Cargando…

Defining the methodological challenges and opportunities for an effective science of sociotechnical systems and safety

An important part of the application of sociotechnical systems theory (STS) is the development of methods, tools and techniques to assess human factors and ergonomics workplace requirements. We focus in this paper on describing and evaluating current STS methods for workplace safety, as well as outl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Waterson, Patrick, Robertson, Michelle M., Cooke, Nancy J., Militello, Laura, Roth, Emilie, Stanton, Neville A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4566874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25832121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2015.1015622
_version_ 1782389738862280704
author Waterson, Patrick
Robertson, Michelle M.
Cooke, Nancy J.
Militello, Laura
Roth, Emilie
Stanton, Neville A.
author_facet Waterson, Patrick
Robertson, Michelle M.
Cooke, Nancy J.
Militello, Laura
Roth, Emilie
Stanton, Neville A.
author_sort Waterson, Patrick
collection PubMed
description An important part of the application of sociotechnical systems theory (STS) is the development of methods, tools and techniques to assess human factors and ergonomics workplace requirements. We focus in this paper on describing and evaluating current STS methods for workplace safety, as well as outlining a set of six case studies covering the application of these methods to a range of safety contexts. We also describe an evaluation of the methods in terms of ratings of their ability to address a set of theoretical and practical questions (e.g. the degree to which methods capture static/dynamic aspects of tasks and interactions between system levels). The outcomes from the evaluation highlight a set of gaps relating to the coverage and applicability of current methods for STS and safety (e.g. coverage of external influences on system functioning; method usability). The final sections of the paper describe a set of future challenges, as well as some practical suggestions for tackling these. Practitioner Summary: We provide an up-to-date review of STS methods, a set of case studies illustrating their use and an evaluation of their strengths and weaknesses. The paper concludes with a ‘roadmap’ for future work.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4566874
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45668742015-09-29 Defining the methodological challenges and opportunities for an effective science of sociotechnical systems and safety Waterson, Patrick Robertson, Michelle M. Cooke, Nancy J. Militello, Laura Roth, Emilie Stanton, Neville A. Ergonomics Articles An important part of the application of sociotechnical systems theory (STS) is the development of methods, tools and techniques to assess human factors and ergonomics workplace requirements. We focus in this paper on describing and evaluating current STS methods for workplace safety, as well as outlining a set of six case studies covering the application of these methods to a range of safety contexts. We also describe an evaluation of the methods in terms of ratings of their ability to address a set of theoretical and practical questions (e.g. the degree to which methods capture static/dynamic aspects of tasks and interactions between system levels). The outcomes from the evaluation highlight a set of gaps relating to the coverage and applicability of current methods for STS and safety (e.g. coverage of external influences on system functioning; method usability). The final sections of the paper describe a set of future challenges, as well as some practical suggestions for tackling these. Practitioner Summary: We provide an up-to-date review of STS methods, a set of case studies illustrating their use and an evaluation of their strengths and weaknesses. The paper concludes with a ‘roadmap’ for future work. Taylor & Francis 2015-04-03 2015-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4566874/ /pubmed/25832121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2015.1015622 Text en © 2015 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles
Waterson, Patrick
Robertson, Michelle M.
Cooke, Nancy J.
Militello, Laura
Roth, Emilie
Stanton, Neville A.
Defining the methodological challenges and opportunities for an effective science of sociotechnical systems and safety
title Defining the methodological challenges and opportunities for an effective science of sociotechnical systems and safety
title_full Defining the methodological challenges and opportunities for an effective science of sociotechnical systems and safety
title_fullStr Defining the methodological challenges and opportunities for an effective science of sociotechnical systems and safety
title_full_unstemmed Defining the methodological challenges and opportunities for an effective science of sociotechnical systems and safety
title_short Defining the methodological challenges and opportunities for an effective science of sociotechnical systems and safety
title_sort defining the methodological challenges and opportunities for an effective science of sociotechnical systems and safety
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4566874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25832121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2015.1015622
work_keys_str_mv AT watersonpatrick definingthemethodologicalchallengesandopportunitiesforaneffectivescienceofsociotechnicalsystemsandsafety
AT robertsonmichellem definingthemethodologicalchallengesandopportunitiesforaneffectivescienceofsociotechnicalsystemsandsafety
AT cookenancyj definingthemethodologicalchallengesandopportunitiesforaneffectivescienceofsociotechnicalsystemsandsafety
AT militellolaura definingthemethodologicalchallengesandopportunitiesforaneffectivescienceofsociotechnicalsystemsandsafety
AT rothemilie definingthemethodologicalchallengesandopportunitiesforaneffectivescienceofsociotechnicalsystemsandsafety
AT stantonnevillea definingthemethodologicalchallengesandopportunitiesforaneffectivescienceofsociotechnicalsystemsandsafety