Cargando…
Discrepancy of target sites between clinician and cytopathological reports in head neck fine needle aspiration: Did I miss the target or did the clinician mistake the organ site?
The diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of head and neck lesions is relatively high, but cytologic interpretation might be confusing if the sample is lacking typical cytologic features according to labeled site by physician. These errors may have an impact on pathology sear...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4567022/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26108921 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.489 |
_version_ | 1782389761736966144 |
---|---|
author | Khanlari, Mahsa Daneshbod, Yahya Shaterzadeh Yazdi, Hanieh Shirian, Sadegh Negahban, Shahrzad Aledavood, Azita Oryan, Ahmad Khademi, Bijan Daneshbod, Khosrow Field, Andrew |
author_facet | Khanlari, Mahsa Daneshbod, Yahya Shaterzadeh Yazdi, Hanieh Shirian, Sadegh Negahban, Shahrzad Aledavood, Azita Oryan, Ahmad Khademi, Bijan Daneshbod, Khosrow Field, Andrew |
author_sort | Khanlari, Mahsa |
collection | PubMed |
description | The diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of head and neck lesions is relatively high, but cytologic interpretation might be confusing if the sample is lacking typical cytologic features according to labeled site by physician. These errors may have an impact on pathology search engines, healthcare costs or even adverse outcomes. The cytology archive database of multiple institutions in southern Iran and Australia covering the period 2001–2011, were searched using keywords: salivary gland, head, neck, FNAC, and cytology. All the extracted reports were reviewed. The reports which showed discordance between the clinician's impression of the organ involved and subsequent fine needle biopsy request, and the eventual cytological diagnosis were selected. The cytological diagnosis was confirmed by histology or cell block, with assistance from imaging, clinical outcome, physical examination, molecular studies, or microbiological culture. The total number of 10,200 head and neck superficial FNAC were included in the study, from which 48 cases showed discordance between the clinicians request and the actual site of pathology. Apart from the histopathology, the imaging, clinical history, physical examination, immunohistochemical study, microbiologic culture and molecular testing helped to finalize the target organ of pathology in 23, 6, 7, 8, 2, and 1 cases respectively. The commonest discrepancies were for FNAC of “salivary gland” [total: 20 with actual final pathology in: bone (7), soft tissue (5), lymph node (3), odontogenic (3) and skin (2)], “lymph node” [total: 12 with final pathology in: soft tissue (3), skin (3), bone (1) and brain (1)], “soft tissue” [total: 11 with final pathology in: bone (5), skin (2), salivary gland (1), and ocular region (1)] and “skin” [total: 5 with final pathology in: lymph node (2), bone (1), soft tissue (1) and salivary gland (1)]. The primary physician requesting FNAC of head and neck lesions are incorrect in their clinical impression of the actual site in nearly 0.5 percent of cases, due to the overlapping clinical and imaging findings or possibly due to inadequate history taking or physical examination. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4567022 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45670222015-09-17 Discrepancy of target sites between clinician and cytopathological reports in head neck fine needle aspiration: Did I miss the target or did the clinician mistake the organ site? Khanlari, Mahsa Daneshbod, Yahya Shaterzadeh Yazdi, Hanieh Shirian, Sadegh Negahban, Shahrzad Aledavood, Azita Oryan, Ahmad Khademi, Bijan Daneshbod, Khosrow Field, Andrew Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Research The diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of head and neck lesions is relatively high, but cytologic interpretation might be confusing if the sample is lacking typical cytologic features according to labeled site by physician. These errors may have an impact on pathology search engines, healthcare costs or even adverse outcomes. The cytology archive database of multiple institutions in southern Iran and Australia covering the period 2001–2011, were searched using keywords: salivary gland, head, neck, FNAC, and cytology. All the extracted reports were reviewed. The reports which showed discordance between the clinician's impression of the organ involved and subsequent fine needle biopsy request, and the eventual cytological diagnosis were selected. The cytological diagnosis was confirmed by histology or cell block, with assistance from imaging, clinical outcome, physical examination, molecular studies, or microbiological culture. The total number of 10,200 head and neck superficial FNAC