Cargando…
A survey about methods dedicated to epistasis detection
During the past decade, findings of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) improved our knowledge and understanding of disease genetics. To date, thousands of SNPs have been associated with diseases and other complex traits. Statistical analysis typically looks for association between a phenotype an...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4564769/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26442103 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2015.00285 |
_version_ | 1782389496623398912 |
---|---|
author | Niel, Clément Sinoquet, Christine Dina, Christian Rocheleau, Ghislain |
author_facet | Niel, Clément Sinoquet, Christine Dina, Christian Rocheleau, Ghislain |
author_sort | Niel, Clément |
collection | PubMed |
description | During the past decade, findings of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) improved our knowledge and understanding of disease genetics. To date, thousands of SNPs have been associated with diseases and other complex traits. Statistical analysis typically looks for association between a phenotype and a SNP taken individually via single-locus tests. However, geneticists admit this is an oversimplified approach to tackle the complexity of underlying biological mechanisms. Interaction between SNPs, namely epistasis, must be considered. Unfortunately, epistasis detection gives rise to analytic challenges since analyzing every SNP combination is at present impractical at a genome-wide scale. In this review, we will present the main strategies recently proposed to detect epistatic interactions, along with their operating principle. Some of these methods are exhaustive, such as multifactor dimensionality reduction, likelihood ratio-based tests or receiver operating characteristic curve analysis; some are non-exhaustive, such as machine learning techniques (random forests, Bayesian networks) or combinatorial optimization approaches (ant colony optimization, computational evolution system). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4564769 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45647692015-10-05 A survey about methods dedicated to epistasis detection Niel, Clément Sinoquet, Christine Dina, Christian Rocheleau, Ghislain Front Genet Genetics During the past decade, findings of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) improved our knowledge and understanding of disease genetics. To date, thousands of SNPs have been associated with diseases and other complex traits. Statistical analysis typically looks for association between a phenotype and a SNP taken individually via single-locus tests. However, geneticists admit this is an oversimplified approach to tackle the complexity of underlying biological mechanisms. Interaction between SNPs, namely epistasis, must be considered. Unfortunately, epistasis detection gives rise to analytic challenges since analyzing every SNP combination is at present impractical at a genome-wide scale. In this review, we will present the main strategies recently proposed to detect epistatic interactions, along with their operating principle. Some of these methods are exhaustive, such as multifactor dimensionality reduction, likelihood ratio-based tests or receiver operating characteristic curve analysis; some are non-exhaustive, such as machine learning techniques (random forests, Bayesian networks) or combinatorial optimization approaches (ant colony optimization, computational evolution system). Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4564769/ /pubmed/26442103 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2015.00285 Text en Copyright © 2015 Niel, Sinoquet, Dina and Rocheleau. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Genetics Niel, Clément Sinoquet, Christine Dina, Christian Rocheleau, Ghislain A survey about methods dedicated to epistasis detection |
title | A survey about methods dedicated to epistasis detection |
title_full | A survey about methods dedicated to epistasis detection |
title_fullStr | A survey about methods dedicated to epistasis detection |
title_full_unstemmed | A survey about methods dedicated to epistasis detection |
title_short | A survey about methods dedicated to epistasis detection |
title_sort | survey about methods dedicated to epistasis detection |
topic | Genetics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4564769/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26442103 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2015.00285 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nielclement asurveyaboutmethodsdedicatedtoepistasisdetection AT sinoquetchristine asurveyaboutmethodsdedicatedtoepistasisdetection AT dinachristian asurveyaboutmethodsdedicatedtoepistasisdetection AT rocheleaughislain asurveyaboutmethodsdedicatedtoepistasisdetection AT nielclement surveyaboutmethodsdedicatedtoepistasisdetection AT sinoquetchristine surveyaboutmethodsdedicatedtoepistasisdetection AT dinachristian surveyaboutmethodsdedicatedtoepistasisdetection AT rocheleaughislain surveyaboutmethodsdedicatedtoepistasisdetection |