Cargando…
Using Magnetic Resonance for Predicting Femoral Strength: Added Value with respect to Bone Densitometry
Background and Purpose. To evaluate the added value of MRI with respect to peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for predicting femoral strength. Material and Methods. Bone mineral density (BMD) of eighteen femur specimens was assessed with pQC...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4564639/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26413544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/801518 |
_version_ | 1782389469612081152 |
---|---|
author | Louis, Olivia Fierens, Yves Strantza, Maria Luypaert, Robert de Mey, Johan Cattrysse, Erik |
author_facet | Louis, Olivia Fierens, Yves Strantza, Maria Luypaert, Robert de Mey, Johan Cattrysse, Erik |
author_sort | Louis, Olivia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and Purpose. To evaluate the added value of MRI with respect to peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for predicting femoral strength. Material and Methods. Bone mineral density (BMD) of eighteen femur specimens was assessed with pQCT, DXA, and MRI (using ultrashort echo times (UTE) and the MicroView software). Subsequently biomechanical testing was performed to assess failure load. Simple and multiple linear regression were used with failure load as the dependent variable. Results. Simple linear regression allowed a prediction of failure load with either pQCT, DXA, or MRI in an r (2) range of 0.41–0.48. Multiple linear regression with pQCT, DXA, and MRI yielded the best prediction (r (2) = 0.68). Conclusions. The accuracy of MRI, using UTE and MicroView software, to predict femoral strength compares well with that of pQCT or DXA. Furthermore, the inclusion of MRI in a multiple-regression model yields the best prediction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4564639 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45646392015-09-27 Using Magnetic Resonance for Predicting Femoral Strength: Added Value with respect to Bone Densitometry Louis, Olivia Fierens, Yves Strantza, Maria Luypaert, Robert de Mey, Johan Cattrysse, Erik Biomed Res Int Research Article Background and Purpose. To evaluate the added value of MRI with respect to peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for predicting femoral strength. Material and Methods. Bone mineral density (BMD) of eighteen femur specimens was assessed with pQCT, DXA, and MRI (using ultrashort echo times (UTE) and the MicroView software). Subsequently biomechanical testing was performed to assess failure load. Simple and multiple linear regression were used with failure load as the dependent variable. Results. Simple linear regression allowed a prediction of failure load with either pQCT, DXA, or MRI in an r (2) range of 0.41–0.48. Multiple linear regression with pQCT, DXA, and MRI yielded the best prediction (r (2) = 0.68). Conclusions. The accuracy of MRI, using UTE and MicroView software, to predict femoral strength compares well with that of pQCT or DXA. Furthermore, the inclusion of MRI in a multiple-regression model yields the best prediction. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4564639/ /pubmed/26413544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/801518 Text en Copyright © 2015 Olivia Louis et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Louis, Olivia Fierens, Yves Strantza, Maria Luypaert, Robert de Mey, Johan Cattrysse, Erik Using Magnetic Resonance for Predicting Femoral Strength: Added Value with respect to Bone Densitometry |
title | Using Magnetic Resonance for Predicting Femoral Strength: Added Value with respect to Bone Densitometry |
title_full | Using Magnetic Resonance for Predicting Femoral Strength: Added Value with respect to Bone Densitometry |
title_fullStr | Using Magnetic Resonance for Predicting Femoral Strength: Added Value with respect to Bone Densitometry |
title_full_unstemmed | Using Magnetic Resonance for Predicting Femoral Strength: Added Value with respect to Bone Densitometry |
title_short | Using Magnetic Resonance for Predicting Femoral Strength: Added Value with respect to Bone Densitometry |
title_sort | using magnetic resonance for predicting femoral strength: added value with respect to bone densitometry |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4564639/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26413544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/801518 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT louisolivia usingmagneticresonanceforpredictingfemoralstrengthaddedvaluewithrespecttobonedensitometry AT fierensyves usingmagneticresonanceforpredictingfemoralstrengthaddedvaluewithrespecttobonedensitometry AT strantzamaria usingmagneticresonanceforpredictingfemoralstrengthaddedvaluewithrespecttobonedensitometry AT luypaertrobert usingmagneticresonanceforpredictingfemoralstrengthaddedvaluewithrespecttobonedensitometry AT demeyjohan usingmagneticresonanceforpredictingfemoralstrengthaddedvaluewithrespecttobonedensitometry AT cattrysseerik usingmagneticresonanceforpredictingfemoralstrengthaddedvaluewithrespecttobonedensitometry |