were included in the study, from which 48 cases showed discordance between the clinicians request and the actual site of pathology. Apart from the histopathology, the imaging, clinical history, physical examination, immunohistochemical study, microbiologic culture and molecular testing helped to finalize the target organ of pathology in 23, 6, 7, 8, 2, and 1 cases respectively. The commonest discrepancies were for FNAC of “salivary gland” [total: 20 with actual final pathology in: bone (7), soft tissue (5), lymph node (3), odontogenic (3) and skin (2)], “lymph node” [total: 12 with final pathology in: soft tissue (3), skin (3), bone (1) and brain (1)], “soft tissue” [total: 11 with final pathology in: bone (5), skin (2), salivary gland (1), and ocular region (1)] and “skin” [total: 5 with final pathology in: lymph node (2), bone (1), soft tissue (1) and salivary gland (1)]. The primary physician requesting FNAC of head and neck lesions are incorrect in their clinical impression of the actual site in nearly 0.5 percent of cases, due to the overlapping clinical and imaging findings or possibly due to inadequate history taking or physical examination. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2015-09 2015-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4567022/ /pubmed/26108921 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.489 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Cancer Research Khanlari, Mahsa Daneshbod, Yahya Shaterzadeh Yazdi, Hanieh Shirian, Sadegh Negahban, Shahrzad Aledavood, Azita Oryan, Ahmad Khademi, Bijan Daneshbod, Khosrow Field, Andrew Discrepancy of target sites between clinician and cytopathological reports in head neck fine needle aspiration: Did I miss the target or did the clinician mistake the organ site? |
title | Discrepancy of target sites between clinician and cytopathological reports in head neck fine needle aspiration: Did I miss the target or did the clinician mistake the organ site? |
title_full | Discrepancy of target sites between clinician and cytopathological reports in head neck fine needle aspiration: Did I miss the target or did the clinician mistake the organ site? |
title_fullStr | Discrepancy of target sites between clinician and cytopathological reports in head neck fine needle aspiration: Did I miss the target or did the clinician mistake the organ site? |
title_full_unstemmed | Discrepancy of target sites between clinician and cytopathological reports in head neck fine needle aspiration: Did I miss the target or did the clinician mistake the organ site? |
title_short | Discrepancy of target sites between clinician and cytopathological reports in head neck fine needle aspiration: Did I miss the target or did the clinician mistake the organ site? |
title_sort | discrepancy of target sites between clinician and cytopathological reports in head neck fine needle aspiration: did i miss the target or did the clinician mistake the organ site? |
topic | Clinical Cancer Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4567022/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26108921 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.489 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT khanlarimahsa discrepancyoftargetsitesbetweenclinicianandcytopathologicalreportsinheadneckfineneedleaspirationdidimissthetargetordidtheclinicianmistaketheorgansite AT daneshbodyahya discrepancyoftargetsitesbetweenclinicianandcytopathologicalreportsinheadneckfineneedleaspirationdidimissthetargetordidtheclinicianmistaketheorgansite AT shaterzadehyazdihanieh discrepancyoftargetsitesbetweenclinicianandcytopathologicalreportsinheadneckfineneedleaspirationdidimissthetargetordidtheclinicianmistaketheorgansite AT shiriansadegh discrepancyoftargetsitesbetweenclinicianandcytopathologicalreportsinheadneckfineneedleaspirationdidimissthetargetordidtheclinicianmistaketheorgansite AT negahbanshahrzad discrepancyoftargetsitesbetweenclinicianandcytopathologicalreportsinheadneckfineneedleaspirationdidimissthetargetordidtheclinicianmistaketheorgansite AT aledavoodazita discrepancyoftargetsitesbetweenclinicianandcytopathologicalreportsinheadneckfineneedleaspirationdidimissthetargetordidtheclinicianmistaketheorgansite AT oryanahmad discrepancyoftargetsitesbetweenclinicianandcytopathologicalreportsinheadneckfineneedleaspirationdidimissthetargetordidtheclinicianmistaketheorgansite AT khademibijan discrepancyoftargetsitesbetweenclinicianandcytopathologicalreportsinheadneckfineneedleaspirationdidimissthetargetordidtheclinicianmistaketheorgansite AT daneshbodkhosrow discrepancyoftargetsitesbetweenclinicianandcytopathologicalreportsinheadneckfineneedleaspirationdidimissthetargetordidtheclinicianmistaketheorgansite AT fieldandrew discrepancyoftargetsitesbetweenclinicianandcytopathologicalreportsinheadneckfineneedleaspirationdidimissthetargetordidtheclinicianmistaketheorgansite |