Cargando…
At what level of unconsciousness is mild therapeutic hypothermia indicated for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a retrospective, historical cohort study
BACKGROUND: Appropriate patient selection is very important when initiating mild therapeutic hypothermia (MTH) for patients following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, and the extent of unconsciousness at implementation must be defined in such cases. However, there are no clear standards regarding the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4567798/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26366291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-015-0104-5 |
_version_ | 1782389844929937408 |
---|---|
author | Natsukawa, Tomoaki Sawano, Hirotaka Natsukawa, Mai Yoshinaga, Yuichi Sato, Shuho Ito, Yusuke Otani, Takayuki Ohba, Jiro Hayashi, Yasuyuki Kai, Tatsuro |
author_facet | Natsukawa, Tomoaki Sawano, Hirotaka Natsukawa, Mai Yoshinaga, Yuichi Sato, Shuho Ito, Yusuke Otani, Takayuki Ohba, Jiro Hayashi, Yasuyuki Kai, Tatsuro |
author_sort | Natsukawa, Tomoaki |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Appropriate patient selection is very important when initiating mild therapeutic hypothermia (MTH) for patients following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, and the extent of unconsciousness at implementation must be defined in such cases. However, there are no clear standards regarding the level of unconsciousness at which MTH would be beneficial. The effects of MTH in patients with different degrees of unconsciousness according to the motor response score of the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) were investigated. METHODS: The subjects consisted of witnessed non-traumatic adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients admitted to our institute from April 2002 to August 2011. The patients were divided into six groups according to the GCS motor response score: 1 (GCS M1), 2 (GCS M2), 3 (GCS M3), 4 (GCS M4), 5 (GCS M5), and 6 (GCS M6). The neurological outcome was evaluated at 30 days after hospital admission using the Cerebral Performance Category. Chi-squared Automatic Interaction Detection (CHAID) analysis was performed to estimate the threshold GCS M level where therapeutic hypothermia is indicated. Odds ratios were then calculated by multiple logistic-regression analysis using factors including GCS M5–6 and MTH. RESULTS: A total of 289 patients were enrolled in this study. CHAID analysis demonstrated two points of significant increase in percentage of good recovery at 30 days after admission, dividing the GCS M categories into three groups. Patients classified with a GCS motor response score of 5 or higher had the highest percentage of good recovery. The odds ratio for good recovery (CPC1–2) was 2.901 (95 % CI 1.460–5.763, P = 0.002) for MTH, and that for GCS M5–6 was 159.835 (95 % CI 33.592–760.513, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: MTH may be unnecessary in patients with a GCS motor response score of 5 or higher. Consequently, because there are post cardiac arrest patients with a GCS motor response score of 4 or lower who benefit from MTH, MTH may be limited to patients with a GCS motor response score of 4 or lower. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4567798 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45677982015-09-13 At what level of unconsciousness is mild therapeutic hypothermia indicated for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a retrospective, historical cohort study Natsukawa, Tomoaki Sawano, Hirotaka Natsukawa, Mai Yoshinaga, Yuichi Sato, Shuho Ito, Yusuke Otani, Takayuki Ohba, Jiro Hayashi, Yasuyuki Kai, Tatsuro J Intensive Care Research BACKGROUND: Appropriate patient selection is very important when initiating mild therapeutic hypothermia (MTH) for patients following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, and the extent of unconsciousness at implementation must be defined in such cases. However, there are no clear standards regarding the level of unconsciousness at which MTH would be beneficial. The effects of MTH in patients with different degrees of unconsciousness according to the motor response score of the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) were investigated. METHODS: The subjects consisted of witnessed non-traumatic adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients admitted to our institute from April 2002 to August 2011. The patients were divided into six groups according to the GCS motor response score: 1 (GCS M1), 2 (GCS M2), 3 (GCS M3), 4 (GCS M4), 5 (GCS