Cargando…

Discrepancy of target sites between clinician and cytopathological reports in head neck fine needle aspiration: Did I miss the target or did the clinician mistake the organ site?

The diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of head and neck lesions is relatively high, but cytologic interpretation might be confusing if the sample is lacking typical cytologic features according to labeled site by physician. These errors may have an impact on pathology sear...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khanlari, Mahsa, Daneshbod, Yahya, Shaterzadeh Yazdi, Hanieh, Shirian, Sadegh, Negahban, Shahrzad, Aledavood, Azita, Oryan, Ahmad, Khademi, Bijan, Daneshbod, Khosrow, Field, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4567022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26108921
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.489
_version_ 1782389761736966144
author Khanlari, Mahsa
Daneshbod, Yahya
Shaterzadeh Yazdi, Hanieh
Shirian, Sadegh
Negahban, Shahrzad
Aledavood, Azita
Oryan, Ahmad
Khademi, Bijan
Daneshbod, Khosrow
Field, Andrew
author_facet Khanlari, Mahsa
Daneshbod, Yahya
Shaterzadeh Yazdi, Hanieh
Shirian, Sadegh
Negahban, Shahrzad
Aledavood, Azita
Oryan, Ahmad
Khademi, Bijan
Daneshbod, Khosrow
Field, Andrew
author_sort Khanlari, Mahsa
collection PubMed
description The diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of head and neck lesions is relatively high, but cytologic interpretation might be confusing if the sample is lacking typical cytologic features according to labeled site by physician. These errors may have an impact on pathology search engines, healthcare costs or even adverse outcomes. The cytology archive database of multiple institutions in southern Iran and Australia covering the period 2001–2011, were searched using keywords: salivary gland, head, neck, FNAC, and cytology. All the extracted reports were reviewed. The reports which showed discordance between the clinician's impression of the organ involved and subsequent fine needle biopsy request, and the eventual cytological diagnosis were selected. The cytological diagnosis was confirmed by histology or cell block, with assistance from imaging, clinical outcome, physical examination, molecular studies, or microbiological culture. The total number of 10,200 head and neck superficial FNAC were included in the study, from which 48 cases showed discordance between the clinicians request and the actual site of pathology. Apart from the histopathology, the imaging, clinical history, physical examination, immunohistochemical study, microbiologic culture and molecular testing helped to finalize the target organ of pathology in 23, 6, 7, 8, 2, and 1 cases respectively. The commonest discrepancies were for FNAC of “salivary gland” [total: 20 with actual final pathology in: bone (7), soft tissue (5), lymph node (3), odontogenic (3) and skin (2)], “lymph node” [total: 12 with final pathology in: soft tissue (3), skin (3), bone (1) and brain (1)], “soft tissue” [total: 11 with final pathology in: bone (5), skin (2), salivary gland (1), and ocular region (1)] and “skin” [total: 5 with final pathology in: lymph node (2), bone (1), soft tissue (1) and salivary gland (1)]. The primary physician requesting FNAC of head and neck lesions are incorrect in their clinical impression of the actual site in nearly 0.5 percent of cases, due to the overlapping clinical and imaging findings or possibly due to inadequate history taking or physical examination.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4567022
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45670222015-09-17 Discrepancy of target sites between clinician and cytopathological reports in head neck fine needle aspiration: Did I miss the target or did the clinician mistake the organ site? Khanlari, Mahsa Daneshbod, Yahya Shaterzadeh Yazdi, Hanieh Shirian, Sadegh Negahban, Shahrzad Aledavood, Azita Oryan, Ahmad Khademi, Bijan Daneshbod, Khosrow Field, Andrew Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Research The diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of head and neck lesions is relatively high, but cytologic interpretation might be confusing if the sample is lacking typical cytologic features according to labeled site by physician. These errors may have an impact on pathology search engines, healthcare costs or even adverse outcomes. The cytology archive database of multiple institutions in southern Iran and Australia covering the period 2001–2011, were searched using keywords: salivary gland, head, neck, FNAC, and cytology. All the extracted reports were reviewed. The reports which showed discordance between the clinician's impression of the organ involved and subsequent fine needle biopsy request, and the eventual cytological diagnosis were selected. The cytological diagnosis was confirmed by histology or cell block, with assistance from imaging, clinical