Cargando…

Evaluation of universal newborn hearing screening in South African primary care

Background: Universal Newborn Hearing Screening (UNHC) is the gold standard toward early hearing detection and intervention, hence the importance of its deliberation within the South African context. Aim: To determine the feasibility of screening in low-risk neonates, using Otoacoustic Emissions (OA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khoza-Shangase, Katijah, Harbinson, Shannon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AOSIS OpenJournals 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4564907/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26245605
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v7i1.769
_version_ 1782389517623230464
author Khoza-Shangase, Katijah
Harbinson, Shannon
author_facet Khoza-Shangase, Katijah
Harbinson, Shannon
author_sort Khoza-Shangase, Katijah
collection PubMed
description Background: Universal Newborn Hearing Screening (UNHC) is the gold standard toward early hearing detection and intervention, hence the importance of its deliberation within the South African context. Aim: To determine the feasibility of screening in low-risk neonates, using Otoacoustic Emissions (OAEs), within the Midwife Obstetric Unit (MOU) three-day assessment clinic at a Community Health Centre (CHC), at various test times following birth. Method: Within a quantitative, prospective design, 272 neonates were included. Case history interviews, otoscopic examinations and Distortion Product OAEs (DPOAEs) screening were conducted at two sessions (within six hours and approximately three days after birth). Data were analysed via descriptive statistics. Results: Based on current staffing profile and practice, efficient and comprehensive screening is not successful within hours of birth, but is more so at the MOU three-day assessment clinic. Significantly higher numbers of infants were screened at session 2, with significantly less false-positive results. At session 1, only 38.1% of the neonates were screened, as opposed to more than 100% at session 2. Session 1 yielded an 82.1% rate of false positive findings, a rate that not only has important implications for the emotional well-being of the parents; but also for resource-stricken environments where expenditure has to be accounted for carefully. Conclusion: Current findings highlight the importance of studying methodologies to ensure effective reach for hearing screening within the South African context. These findings argue for UNHS initiatives to include the MOU three-day assessment to ensure that a higher number of neonates are reached and confounding variables such as vernix have been eliminated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4564907
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher AOSIS OpenJournals
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45649072016-02-03 Evaluation of universal newborn hearing screening in South African primary care Khoza-Shangase, Katijah Harbinson, Shannon Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med Original Research Background: Universal Newborn Hearing Screening (UNHC) is the gold standard toward early hearing detection and intervention, hence the importance of its deliberation within the South African context. Aim: To determine the feasibility of screening in low-risk neonates, using Otoacoustic Emissions (OAEs), within the Midwife Obstetric Unit (MOU) three-day assessment clinic at a Community Health Centre (CHC), at various test times following birth. Method: Within a quantitative, prospective design, 272 neonates were included. Case history interviews, otoscopic examinations and Distortion Product OAEs (DPOAEs) screening were conducted at two sessions (within six hours and approximately three days after birth). Data were analysed via descriptive statistics. Results: Based on current staffing profile and practice, efficient and comprehensive screening is not successful within hours of birth, but is more so at the MOU three-day assessment clinic. Significantly higher numbers of infants were screened at session 2, with significantly less false-positive results. At session 1, only 38.1% of the neonates were screened, as opposed to more than 100% at session 2. Session 1 yielded an 82.1% rate of false positive findings, a rate that not only has important implications for the emotional well-being of the parents; but also for resource-stricken environments where expenditure has to be accounted for carefully. Conclusion: Current findings highlight the importance of studying methodologies to ensure effective reach for hearing screening within the South African context. These findings argue for UNHS initiatives to include the MOU three-day assessment to ensure that a higher number of neonates are reached and confounding variables such as vernix have been eliminated. AOSIS OpenJournals 2015-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4564907/ /pubmed/26245605 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v7i1.769 Text en © 2015. The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ AOSIS OpenJournals. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License.
spellingShingle Original Research
Khoza-Shangase, Katijah
Harbinson, Shannon
Evaluation of universal newborn hearing screening in South African primary care
title Evaluation of universal newborn hearing screening in South African primary care
title_full Evaluation of universal newborn hearing screening in South African primary care
title_fullStr Evaluation of universal newborn hearing screening in South African primary care
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of universal newborn hearing screening in South African primary care
title_short Evaluation of universal newborn hearing screening in South African primary care
title_sort evaluation of universal newborn hearing screening in south african primary care
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4564907/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26245605
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v7i1.769
work_keys_str_mv AT khozashangasekatijah evaluationofuniversalnewbornhearingscreeninginsouthafricanprimarycare
AT harbinsonshannon evaluationofuniversalnewbornhearingscreeninginsouthafricanprimarycare