Cargando…

Human resources for primary health care in sub-Saharan Africa: progress or stagnation?

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization defines a “critical shortage” of health workers as being fewer than 2.28 health workers per 1000 population and failing to attain 80% coverage for deliveries by skilled birth attendants. We aimed to quantify the number of health workers in five African count...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Willcox, Merlin L, Peersman, Wim, Daou, Pierre, Diakité, Chiaka, Bajunirwe, Francis, Mubangizi, Vincent, Mahmoud, Eman Hassan, Moosa, Shabir, Phaladze, Nthabiseng, Nkomazana, Oathokwa, Khogali, Mustafa, Diallo, Drissa, De Maeseneer, Jan, Mant, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4566492/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26358250
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12960-015-0073-8
_version_ 1782389718388834304
author Willcox, Merlin L
Peersman, Wim
Daou, Pierre
Diakité, Chiaka
Bajunirwe, Francis
Mubangizi, Vincent
Mahmoud, Eman Hassan
Moosa, Shabir
Phaladze, Nthabiseng
Nkomazana, Oathokwa
Khogali, Mustafa
Diallo, Drissa
De Maeseneer, Jan
Mant, David
author_facet Willcox, Merlin L
Peersman, Wim
Daou, Pierre
Diakité, Chiaka
Bajunirwe, Francis
Mubangizi, Vincent
Mahmoud, Eman Hassan
Moosa, Shabir
Phaladze, Nthabiseng
Nkomazana, Oathokwa
Khogali, Mustafa
Diallo, Drissa
De Maeseneer, Jan
Mant, David
author_sort Willcox, Merlin L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization defines a “critical shortage” of health workers as being fewer than 2.28 health workers per 1000 population and failing to attain 80% coverage for deliveries by skilled birth attendants. We aimed to quantify the number of health workers in five African countries and the proportion of these currently working in primary health care facilities, to compare this to estimates of numbers needed and to assess how the situation has changed in recent years. METHODS: This study is a review of published and unpublished “grey” literature on human resources for health in five disparate countries: Mali, Sudan, Uganda, Botswana and South Africa. RESULTS: Health worker density has increased steadily since 2000 in South Africa and Botswana which already meet WHO targets but has not significantly increased since 2004 in Sudan, Mali and Uganda which have a critical shortage of health workers. In all five countries, a minority of doctors, nurses and midwives are working in primary health care, and shortages of qualified staff are greatest in rural areas. In Uganda, shortages are greater in primary health care settings than at higher levels. In Mali, few community health centres have a midwife or a doctor. Even South Africa has a shortage of doctors in primary health care in poorer districts. Although most countries recognize village health workers, traditional healers and traditional birth attendants, there are insufficient data on their numbers. CONCLUSION: There is an “inverse primary health care law” in the countries studied: staffing is inversely related to poverty and level of need, and health worker density is not increasing in the lowest income countries. Unless there is money to recruit and retain staff in these areas, training programmes will not improve health worker density because the trained staff will simply leave to work elsewhere. Information systems need to be improved in a way that informs policy on the health workforce. It may be possible to use existing resources more cost-effectively by involving skilled staff to supervise and support lower level health care workers who currently provide the front line of primary health care in most of Africa.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4566492
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45664922015-09-12 Human resources for primary health care in sub-Saharan Africa: progress or stagnation? Willcox, Merlin L Peersman, Wim Daou, Pierre Diakité, Chiaka Bajunirwe, Francis Mubangizi, Vincent Mahmoud, Eman Hassan Moosa, Shabir Phaladze, Nthabiseng Nkomazana, Oathokwa Khogali, Mustafa Diallo, Drissa De Maeseneer, Jan Mant, David Hum Resour Health Review BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization defines a “critical shortage” of health workers as being fewer than 2.28 health workers per 1000 population and failing to attain 80% coverage for deliveries by skilled birth attendants. We aimed to quantify the number of health workers in five African countries and the proportion of