outcome, physical examination, molecular studies, or microbiological culture. The total number of 10,200 head and neck superficial FNAC were included in the study, from which 48 cases showed discordance between the clinicians request and the actual site of pathology. Apart from the histopathology, the imaging, clinical history, physical examination, immunohistochemical study, microbiologic culture and molecular testing helped to finalize the target organ of pathology in 23, 6, 7, 8, 2, and 1 cases respectively. The commonest discrepancies were for FNAC of “salivary gland” [total: 20 with actual final pathology in: bone (7), soft tissue (5), lymph node (3), odontogenic (3) and skin (2)], “lymph node” [total: 12 with final pathology in: soft tissue (3), skin (3), bone (1) and brain (1)], “soft tissue” [total: 11 with final pathology in: bone (5), skin (2), salivary gland (1), and ocular region (1)] and “skin” [total: 5 with final pathology in: lymph node (2), bone (1), soft tissue (1) and salivary gland (1)]. The primary physician requesting FNAC of head and neck lesions are incorrect in their clinical impression of the actual site in nearly 0.5 percent of cases, due to the overlapping clinical and imaging findings or possibly due to inadequate history taking or physical examination. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2015-09 2015-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4567022/ /pubmed/26108921 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.489 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Cancer Research
Khanlari, Mahsa
Daneshbod, Yahya
Shaterzadeh Yazdi, Hanieh
Shirian, Sadegh
Negahban, Shahrzad
Aledavood, Azita
Oryan, Ahmad
Khademi, Bijan
Daneshbod, Khosrow
Field, Andrew
Discrepancy of target sites between clinician and cytopathological reports in head neck fine needle aspiration: Did I miss the target or did the clinician mistake the organ site?
title Discrepancy of target sites between clinician and cytopathological reports in head neck fine needle aspiration: Did I miss the target or did the clinician mistake the organ site?
title_full Discrepancy of target sites between clinician and cytopathological reports in head neck fine needle aspiration: Did I miss the target or did the clinician mistake the organ site?
title_fullStr Discrepancy of target sites between clinician and cytopathological reports in head neck fine needle aspiration: Did I miss the target or did the clinician mistake the organ site?
title_full_unstemmed Discrepancy of target sites between clinician and cytopathological reports in head neck fine needle aspiration: Did I miss the target or did the clinician mistake the organ site?
title_short Discrepancy of target sites between clinician and cytopathological reports in head neck fine needle aspiration: Did I miss the target or did the clinician mistake the organ site?
title_sort discrepancy of target sites between clinician and cytopathological reports in head neck fine needle aspiration: did i miss the target or did the clinician mistake the organ site?
topic Clinical Cancer Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4567022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26108921
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.489
work_keys_str_mv AT khanlarimahsa discrepancyoftargetsitesbetweenclinicianandcytopathologicalreportsinheadneckfineneedleaspirationdidimissthetargetordidtheclinicianmistaketheorgansite
AT daneshbodyahya discrepancyoftargetsitesbetweenclinicianandcytopathologicalreportsinheadneckfineneedleaspirationdidimissthetargetordidtheclinicianmistaketheorgansite
AT shaterzadehyazdihanieh discrepancyoftargetsitesbetweenclinicianandcytopathologicalreportsinheadneckfineneedleaspirationdidimissthetargetordidtheclinicianmistaketheorgansite
AT shiriansadegh discrepancyoftargetsitesbetweenclinicianandcytopathologicalreportsinheadneckfineneedleaspirationdidimissthetargetordidtheclinicianmistaketheorgansite
AT negahbanshahrzad discrepancyoftargetsitesbetweenclinicianandcytopathologicalreportsinheadneckfineneedleaspirationdidimissthetargetordidtheclinicianmistaketheorgansite
AT aledavoodazita discrepancyoftargetsitesbetweenclinicianandcytopathologicalreportsinheadneckfineneedleaspirationdidimissthetargetordidtheclinicianmistaketheorgansite
AT oryanahmad discrepancyoftargetsitesbetweenclinicianandcytopathologicalreportsinheadneckfineneedleaspirationdidimissthetargetordidtheclinicianmistaketheorgansite
AT khademibijan discrepancyoftargetsitesbetweenclinicianandcytopathologicalreportsinheadneckfineneedleaspirationdidimissthetargetordidtheclinicianmistaketheorgansite
AT daneshbodkhosrow discrepancyoftargetsitesbetweenclinicianandcytopathologicalreportsinheadneckfineneedleaspirationdidimissthetargetordidtheclinicianmistaketheorgansite
AT fieldandrew discrepancyoftargetsitesbetweenclinicianandcytopathologicalreportsinheadneckfineneedleaspirationdidimissthetargetordidtheclinicianmistaketheorgansite