Cargando…

Pathological upgrading in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance: Does prostate-specific antigen density matter?

PURPOSE: To evaluate prospectively the role of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density in predicting Gleason score upgrading in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance (T1/T2, biopsy Gleason score≤6, PSA≤10 ng/mL, and ≤2 positive biopsy cores). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between Januar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jin, Byung-Soo, Kang, Seok-Hyun, Kim, Duk-Yoon, Oh, Hoon-Gyu, Kim, Chun-Il, Moon, Gi-Hak, Kwon, Tae-Gyun, Park, Jae-Shin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Urological Association 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4565896/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26366274
http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2015.56.9.624
_version_ 1782389642663821312
author Jin, Byung-Soo
Kang, Seok-Hyun
Kim, Duk-Yoon
Oh, Hoon-Gyu
Kim, Chun-Il
Moon, Gi-Hak
Kwon, Tae-Gyun
Park, Jae-Shin
author_facet Jin, Byung-Soo
Kang, Seok-Hyun
Kim, Duk-Yoon
Oh, Hoon-Gyu
Kim, Chun-Il
Moon, Gi-Hak
Kwon, Tae-Gyun
Park, Jae-Shin
author_sort Jin, Byung-Soo
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate prospectively the role of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density in predicting Gleason score upgrading in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance (T1/T2, biopsy Gleason score≤6, PSA≤10 ng/mL, and ≤2 positive biopsy cores). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2010 and November 2013, among patients who underwent greater than 10-core transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy, 60 patients eligible for active surveillance underwent radical prostatectomy. By use of the modified Gleason criteria, the tumor grade of the surgical specimens was examined and compared with the biopsy results. RESULTS: Tumor upgrading occurred in 24 patients (40.0%). Extracapsular disease and positive surgical margins were found in 6 patients (10.0%) and 8 patients (17.30%), respectively. A statistically significant correlation between PSA density and postoperative upgrading was found (p=0.030); this was in contrast with the other studied parameters, which failed to reach significance, including PSA, prostate volume, number of biopsy cores, and number of positive cores. Tumor upgrading was also highly associated with extracapsular cancer extension (p=0.000). The estimated optimal cutoff value of PSA density was 0.13 ng/mL(2), obtained by receiver operating characteristic analysis (area under the curve=0.66; p=0.020; 95% confidence interval, 0.53-0.78). CONCLUSIONS: PSA density is a strong predictor of Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy in patients eligible for active surveillance. Because tumor upgrading increases the potential for postoperative pathological adverse findings and prognosis, PSA density should be considered when treating and consulting patients eligible for active surveillance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4565896
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher The Korean Urological Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45658962015-09-11 Pathological upgrading in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance: Does prostate-specific antigen density matter? Jin, Byung-Soo Kang, Seok-Hyun Kim, Duk-Yoon Oh, Hoon-Gyu Kim, Chun-Il Moon, Gi-Hak Kwon, Tae-Gyun Park, Jae-Shin Korean J Urol Original Article PURPOSE: To evaluate prospectively the role of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density in predicting Gleason score upgrading in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance (T1/T2, biopsy Gleason score≤6, PSA≤10 ng/mL, and ≤2 positive biopsy cores). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2010 and November 2013, among patients who underwent greater than 10-core transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy, 60 patients eligible for active surveillance underwent radical prostatectomy. By use of the modified Gleason criteria, the tumor grade of the surgical specimens was examined and compared with the biopsy results. RESULTS: Tumor upgrading occurred in 24 patients (40.0%). Extracapsular disease and positive surgical margins were found in 6 patients (10.0%) and 8 patients (17.30%), respectively. A statistically significant correlation between PSA density and postoperative upgrading was found (p=0.030); this was in contrast with the other studied parameters, which failed to reach significance, including PSA, prostate volume, number of biopsy cores, and number of positive cores. Tumor upgrading was also highly associated with extracapsular cancer extension (p=0.000). The estimated optimal cutoff value of PSA density was 0.13 ng/mL(2), obtained by receiver operating characteristic analysis (area under the curve=0.66; p=0.020; 95% confidence interval, 0.53-0.78). CONCLUSIONS: PSA density is a strong predictor of Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy in patients eligible for active surveillance. Because tumor upgrading increases the potential for postoperative pathological adverse findings and prognosis, PSA density should be considered when treating and consulting patients eligible for active surveillance. The Korean Urological Association 2015-09 2015-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4565896/ /pubmed/26366274 http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2015.56.9.624 Text en © The Korean Urological Association, 2015 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Jin, Byung-Soo
Kang, Seok-Hyun
Kim, Duk-Yoon
Oh, Hoon-Gyu
Kim, Chun-Il
Moon, Gi-Hak
Kwon, Tae-Gyun
Park, Jae-Shin
Pathological upgrading in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance: Does prostate-specific antigen density matter?
title Pathological upgrading in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance: Does prostate-specific antigen density matter?
title_full Pathological upgrading in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance: Does prostate-specific antigen density matter?
title_fullStr Pathological upgrading in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance: Does prostate-specific antigen density matter?
title_full_unstemmed Pathological upgrading in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance: Does prostate-specific antigen density matter?
title_short Pathological upgrading in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance: Does prostate-specific antigen density matter?
title_sort pathological upgrading in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance: does prostate-specific antigen density matter?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4565896/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26366274
http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2015.56.9.624
work_keys_str_mv AT jinbyungsoo pathologicalupgradinginprostatecancerpatientseligibleforactivesurveillancedoesprostatespecificantigendensitymatter
AT kangseokhyun pathologicalupgradinginprostatecancerpatientseligibleforactivesurveillancedoesprostatespecificantigendensitymatter
AT kimdukyoon pathologicalupgradinginprostatecancerpatientseligibleforactivesurveillancedoesprostatespecificantigendensitymatter
AT ohhoongyu pathologicalupgradinginprostatecancerpatientseligibleforactivesurveillancedoesprostatespecificantigendensitymatter
AT kimchunil pathologicalupgradinginprostatecancerpatientseligibleforactivesurveillancedoesprostatespecificantigendensitymatter
AT moongihak pathologicalupgradinginprostatecancerpatientseligibleforactivesurveillancedoesprostatespecificantigendensitymatter
AT kwontaegyun pathologicalupgradinginprostatecancerpatientseligibleforactivesurveillancedoesprostatespecificantigendensitymatter
AT parkjaeshin pathologicalupgradinginprostatecancerpatientseligibleforactivesurveillancedoesprostatespecificantigendensitymatter