a wide range of materials including autologous bone and/or cartilage as well as alloplasts. Use of biologic bone and cartilage grafts results in lower infection rates, but they are associated with long-term resorption and donor-site morbidity. Alloplastic materials, in particular silicone, have been associated in literature with extrusion, necrosis of the tip, mobility and deviation or displacement of the implant, immobile nasal tip and infection. However, they have the advantages of being readily available and easy to reshape with no requirement for harvesting autografts. AIM: To overcome these problems associated with silicone implants for which the authors have devised a novel technique, the “rideon technique”. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present study was carried out on 11 patients over a period of 4 years. The authors have devised a simple technique to fix the silicone implant and retain it in place. Restricting the implant to only dorsum avoided common complications related to the silicone implant. RESULTS: The authors have used this technique in 11 patients with encouraging results. Follow-up ranged from 12 months to 36 months during which patients were assessed for implant mobility, implant extrusion and tip necrosis. There was no incidence of above mentioned complications in these patients. CONCLUSION: The “rideon technique” provides excellent stability to silicone implants and restricting the implant only to dorsum not only eliminates chances of tip necrosis and thus implant extrusion but also maintains natural shape, feel and mobility of the tip.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4564502
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45645022015-09-30 “Ride-on” technique and other simple and logical solutions to counter most common complications of silicone implants in augmentation rhinoplasty Agrawal, Kapil S. Bachhav, Manoj V. Naik, Charudatta S. Gupta, Shikha Sarda, Anup V. Desai, Vyoma Indian J Plast Surg Original Article Augmentation rhinoplasty can be carried out using a wide range of materials including autologous bone and/or cartilage as well as alloplasts. Use of biologic bone and cartilage grafts results in lower infection rates, but they are associated with long-term resorption and donor-site morbidity. Alloplastic materials, in particular silicone, have been associated in literature with extrusion, necrosis of the tip, mobility and deviation or displacement of the implant, immobile nasal tip and infection. However, they have the advantages of being readily available and easy to reshape with no requirement for harvesting autografts. AIM: To overcome these problems associated with silicone implants for which the authors have devised a novel technique, the “rideon technique”. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present study was carried out on 11 patients over a period of 4 years. The authors have devised a simple technique to fix the silicone implant and retain it in place. Restricting the implant to only dorsum avoided common complications related to the silicone implant. RESULTS: The authors have used this technique in 11 patients with encouraging results. Follow-up ranged from 12 months to 36 months during which patients were assessed for implant mobility, implant extrusion and tip necrosis. There was no incidence of above mentioned complications in these patients. CONCLUSION: The “rideon technique” provides excellent stability to silicone implants and restricting the implant only to dorsum not only eliminates chances of tip necrosis and thus implant extrusion but also maintains natural shape, feel and mobility of the tip. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4564502/ /pubmed/26424982 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-0358.163056 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Agrawal, Kapil S.
Bachhav, Manoj V.
Naik, Charudatta S.
Gupta, Shikha
Sarda, Anup V.
Desai, Vyoma
“Ride-on” technique and other simple and logical solutions to counter most common complications of silicone implants in augmentation rhinoplasty
title “Ride-on” technique and other simple and logical solutions to counter most common complications of silicone implants in augmentation rhinoplasty
title_full “Ride-on” technique and other simple and logical solutions to counter most common complications of silicone implants in augmentation rhinoplasty
title_fullStr “Ride-on” technique and other simple and logical solutions to counter most common complications of silicone implants in augmentation rhinoplasty
title_full_unstemmed “Ride-on” technique and other simple and logical solutions to counter most common complications of silicone implants in augmentation rhinoplasty
title_short “Ride-on” technique and other simple and logical solutions to counter most common complications of silicone implants in augmentation rhinoplasty
title_sort “ride-on” technique and other simple and logical solutions to counter most common complications of silicone implants in augmentation rhinoplasty
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4564502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26424982
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-0358.163056
work_keys_str_mv AT agrawalkapils rideontechniqueandothersimpleandlogicalsolutionstocountermostcommoncomplicationsofsiliconeimplantsinaugmentationrhinoplasty
AT bachhavmanojv rideontechniqueandothersimpleandlogicalsolutionstocountermostcommoncomplicationsofsiliconeimplantsinaugmentationrhinoplasty
AT naikcharudattas rideontechniqueandothersimpleandlogicalsolutionstocountermostcommoncomplicationsofsiliconeimplantsinaugmentationrhinoplasty
AT guptashikha rideontechniqueandothersimpleandlogicalsolutionstocountermostcommoncomplicationsofsiliconeimplantsinaugmentationrhinoplasty
AT sardaanupv rideontechniqueandothersimpleandlogicalsolutionstocountermostcommoncomplicationsofsiliconeimplantsinaugmentationrhinoplasty
AT desaivyoma rideontechniqueandothersimpleandlogicalsolutionstocountermostcommoncomplicationsofsiliconeimplantsinaugmentationrhinoplasty