M5), and 6 (GCS M6). The neurological outcome was evaluated at 30 days after hospital admission using the Cerebral Performance Category. Chi-squared Automatic Interaction Detection (CHAID) analysis was performed to estimate the threshold GCS M level where therapeutic hypothermia is indicated. Odds ratios were then calculated by multiple logistic-regression analysis using factors including GCS M5–6 and MTH. RESULTS: A total of 289 patients were enrolled in this study. CHAID analysis demonstrated two points of significant increase in percentage of good recovery at 30 days after admission, dividing the GCS M categories into three groups. Patients classified with a GCS motor response score of 5 or higher had the highest percentage of good recovery. The odds ratio for good recovery (CPC1–2) was 2.901 (95 % CI 1.460–5.763, P = 0.002) for MTH, and that for GCS M5–6 was 159.835 (95 % CI 33.592–760.513, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: MTH may be unnecessary in patients with a GCS motor response score of 5 or higher. Consequently, because there are post cardiac arrest patients with a GCS motor response score of 4 or lower who benefit from MTH, MTH may be limited to patients with a GCS motor response score of 4 or lower. BioMed Central 2015-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4567798/ /pubmed/26366291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-015-0104-5 Text en © Natsukawa et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Natsukawa, Tomoaki Sawano, Hirotaka Natsukawa, Mai Yoshinaga, Yuichi Sato, Shuho Ito, Yusuke Otani, Takayuki Ohba, Jiro Hayashi, Yasuyuki Kai, Tatsuro At what level of unconsciousness is mild therapeutic hypothermia indicated for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a retrospective, historical cohort study |
title | At what level of unconsciousness is mild therapeutic hypothermia indicated for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a retrospective, historical cohort study |
title_full | At what level of unconsciousness is mild therapeutic hypothermia indicated for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a retrospective, historical cohort study |
title_fullStr | At what level of unconsciousness is mild therapeutic hypothermia indicated for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a retrospective, historical cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | At what level of unconsciousness is mild therapeutic hypothermia indicated for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a retrospective, historical cohort study |
title_short | At what level of unconsciousness is mild therapeutic hypothermia indicated for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a retrospective, historical cohort study |
title_sort | at what level of unconsciousness is mild therapeutic hypothermia indicated for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a retrospective, historical cohort study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4567798/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26366291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-015-0104-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT natsukawatomoaki atwhatlevelofunconsciousnessismildtherapeutichypothermiaindicatedforoutofhospitalcardiacarrestaretrospectivehistoricalcohortstudy AT sawanohirotaka atwhatlevelofunconsciousnessismildtherapeutichypothermiaindicatedforoutofhospitalcardiacarrestaretrospectivehistoricalcohortstudy AT natsukawamai atwhatlevelofunconsciousnessismildtherapeutichypothermiaindicatedforoutofhospitalcardiacarrestaretrospectivehistoricalcohortstudy AT yoshinagayuichi atwhatlevelofunconsciousnessismildtherapeutichypothermiaindicatedforoutofhospitalcardiacarrestaretrospectivehistoricalcohortstudy AT satoshuho atwhatlevelofunconsciousnessismildtherapeutichypothermiaindicatedforoutofhospitalcardiacarrestaretrospectivehistoricalcohortstudy AT itoyusuke atwhatlevelofunconsciousnessismildtherapeutichypothermiaindicatedforoutofhospitalcardiacarrestaretrospectivehistoricalcohortstudy AT otanitakayuki atwhatlevelofunconsciousnessismildtherapeutichypothermiaindicatedforoutofhospitalcardiacarrestaretrospectivehistoricalcohortstudy AT ohbajiro atwhatlevelofunconsciousnessismildtherapeutichypothermiaindicatedforoutofhospitalcardiacarrestaretrospectivehistoricalcohortstudy AT hayashiyasuyuki atwhatlevelofunconsciousnessismildtherapeutichypothermiaindicatedforoutofhospitalcardiacarrestaretrospectivehistoricalcohortstudy AT kaitatsuro atwhatlevelofunconsciousnessismildtherapeutichypothermiaindicatedforoutofhospitalcardiacarrestaretrospectivehistoricalcohortstudy |