Cargando…
Pregnancy outcomes before and after institution of a specialised twins clinic: a retrospective cohort study
BACKGROUND: Although specialised clinics for multiple pregnancies are recommended by several Obstetrics and Gynaecology governing bodies, studies examining outcome before and after introduction of such clinics remain few, were performed predominantly in North America in the 1990s, and either amongst...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4567816/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26362064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0654-5 |
_version_ | 1782389849189253120 |
---|---|
author | Henry, Amanda Lees, Nicole Bein, Kendall J. Hall, Beverley Lim, Veronica Chen, Katie Qiao Welsh, Alec W Hui, Lisa Shand, Antonia W. |
author_facet | Henry, Amanda Lees, Nicole Bein, Kendall J. Hall, Beverley Lim, Veronica Chen, Katie Qiao Welsh, Alec W Hui, Lisa Shand, Antonia W. |
author_sort | Henry, Amanda |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Although specialised clinics for multiple pregnancies are recommended by several Obstetrics and Gynaecology governing bodies, studies examining outcome before and after introduction of such clinics remain few, were performed predominantly in North America in the 1990s, and either amongst dichorionic twin pregnancies only or where chorionicity was not specified. Our objective, in the modern setting with twins of known chorionicity, was to compare maternal and neonatal outcomes of twin pregnancies before and after commencement of a consultant-led, multidisciplinary twins clinic (TC). METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of 513 women, with birth of twins at ≥20 weeks’ gestation, January 2007 to November 2011, at a metropolitan tertiary maternity hospital, Sydney, Australia. Demographic, pregnancy, and outcome data were obtained from hospital databases. Women receiving TC care (2009–2011) were compared to those receiving general antenatal clinic (ANC) care (2007–2010) and private care (2009–2011). Other models of care were excluded. Main outcome measures were total maternal inpatient stay, mode of birth, gestational age at birth, and neonatal nursery admission. RESULTS: 286 women were included in the main analyses: 84 attended ANC, 101 TC, and 101 a private obstetrician. TC women had similar demographics to ANC women and were slightly younger than private patients. TC women had lower Caesarean section rates (55 % vs. 70 % ANC and 76 % private, p = 0.008) and fewer late preterm (34 + 0–36 + 6 weeks) births, (26 %TC vs. 44 % ANC and 41 % private, p < 0.001). Median maternal inpatient stay was shorter in TC than ANC (7 vs. 8 days, p = 0.009) and similar to private (7 days). Nursery admission rates were higher in private patients (67 % vs. 49 % ANC and 47 % TC, p = 0.001) and average birthweight lower (2283 g vs. 2501 g ANC and 2496 g TC, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Within a single centre, maternal and neonatal twin pregnancy outcomes varied significantly by model of care. Introducing a specialised twins clinic in our setting decreased Caesarean section rates, late preterm birth, and inpatient stay compared to ANC. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12884-015-0654-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4567816 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45678162015-09-13 Pregnancy outcomes before and after institution of a specialised twins clinic: a retrospective cohort study Henry, Amanda Lees, Nicole Bein, Kendall J. Hall, Beverley Lim, Veronica Chen, Katie Qiao Welsh, Alec W Hui, Lisa Shand, Antonia W. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Although specialised clinics for multiple pregnancies are recommended by several Obstetrics and Gynaecology governing bodies, studies examining outcome before and after introduction of such clinics remain few, were performed predominantly in North America in the 1990s, and either amongst dichorionic twin pregnancies only or where chorionicity was not specified. Our objective, in the modern setting with twins of known chorionicity, was to compare maternal and neonatal outcomes of twin pregnancies before and after commencement of a consultant-led, multidisciplinary twins clinic (TC). METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of 513 women, with birth of twins at ≥20 weeks’ gestation, January 2007 to November 2011, at a metropolitan tertiary maternity hospital, Sydney, Australia. Demographic, pregnancy, and outcome data were obtained from hospital databases. Women receiving TC care (2009–2011) were compared to those receiving general antenatal clinic (ANC) care (2007–2010) and private care (2009–2011). Other models of care were excluded. Main outcome measures were total maternal inpatient stay, mode of birth, gestational age at birth, and neonatal nursery admission. RESULTS: 286 women were included in the main analyses: 84 attended ANC, 101 TC, and 101 a private obstetrician. TC women had similar demographics to ANC women and were slightly younger than private patients. TC women had lower Caesarean section rates (55 % vs. 70 % ANC and 76 % private, p = 0.008) and fewer late preterm (34 + 0–36 + 6 weeks) births, (26 %TC vs. 44 % ANC and 41 % private, p < 0.001). Median maternal inpatient stay was shorter in TC than ANC (7 vs. 8 days, p = 0.009) and similar to private (7 days). Nursery admission rates were higher in private patients (67 % vs. 49 % ANC and 47 % TC, p = 0.001) and average birthweight lower (2283 g vs. 2501 g ANC and 2496 g TC, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Within a single centre, maternal and neonatal twin pregnancy outcomes varied significantly by model of care. Introducing a specialised twins clinic in our setting decreased Caesarean section rates, late preterm birth, and inpatient stay compared to ANC. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12884-015-0654-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4567816/ /pubmed/26362064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0654-5 Text en © Henry et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Henry, Amanda Lees, Nicole Bein, Kendall J. Hall, Beverley Lim, Veronica Chen, Katie Qiao Welsh, Alec W Hui, Lisa Shand, Antonia W. Pregnancy outcomes before and after institution of a specialised twins clinic: a retrospective cohort study |
title | Pregnancy outcomes before and after institution of a specialised twins clinic: a retrospective cohort study |
title_full | Pregnancy outcomes before and after institution of a specialised twins clinic: a retrospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | Pregnancy outcomes before and after institution of a specialised twins clinic: a retrospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Pregnancy outcomes before and after institution of a specialised twins clinic: a retrospective cohort study |
title_short | Pregnancy outcomes before and after institution of a specialised twins clinic: a retrospective cohort study |
title_sort | pregnancy outcomes before and after institution of a specialised twins clinic: a retrospective cohort study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4567816/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26362064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0654-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT henryamanda pregnancyoutcomesbeforeandafterinstitutionofaspecialisedtwinsclinicaretrospectivecohortstudy AT leesnicole pregnancyoutcomesbeforeandafterinstitutionofaspecialisedtwinsclinicaretrospectivecohortstudy AT beinkendallj pregnancyoutcomesbeforeandafterinstitutionofaspecialisedtwinsclinicaretrospectivecohortstudy AT hallbeverley pregnancyoutcomesbeforeandafterinstitutionofaspecialisedtwinsclinicaretrospectivecohortstudy AT limveronica pregnancyoutcomesbeforeandafterinstitutionofaspecialisedtwinsclinicaretrospectivecohortstudy AT chenkatieqiao pregnancyoutcomesbeforeandafterinstitutionofaspecialisedtwinsclinicaretrospectivecohortstudy AT welshalecw pregnancyoutcomesbeforeandafterinstitutionofaspecialisedtwinsclinicaretrospectivecohortstudy AT huilisa pregnancyoutcomesbeforeandafterinstitutionofaspecialisedtwinsclinicaretrospectivecohortstudy AT shandantoniaw pregnancyoutcomesbeforeandafterinstitutionofaspecialisedtwinsclinicaretrospectivecohortstudy |