Cargando…

Using Magnetic Resonance for Predicting Femoral Strength: Added Value with respect to Bone Densitometry

Background and Purpose. To evaluate the added value of MRI with respect to peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for predicting femoral strength. Material and Methods. Bone mineral density (BMD) of eighteen femur specimens was assessed with pQC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Louis, Olivia, Fierens, Yves, Strantza, Maria, Luypaert, Robert, de Mey, Johan, Cattrysse, Erik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4564639/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26413544
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/801518
_version_ 1782389469612081152
author Louis, Olivia
Fierens, Yves
Strantza, Maria
Luypaert, Robert
de Mey, Johan
Cattrysse, Erik
author_facet Louis, Olivia
Fierens, Yves
Strantza, Maria
Luypaert, Robert
de Mey, Johan
Cattrysse, Erik
author_sort Louis, Olivia
collection PubMed
description Background and Purpose. To evaluate the added value of MRI with respect to peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for predicting femoral strength. Material and Methods. Bone mineral density (BMD) of eighteen femur specimens was assessed with pQCT, DXA, and MRI (using ultrashort echo times (UTE) and the MicroView software). Subsequently biomechanical testing was performed to assess failure load. Simple and multiple linear regression were used with failure load as the dependent variable. Results. Simple linear regression allowed a prediction of failure load with either pQCT, DXA, or MRI in an r (2) range of 0.41–0.48. Multiple linear regression with pQCT, DXA, and MRI yielded the best prediction (r (2) = 0.68). Conclusions. The accuracy of MRI, using UTE and MicroView software, to predict femoral strength compares well with that of pQCT or DXA. Furthermore, the inclusion of MRI in a multiple-regression model yields the best prediction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4564639
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45646392015-09-27 Using Magnetic Resonance for Predicting Femoral Strength: Added Value with respect to Bone Densitometry Louis, Olivia Fierens, Yves Strantza, Maria Luypaert, Robert de Mey, Johan Cattrysse, Erik Biomed Res Int Research Article Background and Purpose. To evaluate the added value of MRI with respect to peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for predicting femoral strength. Material and Methods. Bone mineral density (BMD) of eighteen femur specimens was assessed with pQCT, DXA, and MRI (using ultrashort echo times (UTE) and the MicroView software). Subsequently biomechanical testing was performed to assess failure load. Simple and multiple linear regression were used with failure load as the dependent variable. Results. Simple linear regression allowed a prediction of failure load with either pQCT, DXA, or MRI in an r (2) range of 0.41–0.48. Multiple linear regression with pQCT, DXA, and MRI yielded the best prediction (r (2) = 0.68). Conclusions. The accuracy of MRI, using UTE and MicroView software, to predict femoral strength compares well with that of pQCT or DXA. Furthermore, the inclusion of MRI in a multiple-regression model yields the best prediction. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4564639/ /pubmed/26413544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/801518 Text en Copyright © 2015 Olivia Louis et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Louis, Olivia
Fierens, Yves
Strantza, Maria
Luypaert, Robert
de Mey, Johan
Cattrysse, Erik
Using Magnetic Resonance for Predicting Femoral Strength: Added Value with respect to Bone Densitometry
title Using Magnetic Resonance for Predicting Femoral Strength: Added Value with respect to Bone Densitometry
title_full Using Magnetic Resonance for Predicting Femoral Strength: Added Value with respect to Bone Densitometry
title_fullStr Using Magnetic Resonance for Predicting Femoral Strength: Added Value with respect to Bone Densitometry
title_full_unstemmed Using Magnetic Resonance for Predicting Femoral Strength: Added Value with respect to Bone Densitometry
title_short Using Magnetic Resonance for Predicting Femoral Strength: Added Value with respect to Bone Densitometry
title_sort using magnetic resonance for predicting femoral strength: added value with respect to bone densitometry
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4564639/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26413544
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/801518
work_keys_str_mv AT louisolivia usingmagneticresonanceforpredictingfemoralstrengthaddedvaluewithrespecttobonedensitometry
AT fierensyves usingmagneticresonanceforpredictingfemoralstrengthaddedvaluewithrespecttobonedensitometry
AT strantzamaria usingmagneticresonanceforpredictingfemoralstrengthaddedvaluewithrespecttobonedensitometry
AT luypaertrobert usingmagneticresonanceforpredictingfemoralstrengthaddedvaluewithrespecttobonedensitometry
AT demeyjohan usingmagneticresonanceforpredictingfemoralstrengthaddedvaluewithrespecttobonedensitometry
AT cattrysseerik usingmagneticresonanceforpredictingfemoralstrengthaddedvaluewithrespecttobonedensitometry