Cargando…
A Muti-center, Randomized Phase II Study of Oxaliplatin and S-1 versus Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Background: Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) is considered one of the primary chemotherapy regimens for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Oxaliplatin plus S-1 (OS) has also demonstrated significant efficacy in CRC. We performed this randomized phase II study to evaluate the effi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Ivyspring International Publisher
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4565854/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26366218 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.12819 |
_version_ | 1782389633134362624 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Jung Han Zang, Dae Young Chung, Ik-Joo Cho, Sang-Hee Park, Keon Uk Oh, Ho-Suck Lee, Kyung Hee Lee, Bong Hwa Kim, Min-Jeong Park, Choong Kee Han, Boram Kim, Hyeong Su Choi, Dae Ro Song, Hun Ho Jung, Joo Young |
author_facet | Kim, Jung Han Zang, Dae Young Chung, Ik-Joo Cho, Sang-Hee Park, Keon Uk Oh, Ho-Suck Lee, Kyung Hee Lee, Bong Hwa Kim, Min-Jeong Park, Choong Kee Han, Boram Kim, Hyeong Su Choi, Dae Ro Song, Hun Ho Jung, Joo Young |
author_sort | Kim, Jung Han |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) is considered one of the primary chemotherapy regimens for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Oxaliplatin plus S-1 (OS) has also demonstrated significant efficacy in CRC. We performed this randomized phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of XELOX versus OS as first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic CRC. Methods: Patients were assigned randomly to receive either OS or XELOX chemotherapy. Oxaliplatin was administered intravenously to all patients at a dose of 130 mg/m(2) on day 1. Patients received either S-1 (40 mg/m(2)) or capecitabine (1,000 mg/m(2)), twice a day for 2 weeks, followed by a 1-week rest. Results: Forty-two patients were assigned to the OS arm and 44 to the XELOX arm. The overall response rate was 33.3% (95% CI, 18.8-47.2) in the OS arm and 40.9% (95% CI, 25.5-54.4) in the XELOX arm (P = 0.230). The disease control rate was significantly higher in the OS arm than the XELOX arm [92.9% (95% CI, 83.7-100) versus 77.3% (95% CI, 64.5-89.4), P = 0.044]. With a median follow up of 17.9 months, the median progression-free survival was 6.1 months in the OS arm and 7.4 months in the XELOX arm, respectively (P = 0. 599). The median survival time was 18.7 months in the OS arm and 20.1 months in the XELOX arm (P = 0.340). The most common grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity was thrombocytopenia in both arms (19.0% for OS and 28.6% for XELOX). Grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed more frequently in the XELOX arm than the OS arm (16.7% vs. 2.4%, P = 0.026). Conclusion: Both OS and XELOX were effective and well tolerated in patients with metastatic CRC. Our results indicate that the combination of oxaliplatin and S-1 is a possible additional therapeutic strategy for such patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4565854 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Ivyspring International Publisher |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45658542015-09-11 A Muti-center, Randomized Phase II Study of Oxaliplatin and S-1 versus Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Kim, Jung Han Zang, Dae Young Chung, Ik-Joo Cho, Sang-Hee Park, Keon Uk Oh, Ho-Suck Lee, Kyung Hee Lee, Bong Hwa Kim, Min-Jeong Park, Choong Kee Han, Boram Kim, Hyeong Su Choi, Dae Ro Song, Hun Ho Jung, Joo Young J Cancer Research Paper Background: Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) is considered one of the primary chemotherapy regimens for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Oxaliplatin plus S-1 (OS) has also demonstrated significant efficacy in CRC. We performed this randomized phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of XELOX versus OS as first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic CRC. Methods: Patients were assigned randomly to receive either OS or XELOX chemotherapy. Oxaliplatin was administered intravenously to all patients at a dose of 130 mg/m(2) on day 1. Patients received either S-1 (40 mg/m(2)) or capecitabine (1,000 mg/m(2)), twice a day for 2 weeks, followed by a 1-week rest. Results: Forty-two patients were assigned to the OS arm and 44 to the XELOX arm. The overall response rate was 33.3% (95% CI, 18.8-47.2) in the OS arm and 40.9% (95% CI, 25.5-54.4) in the XELOX arm (P = 0.230). The disease control rate was significantly higher in the OS arm than the XELOX arm [92.9% (95% CI, 83.7-100) versus 77.3% (95% CI, 64.5-89.4), P = 0.044]. With a median follow up of 17.9 months, the median progression-free survival was 6.1 months in the OS arm and 7.4 months in the XELOX arm, respectively (P = 0. 599). The median survival time was 18.7 months in the OS arm and 20.1 months in the XELOX arm (P = 0.340). The most common grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity was thrombocytopenia in both arms (19.0% for OS and 28.6% for XELOX). Grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed more frequently in the XELOX arm than the OS arm (16.7% vs. 2.4%, P = 0.026). Conclusion: Both OS and XELOX were effective and well tolerated in patients with metastatic CRC. Our results indicate that the combination of oxaliplatin and S-1 is a possible additional therapeutic strategy for such patients. Ivyspring International Publisher 2015-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4565854/ /pubmed/26366218 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.12819 Text en © 2015 Ivyspring International Publisher. Reproduction is permitted for personal, noncommercial use, provided that the article is in whole, unmodified, and properly cited. See http://ivyspring.com/terms for terms and conditions. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Kim, Jung Han Zang, Dae Young Chung, Ik-Joo Cho, Sang-Hee Park, Keon Uk Oh, Ho-Suck Lee, Kyung Hee Lee, Bong Hwa Kim, Min-Jeong Park, Choong Kee Han, Boram Kim, Hyeong Su Choi, Dae Ro Song, Hun Ho Jung, Joo Young A Muti-center, Randomized Phase II Study of Oxaliplatin and S-1 versus Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer |
