Cargando…
Pathological upgrading in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance: Does prostate-specific antigen density matter?
PURPOSE: To evaluate prospectively the role of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density in predicting Gleason score upgrading in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance (T1/T2, biopsy Gleason score≤6, PSA≤10 ng/mL, and ≤2 positive biopsy cores). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between Januar...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Urological Association
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4565896/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26366274 http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2015.56.9.624 |
_version_ | 1782389642663821312 |
---|---|
author | Jin, Byung-Soo Kang, Seok-Hyun Kim, Duk-Yoon Oh, Hoon-Gyu Kim, Chun-Il Moon, Gi-Hak Kwon, Tae-Gyun Park, Jae-Shin |
author_facet | Jin, Byung-Soo Kang, Seok-Hyun Kim, Duk-Yoon Oh, Hoon-Gyu Kim, Chun-Il Moon, Gi-Hak Kwon, Tae-Gyun Park, Jae-Shin |
author_sort | Jin, Byung-Soo |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To evaluate prospectively the role of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density in predicting Gleason score upgrading in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance (T1/T2, biopsy Gleason score≤6, PSA≤10 ng/mL, and ≤2 positive biopsy cores). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2010 and November 2013, among patients who underwent greater than 10-core transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy, 60 patients eligible for active surveillance underwent radical prostatectomy. By use of the modified Gleason criteria, the tumor grade of the surgical specimens was examined and compared with the biopsy results. RESULTS: Tumor upgrading occurred in 24 patients (40.0%). Extracapsular disease and positive surgical margins were found in 6 patients (10.0%) and 8 patients (17.30%), respectively. A statistically significant correlation between PSA density and postoperative upgrading was found (p=0.030); this was in contrast with the other studied parameters, which failed to reach significance, including PSA, prostate volume, number of biopsy cores, and number of positive cores. Tumor upgrading was also highly associated with extracapsular cancer extension (p=0.000). The estimated optimal cutoff value of PSA density was 0.13 ng/mL(2), obtained by receiver operating characteristic analysis (area under the curve=0.66; p=0.020; 95% confidence interval, 0.53-0.78). CONCLUSIONS: PSA density is a strong predictor of Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy in patients eligible for active surveillance. Because tumor upgrading increases the potential for postoperative pathological adverse findings and prognosis, PSA density should be considered when treating and consulting patients eligible for active surveillance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4565896 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | The Korean Urological Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45658962015-09-11 Pathological upgrading in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance: Does prostate-specific antigen density matter? Jin, Byung-Soo Kang, Seok-Hyun Kim, Duk-Yoon Oh, Hoon-Gyu Kim, Chun-Il Moon, Gi-Hak Kwon, Tae-Gyun Park, Jae-Shin Korean J Urol Original Article PURPOSE: To evaluate prospectively the role of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density in predicting Gleason score upgrading in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance (T1/T2, biopsy Gleason score≤6, PSA≤10 ng/mL, and ≤2 positive biopsy cores). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2010 and November 2013, among patients who underwent greater than 10-core transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy, 60 patients eligible for active surveillance underwent radical prostatectomy. By use of the modified Gleason criteria, the tumor grade of the surgical specimens was examined and compared with the biopsy results. RESULTS: Tumor upgrading occurred in 24 patients (40.0%). Extracapsular disease and positive surgical margins were found in 6 patients (10.0%) and 8 patients (17.30%), respectively. A statistically significant correlation between PSA density and postoperative upgrading was found (p=0.030); this was in contrast with the other studied parameters, which failed to reach significance, including PSA, prostate volume, number of biopsy cores, and number of positive cores. Tumor upgrading was also highly associated with extracapsular cancer extension (p=0.000). The estimated optimal cutoff value of PSA density was 0.13 ng/mL(2), obtained by receiver operating characteristic analysis (area under the curve=0.66; p=0.020; 95% confidence interval, 0.53-0.78). CONCLUSIONS: PSA density is a strong predictor of Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy in patients eligible for active surveillance. Because tumor upgrading increases the potential for postoperative pathological adverse findings and prognosis, PSA density should be considered when treating and consulting patients eligible for active surveillance. The Korean Urological Association 2015-09 2015-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4565896/ /pubmed/26366274 http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2015.56.9.624 Text en © The Korean Urological Association, 2015 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Jin, Byung-Soo Kang, Seok-Hyun Kim, Duk-Yoon Oh, Hoon-Gyu Kim, Chun-Il Moon, Gi-Hak Kwon, Tae-Gyun Park, Jae-Shin Pathological upgrading in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance: Does prostate-specific antigen density matter? |
title | Pathological upgrading in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance: Does prostate-specific antigen density matter? |
title_full | Pathological upgrading in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance: Does prostate-specific antigen density matter? |
title_fullStr | Pathological upgrading in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance: Does prostate-specific antigen density matter? |
title_full_unstemmed | Pathological upgrading in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance: Does prostate-specific antigen density matter? |
title_short | Pathological upgrading in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance: Does prostate-specific antigen density matter? |
title_sort | pathological upgrading in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance: does prostate-specific antigen density matter? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4565896/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26366274 http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2015.56.9.624 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jinbyungsoo pathologicalupgradinginprostatecancerpatientseligibleforactivesurveillancedoesprostatespecificantigendensitymatter AT kangseokhyun pathologicalupgradinginprostatecancerpatientseligibleforactivesurveillancedoesprostatespecificantigendensitymatter AT kimdukyoon pathologicalupgradinginprostatecancerpatientseligibleforactivesurveillancedoesprostatespecificantigendensitymatter AT ohhoongyu pathologicalupgradinginprostatecancerpatientseligibleforactivesurveillancedoesprostatespecificantigendensitymatter AT kimchunil pathologicalupgradinginprostatecancerpatientseligibleforactivesurveillancedoesprostatespecificantigendensitymatter AT moongihak pathologicalupgradinginprostatecancerpatientseligibleforactivesurveillancedoesprostatespecificantigendensitymatter AT kwontaegyun pathologicalupgradinginprostatecancerpatientseligibleforactivesurveillancedoesprostatespecificantigendensitymatter AT parkjaeshin pathologicalupgradinginprostatecancerpatientseligibleforactivesurveillancedoesprostatespecificantigendensitymatter |