these currently working in primary health care facilities, to compare this to estimates of numbers needed and to assess how the situation has changed in recent years. METHODS: This study is a review of published and unpublished “grey” literature on human resources for health in five disparate countries: Mali, Sudan, Uganda, Botswana and South Africa. RESULTS: Health worker density has increased steadily since 2000 in South Africa and Botswana which already meet WHO targets but has not significantly increased since 2004 in Sudan, Mali and Uganda which have a critical shortage of health workers. In all five countries, a minority of doctors, nurses and midwives are working in primary health care, and shortages of qualified staff are greatest in rural areas. In Uganda, shortages are greater in primary health care settings than at higher levels. In Mali, few community health centres have a midwife or a doctor. Even South Africa has a shortage of doctors in primary health care in poorer districts. Although most countries recognize village health workers, traditional healers and traditional birth attendants, there are insufficient data on their numbers. CONCLUSION: There is an “inverse primary health care law” in the countries studied: staffing is inversely related to poverty and level of need, and health worker density is not increasing in the lowest income countries. Unless there is money to recruit and retain staff in these areas, training programmes will not improve health worker density because the trained staff will simply leave to work elsewhere. Information systems need to be improved in a way that informs policy on the health workforce. It may be possible to use existing resources more cost-effectively by involving skilled staff to supervise and support lower level health care workers who currently provide the front line of primary health care in most of Africa. BioMed Central 2015-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4566492/ /pubmed/26358250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12960-015-0073-8 Text en © Willcox et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Willcox, Merlin L
Peersman, Wim
Daou, Pierre
Diakité, Chiaka
Bajunirwe, Francis
Mubangizi, Vincent
Mahmoud, Eman Hassan
Moosa, Shabir
Phaladze, Nthabiseng
Nkomazana, Oathokwa
Khogali, Mustafa
Diallo, Drissa
De Maeseneer, Jan
Mant, David
Human resources for primary health care in sub-Saharan Africa: progress or stagnation?
title Human resources for primary health care in sub-Saharan Africa: progress or stagnation?
title_full Human resources for primary health care in sub-Saharan Africa: progress or stagnation?
title_fullStr Human resources for primary health care in sub-Saharan Africa: progress or stagnation?
title_full_unstemmed Human resources for primary health care in sub-Saharan Africa: progress or stagnation?
title_short Human resources for primary health care in sub-Saharan Africa: progress or stagnation?
title_sort human resources for primary health care in sub-saharan africa: progress or stagnation?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4566492/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26358250
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12960-015-0073-8
work_keys_str_mv AT willcoxmerlinl humanresourcesforprimaryhealthcareinsubsaharanafricaprogressorstagnation
AT peersmanwim humanresourcesforprimaryhealthcareinsubsaharanafricaprogressorstagnation
AT daoupierre humanresourcesforprimaryhealthcareinsubsaharanafricaprogressorstagnation
AT diakitechiaka humanresourcesforprimaryhealthcareinsubsaharanafricaprogressorstagnation
AT bajunirwefrancis humanresourcesforprimaryhealthcareinsubsaharanafricaprogressorstagnation
AT mubangizivincent humanresourcesforprimaryhealthcareinsubsaharanafricaprogressorstagnation
AT mahmoudemanhassan humanresourcesforprimaryhealthcareinsubsaharanafricaprogressorstagnation
AT moosashabir humanresourcesforprimaryhealthcareinsubsaharanafricaprogressorstagnation
AT phaladzenthabiseng humanresourcesforprimaryhealthcareinsubsaharanafricaprogressorstagnation
AT nkomazanaoathokwa humanresourcesforprimaryhealthcareinsubsaharanafricaprogressorstagnation
AT khogalimustafa humanresourcesforprimaryhealthcareinsubsaharanafricaprogressorstagnation
AT diallodrissa humanresourcesforprimaryhealthcareinsubsaharanafricaprogressorstagnation
AT demaeseneerjan humanresourcesforprimaryhealthcareinsubsaharanafricaprogressorstagnation
AT mantdavid humanresourcesforprimaryhealthcareinsubsaharanafricaprogressorstagnation