Cargando…

Consequences of waterlogging in cotton and opportunities for mitigation of yield losses

Climatic variability, typified by erratic heavy-rainfall events, causes waterlogging in intensively irrigated crops and is exacerbated under warm temperature regimes on soils with poor internal drainage. Irrigated cotton is often grown in precisely these conditions, exposing it to waterlogging-induc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Najeeb, Ullah, Bange, Michael P., Tan, Daniel K. Y., Atwell, Brian J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4565423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26194168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plv080
_version_ 1782389570886696960
author Najeeb, Ullah
Bange, Michael P.
Tan, Daniel K. Y.
Atwell, Brian J.
author_facet Najeeb, Ullah
Bange, Michael P.
Tan, Daniel K. Y.
Atwell, Brian J.
author_sort Najeeb, Ullah
collection PubMed
description Climatic variability, typified by erratic heavy-rainfall events, causes waterlogging in intensively irrigated crops and is exacerbated under warm temperature regimes on soils with poor internal drainage. Irrigated cotton is often grown in precisely these conditions, exposing it to waterlogging-induced yield losses after substantial summer rainfall. This calls for a deeper understanding of mechanisms of waterlogging tolerance and its relevance to cotton. Hence this review suggests possible causes of waterlogging-induced yield loss in cotton and approaches to improvement of waterlogging tolerance, drawing upon the slight body of published data in cotton and principles from other species. The yield penalty depends on soil type, phenological stage and cumulative period of root exposure to air-filled porosities below 10 %. Events in the soil include O(2) deficiency in the root zone that changes the redox state of nutrients, making them unavailable (e.g. nitrogen) or potentially toxic for plants. Furthermore, root-derived hormones that are transported in the xylem have long been associated with oxygen deficits. These belowground effects (impaired root growth, nutrient uptake and transport, hormonal signalling) affect the shoots, interfering with canopy development, photosynthesis and radiation-use efficiency. Compared with the more waterlogging-tolerant cereals, cotton does not have identified adaptations to waterlogging in the root zone, forming no conspicuous root aerenchyma and having low fermentative activity. We speculate that these factors contribute substantially to the sensitivity of cotton to sustained periods of waterlogging. We discuss the impact of these belowground factors on shoot performance, photosynthesis and yield components. Management practices, i.e. soil aeration, scheduling irrigation and fertilizer application, can reduce waterlogging-induced damage. Limiting ethylene biosynthesis using anti-ethylene agents and down-regulating expression of genes controlling ethylene biosynthesis are strong candidates to minimize yield losses in waterlogged cotton crops. Other key pathways of anoxia tolerance are also cited as potential tools towards waterlogging-tolerant cotton genotypes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4565423
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45654232017-01-06 Consequences of waterlogging in cotton and opportunities for mitigation of yield losses Najeeb, Ullah Bange, Michael P. Tan, Daniel K. Y. Atwell, Brian J. AoB Plants Reviews Climatic variability, typified by erratic heavy-rainfall events, causes waterlogging in intensively irrigated crops and is exacerbated under warm temperature regimes on soils with poor internal drainage. Irrigated cotton is often grown in precisely these conditions, exposing it to waterlogging-induced yield losses after substantial summer rainfall. This calls for a deeper understanding of mechanisms of waterlogging tolerance and its relevance to cotton. Hence this review suggests possible causes of waterlogging-induced yield loss in cotton and approaches to improvement of waterlogging tolerance, drawing upon the slight body of published data in cotton and principles from other species. The yield penalty depends on soil type, phenological stage and cumulative period of root exposure to air-filled porosities below 10 %. Events in the soil include O(2) deficiency in the root zone that changes the redox state of nutrients, making them unavailable (e.g. nitrogen) or potentially toxic for plants. Furthermore, root-derived hormones that are transported in the xylem have long been associated with oxygen deficits. These belowground effects (impaired root growth, nutrient uptake and transport, hormonal signalling) affect the shoots, interfering with canopy development, photosynthesis and radiation-use efficiency. Compared with the more waterlogging-tolerant cereals, cotton does not have identified adaptations to waterlogging in the root zone, forming no conspicuous root aerenchyma and having low fermentative activity. We speculate that these factors contribute substantially to the sensitivity of cotton to sustained periods of waterlogging. We discuss the impact of these belowground factors on shoot performance, photosynthesis and yield components. Management practices, i.e. soil aeration, scheduling irrigation and fertilizer application, can reduce waterlogging-induced damage. Limiting ethylene biosynthesis using anti-ethylene agents and down-regulating expression of genes controlling ethylene biosynthesis are strong candidates to minimize yield losses in waterlogged cotton crops. Other key pathways of anoxia tolerance are also cited as potential tools towards waterlogging-tolerant cotton genotypes. Oxford University Press 2015-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4565423/ /pubmed/26194168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plv080 Text en Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Reviews
Najeeb, Ullah
Bange, Michael P.
Tan, Daniel K. Y.
Atwell, Brian J.
Consequences of waterlogging in cotton and opportunities for mitigation of yield losses
title Consequences of waterlogging in cotton and opportunities for mitigation of yield losses
title_full Consequences of waterlogging in cotton and opportunities for mitigation of yield losses
title_fullStr Consequences of waterlogging in cotton and opportunities for mitigation of yield losses
title_full_unstemmed Consequences of waterlogging in cotton and opportunities for mitigation of yield losses
title_short Consequences of waterlogging in cotton and opportunities for mitigation of yield losses
title_sort consequences of waterlogging in cotton and opportunities for mitigation of yield losses
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4565423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26194168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plv080
work_keys_str_mv AT najeebullah consequencesofwaterloggingincottonandopportunitiesformitigationofyieldlosses
AT bangemichaelp consequencesofwaterloggingincottonandopportunitiesformitigationofyieldlosses
AT tandanielky consequencesofwaterloggingincottonandopportunitiesformitigationofyieldlosses
AT atwellbrianj consequencesofwaterloggingincottonandopportunitiesformitigationofyieldlosses