Cargando…

A survey about methods dedicated to epistasis detection

During the past decade, findings of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) improved our knowledge and understanding of disease genetics. To date, thousands of SNPs have been associated with diseases and other complex traits. Statistical analysis typically looks for association between a phenotype an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Niel, Clément, Sinoquet, Christine, Dina, Christian, Rocheleau, Ghislain
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4564769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26442103
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2015.00285
_version_ 1782389496623398912
author Niel, Clément
Sinoquet, Christine
Dina, Christian
Rocheleau, Ghislain
author_facet Niel, Clément
Sinoquet, Christine
Dina, Christian
Rocheleau, Ghislain
author_sort Niel, Clément
collection PubMed
description During the past decade, findings of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) improved our knowledge and understanding of disease genetics. To date, thousands of SNPs have been associated with diseases and other complex traits. Statistical analysis typically looks for association between a phenotype and a SNP taken individually via single-locus tests. However, geneticists admit this is an oversimplified approach to tackle the complexity of underlying biological mechanisms. Interaction between SNPs, namely epistasis, must be considered. Unfortunately, epistasis detection gives rise to analytic challenges since analyzing every SNP combination is at present impractical at a genome-wide scale. In this review, we will present the main strategies recently proposed to detect epistatic interactions, along with their operating principle. Some of these methods are exhaustive, such as multifactor dimensionality reduction, likelihood ratio-based tests or receiver operating characteristic curve analysis; some are non-exhaustive, such as machine learning techniques (random forests, Bayesian networks) or combinatorial optimization approaches (ant colony optimization, computational evolution system).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4564769
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45647692015-10-05 A survey about methods dedicated to epistasis detection Niel, Clément Sinoquet, Christine Dina, Christian Rocheleau, Ghislain Front Genet Genetics During the past decade, findings of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) improved our knowledge and understanding of disease genetics. To date, thousands of SNPs have been associated with diseases and other complex traits. Statistical analysis typically looks for association between a phenotype and a SNP taken individually via single-locus tests. However, geneticists admit this is an oversimplified approach to tackle the complexity of underlying biological mechanisms. Interaction between SNPs, namely epistasis, must be considered. Unfortunately, epistasis detection gives rise to analytic challenges since analyzing every SNP combination is at present impractical at a genome-wide scale. In this review, we will present the main strategies recently proposed to detect epistatic interactions, along with their operating principle. Some of these methods are exhaustive, such as multifactor dimensionality reduction, likelihood ratio-based tests or receiver operating characteristic curve analysis; some are non-exhaustive, such as machine learning techniques (random forests, Bayesian networks) or combinatorial optimization approaches (ant colony optimization, computational evolution system). Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4564769/ /pubmed/26442103 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2015.00285 Text en Copyright © 2015 Niel, Sinoquet, Dina and Rocheleau. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Genetics
Niel, Clément
Sinoquet, Christine
Dina, Christian
Rocheleau, Ghislain
A survey about methods dedicated to epistasis detection
title A survey about methods dedicated to epistasis detection
title_full A survey about methods dedicated to epistasis detection
title_fullStr A survey about methods dedicated to epistasis detection
title_full_unstemmed A survey about methods dedicated to epistasis detection
title_short A survey about methods dedicated to epistasis detection
title_sort survey about methods dedicated to epistasis detection
topic Genetics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4564769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26442103
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2015.00285
work_keys_str_mv AT nielclement asurveyaboutmethodsdedicatedtoepistasisdetection
AT sinoquetchristine asurveyaboutmethodsdedicatedtoepistasisdetection
AT dinachristian asurveyaboutmethodsdedicatedtoepistasisdetection
AT rocheleaughislain asurveyaboutmethodsdedicatedtoepistasisdetection
AT nielclement surveyaboutmethodsdedicatedtoepistasisdetection
AT sinoquetchristine surveyaboutmethodsdedicatedtoepistasisdetection
AT dinachristian surveyaboutmethodsdedicatedtoepistasisdetection
AT rocheleaughislain surveyaboutmethodsdedicatedtoepistasisdetection