Cargando…

Medical practitioners' reactions towards family medicine as a speciality in South Africa

BACKGROUND: Family physicians are trained to treat a wide range of diseases, treatment being centred on the patient, family and community irrespective of age, gender, or ethnic or racial background. To deal with inequalities in health care, the South African government introduced the concept of a di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Naidoo, Cyril, Esterhuizen, Tonya, Gathiram, Prem
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AOSIS OpenJournals 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4565935/
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v1i1.11
_version_ 1782389651558891520
author Naidoo, Cyril
Esterhuizen, Tonya
Gathiram, Prem
author_facet Naidoo, Cyril
Esterhuizen, Tonya
Gathiram, Prem
author_sort Naidoo, Cyril
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Family physicians are trained to treat a wide range of diseases, treatment being centred on the patient, family and community irrespective of age, gender, or ethnic or racial background. To deal with inequalities in health care, the South African government introduced the concept of a district health system in 1997. It was only in August 2007, however, that family medicine was legislated as a speciality. This study was undertaken prior to the enactment of this legislation. METHOD: A descriptive quantitative study using a self-administered questionnaire was undertaken. A convenience sampling technique was used (N = 60) to assess the reactions of medical practitioners towards the impending legislation. RESULTS: Overall, 60% of the sample was in favour of the legislation. There were no significant differences between those working in the private and public sectors or between generalists and specialists. With regard to those not in favour of the legislation compared to those in favour of the legislation, a significantly increased number answered the following statements in the affirmative: (i) ‘I already carry out the functions of a family physician’ (p = 0.001), (ii) ‘They [specialist family physicians] will not be as qualified as specialists in other categories’ (p = 0.005), (iii) ‘It will have a negative impact on general practice’ (p < 0.001), (iv) ‘It will increase competitiveness’ (p = 0.021), (v) ‘It will not have any effect on patient care’ (p = 0.010) and (vi) ‘There is no need for such a speciality’ (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: We concluded that the majority were in favour of the legislation being implemented.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4565935
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher AOSIS OpenJournals
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45659352016-02-03 Medical practitioners' reactions towards family medicine as a speciality in South Africa Naidoo, Cyril Esterhuizen, Tonya Gathiram, Prem Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Family physicians are trained to treat a wide range of diseases, treatment being centred on the patient, family and community irrespective of age, gender, or ethnic or racial background. To deal with inequalities in health care, the South African government introduced the concept of a district health system in 1997. It was only in August 2007, however, that family medicine was legislated as a speciality. This study was undertaken prior to the enactment of this legislation. METHOD: A descriptive quantitative study using a self-administered questionnaire was undertaken. A convenience sampling technique was used (N = 60) to assess the reactions of medical practitioners towards the impending legislation. RESULTS: Overall, 60% of the sample was in favour of the legislation. There were no significant differences between those working in the private and public sectors or between generalists and specialists. With regard to those not in favour of the legislation compared to those in favour of the legislation, a significantly increased number answered the following statements in the affirmative: (i) ‘I already carry out the functions of a family physician’ (p = 0.001), (ii) ‘They [specialist family physicians] will not be as qualified as specialists in other categories’ (p = 0.005), (iii) ‘It will have a negative impact on general practice’ (p < 0.001), (iv) ‘It will increase competitiveness’ (p = 0.021), (v) ‘It will not have any effect on patient care’ (p = 0.010) and (vi) ‘There is no need for such a speciality’ (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: We concluded that the majority were in favour of the legislation being implemented. AOSIS OpenJournals 2009-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4565935/ http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v1i1.11 Text en © 2009. The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ AOSIS OpenJournals. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License.
spellingShingle Original Research
Naidoo, Cyril
Esterhuizen, Tonya
Gathiram, Prem
Medical practitioners' reactions towards family medicine as a speciality in South Africa
title Medical practitioners' reactions towards family medicine as a speciality in South Africa
title_full Medical practitioners' reactions towards family medicine as a speciality in South Africa
title_fullStr Medical practitioners' reactions towards family medicine as a speciality in South Africa
title_full_unstemmed Medical practitioners' reactions towards family medicine as a speciality in South Africa
title_short Medical practitioners' reactions towards family medicine as a speciality in South Africa
title_sort medical practitioners' reactions towards family medicine as a speciality in south africa
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4565935/
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v1i1.11
work_keys_str_mv AT naidoocyril medicalpractitionersreactionstowardsfamilymedicineasaspecialityinsouthafrica
AT esterhuizentonya medicalpractitionersreactionstowardsfamilymedicineasaspecialityinsouthafrica
AT gathiramprem medicalpractitionersreactionstowardsfamilymedicineasaspecialityinsouthafrica