Cargando…
Defining the methodological challenges and opportunities for an effective science of sociotechnical systems and safety
An important part of the application of sociotechnical systems theory (STS) is the development of methods, tools and techniques to assess human factors and ergonomics workplace requirements. We focus in this paper on describing and evaluating current STS methods for workplace safety, as well as outl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4566874/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25832121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2015.1015622 |
_version_ | 1782389738862280704 |
---|---|
author | Waterson, Patrick Robertson, Michelle M. Cooke, Nancy J. Militello, Laura Roth, Emilie Stanton, Neville A. |
author_facet | Waterson, Patrick Robertson, Michelle M. Cooke, Nancy J. Militello, Laura Roth, Emilie Stanton, Neville A. |
author_sort | Waterson, Patrick |
collection | PubMed |
description | An important part of the application of sociotechnical systems theory (STS) is the development of methods, tools and techniques to assess human factors and ergonomics workplace requirements. We focus in this paper on describing and evaluating current STS methods for workplace safety, as well as outlining a set of six case studies covering the application of these methods to a range of safety contexts. We also describe an evaluation of the methods in terms of ratings of their ability to address a set of theoretical and practical questions (e.g. the degree to which methods capture static/dynamic aspects of tasks and interactions between system levels). The outcomes from the evaluation highlight a set of gaps relating to the coverage and applicability of current methods for STS and safety (e.g. coverage of external influences on system functioning; method usability). The final sections of the paper describe a set of future challenges, as well as some practical suggestions for tackling these. Practitioner Summary: We provide an up-to-date review of STS methods, a set of case studies illustrating their use and an evaluation of their strengths and weaknesses. The paper concludes with a ‘roadmap’ for future work. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4566874 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45668742015-09-29 Defining the methodological challenges and opportunities for an effective science of sociotechnical systems and safety Waterson, Patrick Robertson, Michelle M. Cooke, Nancy J. Militello, Laura Roth, Emilie Stanton, Neville A. Ergonomics Articles An important part of the application of sociotechnical systems theory (STS) is the development of methods, tools and techniques to assess human factors and ergonomics workplace requirements. We focus in this paper on describing and evaluating current STS methods for workplace safety, as well as outlining a set of six case studies covering the application of these methods to a range of safety contexts. We also describe an evaluation of the methods in terms of ratings of their ability to address a set of theoretical and practical questions (e.g. the degree to which methods capture static/dynamic aspects of tasks and interactions between system levels). The outcomes from the evaluation highlight a set of gaps relating to the coverage and applicability of current methods for STS and safety (e.g. coverage of external influences on system functioning; method usability). The final sections of the paper describe a set of future challenges, as well as some practical suggestions for tackling these. Practitioner Summary: We provide an up-to-date review of STS methods, a set of case studies illustrating their use and an evaluation of their strengths and weaknesses. The paper concludes with a ‘roadmap’ for future work. Taylor & Francis 2015-04-03 2015-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4566874/ /pubmed/25832121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2015.1015622 Text en © 2015 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Articles Waterson, Patrick Robertson, Michelle M. Cooke, Nancy J. Militello, Laura Roth, Emilie Stanton, Neville A. Defining the methodological challenges and opportunities for an effective science of sociotechnical systems and safety |
title | Defining the methodological challenges and opportunities for an effective science of sociotechnical systems and safety |
title_full | Defining the methodological challenges and opportunities for an effective science of sociotechnical systems and safety |
title_fullStr | Defining the methodological challenges and opportunities for an effective science of sociotechnical systems and safety |
title_full_unstemmed | Defining the methodological challenges and opportunities for an effective science of sociotechnical systems and safety |
title_short | Defining the methodological challenges and opportunities for an effective science of sociotechnical systems and safety |
title_sort | defining the methodological challenges and opportunities for an effective science of sociotechnical systems and safety |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4566874/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25832121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2015.1015622 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT watersonpatrick definingthemethodologicalchallengesandopportunitiesforaneffectivescienceofsociotechnicalsystemsandsafety AT robertsonmichellem definingthemethodologicalchallengesandopportunitiesforaneffectivescienceofsociotechnicalsystemsandsafety AT cookenancyj definingthemethodologicalchallengesandopportunitiesforaneffectivescienceofsociotechnicalsystemsandsafety AT militellolaura definingthemethodologicalchallengesandopportunitiesforaneffectivescienceofsociotechnicalsystemsandsafety AT rothemilie definingthemethodologicalchallengesandopportunitiesforaneffectivescienceofsociotechnicalsystemsandsafety AT stantonnevillea definingthemethodologicalchallengesandopportunitiesforaneffectivescienceofsociotechnicalsystemsandsafety |