title | A Muti-center, Randomized Phase II Study of Oxaliplatin and S-1 versus Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer |
title_full | A Muti-center, Randomized Phase II Study of Oxaliplatin and S-1 versus Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer |
title_fullStr | A Muti-center, Randomized Phase II Study of Oxaliplatin and S-1 versus Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | A Muti-center, Randomized Phase II Study of Oxaliplatin and S-1 versus Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer |
title_short | A Muti-center, Randomized Phase II Study of Oxaliplatin and S-1 versus Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer |
title_sort | muti-center, randomized phase ii study of oxaliplatin and s-1 versus capecitabine and oxaliplatin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4565854/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26366218 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.12819 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimjunghan amuticenterrandomizedphaseiistudyofoxaliplatinands1versuscapecitabineandoxaliplatininpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer AT zangdaeyoung amuticenterrandomizedphaseiistudyofoxaliplatinands1versuscapecitabineandoxaliplatininpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer AT chungikjoo amuticenterrandomizedphaseiistudyofoxaliplatinands1versuscapecitabineandoxaliplatininpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer AT chosanghee amuticenterrandomizedphaseiistudyofoxaliplatinands1versuscapecitabineandoxaliplatininpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer AT parkkeonuk amuticenterrandomizedphaseiistudyofoxaliplatinands1versuscapecitabineandoxaliplatininpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer AT ohhosuck amuticenterrandomizedphaseiistudyofoxaliplatinands1versuscapecitabineandoxaliplatininpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer AT leekyunghee amuticenterrandomizedphaseiistudyofoxaliplatinands1versuscapecitabineandoxaliplatininpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer AT leebonghwa amuticenterrandomizedphaseiistudyofoxaliplatinands1versuscapecitabineandoxaliplatininpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer AT kimminjeong amuticenterrandomizedphaseiistudyofoxaliplatinands1versuscapecitabineandoxaliplatininpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer AT parkchoongkee amuticenterrandomizedphaseiistudyofoxaliplatinands1versuscapecitabineandoxaliplatininpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer AT hanboram amuticenterrandomizedphaseiistudyofoxaliplatinands1versuscapecitabineandoxaliplatininpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer AT kimhyeongsu amuticenterrandomizedphaseiistudyofoxaliplatinands1versuscapecitabineandoxaliplatininpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer AT choidaero amuticenterrandomizedphaseiistudyofoxaliplatinands1versuscapecitabineandoxaliplatininpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer AT songhunho amuticenterrandomizedphaseiistudyofoxaliplatinands1versuscapecitabineandoxaliplatininpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer AT jungjooyoung amuticenterrandomizedphaseiistudyofoxaliplatinands1versuscapecitabineandoxaliplatininpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer AT kimjunghan muticenterrandomizedphaseiistudyofoxaliplatinands1versuscapecitabineandoxaliplatininpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer AT zangdaeyoung muticenterrandomizedphaseiistudyofoxaliplatinands1versuscapecitabineandoxaliplatininpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer AT chungikjoo muticenterrandomizedphaseiistudyofoxaliplatinands1versuscapecitabineandoxaliplatininpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer AT chosanghee muticenterrandomizedphaseiistudyofoxaliplatinands1versuscapecitabineandoxaliplatininpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer AT parkkeonuk muticenterrandomizedphaseiistudyofoxaliplatinands1versuscapecitabineandoxaliplatininpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer AT ohhosuck muticenterrandomizedphaseiistudyofoxaliplatinands1versuscapecitabineandoxaliplatininpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer AT leekyunghee muticenterrandomizedphaseiistudyofoxaliplatinands1versuscapecitabineandoxaliplatininpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer AT leebonghwa muticenterrandomizedphaseiistudyofoxaliplatinands1versuscapecitabineandoxaliplatininpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer AT kimminjeong muticenterrandomizedphaseiistudyofoxaliplatinands1versuscapecitabineandoxaliplatininpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer AT parkchoongkee muticenterrandomizedphaseiistudyofoxaliplatinands1versuscapecitabineandoxaliplatininpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer AT hanboram muticenterrandomizedphaseiistudyofoxaliplatinands1versuscapecitabineandoxaliplatininpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer AT kimhyeongsu muticenterrandomizedphaseiistudyofoxaliplatinands1versuscapecitabineandoxaliplatininpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer AT choidaero muticenterrandomizedphaseiistudyofoxaliplatinands1versuscapecitabineandoxaliplatininpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer AT songhunho muticenterrandomizedphaseiistudyofoxaliplatinands1versuscapecitabineandoxaliplatininpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer AT jungjooyoung muticenterrandomizedphaseiistudyofoxaliplatinands1versuscapecitabineandoxaliplatininpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer |