Cargando…

Pregnancy outcomes before and after institution of a specialised twins clinic: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Although specialised clinics for multiple pregnancies are recommended by several Obstetrics and Gynaecology governing bodies, studies examining outcome before and after introduction of such clinics remain few, were performed predominantly in North America in the 1990s, and either amongst...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Henry, Amanda, Lees, Nicole, Bein, Kendall J., Hall, Beverley, Lim, Veronica, Chen, Katie Qiao, Welsh, Alec W, Hui, Lisa, Shand, Antonia W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4567816/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26362064
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0654-5
_version_ 1782389849189253120
author Henry, Amanda
Lees, Nicole
Bein, Kendall J.
Hall, Beverley
Lim, Veronica
Chen, Katie Qiao
Welsh, Alec W
Hui, Lisa
Shand, Antonia W.
author_facet Henry, Amanda
Lees, Nicole
Bein, Kendall J.
Hall, Beverley
Lim, Veronica
Chen, Katie Qiao
Welsh, Alec W
Hui, Lisa
Shand, Antonia W.
author_sort Henry, Amanda
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although specialised clinics for multiple pregnancies are recommended by several Obstetrics and Gynaecology governing bodies, studies examining outcome before and after introduction of such clinics remain few, were performed predominantly in North America in the 1990s, and either amongst dichorionic twin pregnancies only or where chorionicity was not specified. Our objective, in the modern setting with twins of known chorionicity, was to compare maternal and neonatal outcomes of twin pregnancies before and after commencement of a consultant-led, multidisciplinary twins clinic (TC). METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of 513 women, with birth of twins at ≥20 weeks’ gestation, January 2007 to November 2011, at a metropolitan tertiary maternity hospital, Sydney, Australia. Demographic, pregnancy, and outcome data were obtained from hospital databases. Women receiving TC care (2009–2011) were compared to those receiving general antenatal clinic (ANC) care (2007–2010) and private care (2009–2011). Other models of care were excluded. Main outcome measures were total maternal inpatient stay, mode of birth, gestational age at birth, and neonatal nursery admission. RESULTS: 286 women were included in the main analyses: 84 attended ANC, 101 TC, and 101 a private obstetrician. TC women had similar demographics to ANC women and were slightly younger than private patients. TC women had lower Caesarean section rates (55 % vs. 70 % ANC and 76 % private, p = 0.008) and fewer late preterm (34 + 0–36 + 6 weeks) births, (26 %TC vs. 44 % ANC and 41 % private, p < 0.001). Median maternal inpatient stay was shorter in TC than ANC (7 vs. 8 days, p = 0.009) and similar to private (7 days). Nursery admission rates were higher in private patients (67 % vs. 49 % ANC and 47 % TC, p = 0.001) and average birthweight lower (2283 g vs. 2501 g ANC and 2496 g TC, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Within a single centre, maternal and neonatal twin pregnancy outcomes varied significantly by model of care. Introducing a specialised twins clinic in our setting decreased Caesarean section rates, late preterm birth, and inpatient stay compared to ANC. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12884-015-0654-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4567816
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45678162015-09-13 Pregnancy outcomes before and after institution of a specialised twins clinic: a retrospective cohort study Henry, Amanda Lees, Nicole Bein, Kendall J. Hall, Beverley Lim, Veronica Chen, Katie Qiao Welsh, Alec W Hui, Lisa Shand, Antonia W. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Although specialised clinics for multiple pregnancies are recommended by several Obstetrics and Gynaecology governing bodies, studies examining outcome before and after introduction of such clinics remain few, were performed predominantly in North America in the 1990s, and either amongst dichorionic twin pregnancies only or where chorionicity was not specified. Our objective, in the modern setting with twins of known chorionicity, was to compare maternal and neonatal outcomes of twin pregnancies before and after commencement of a consultant-led, multidisciplinary twins clinic (TC). METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of 513 women, with birth of twins at ≥20 weeks’ gestation, January 2007 to November 2011, at a metropolitan tertiary maternity hospital, Sydney, Australia. Demographic, pregnancy, and outcome data were obtained from hospital databases. Women receiving TC care (2009–2011) were compared to those receiving general antenatal clinic (ANC) care (2007–2010) and private care (2009–2011). Other models of care were excluded. Main outcome measures were total maternal inpatient stay, mode of birth, gestational age at birth, and neonatal nursery admission. RESULTS: 286 women were included in the main analyses: 84 attended ANC, 101 TC, and 101 a private obstetrician. TC women had similar demographics to ANC women and were slightly younger than private patients. TC women had lower Caesarean section rates (55 % vs. 70 % ANC and 76 % private, p = 0.008) and fewer late preterm (34 + 0–36 + 6 weeks) births, (26 %TC vs. 44 % ANC and 41 % private, p < 0.001). Median maternal inpatient stay was shorter in TC than ANC (7 vs. 8 days, p = 0.009) and similar to private (7 days). Nursery admission rates were higher in private patients (67 % vs. 49 % ANC and 47 % TC, p = 0.001) and average birthweight lower (2283 g vs. 2501 g ANC and 2496 g TC, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Within a single centre, maternal and neonatal twin pregnancy outcomes varied significantly by model of care. Introducing a specialised twins clinic in our setting decreased Caesarean section rates, late preterm birth, and inpatient stay compared to ANC. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12884-015-0654-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4567816/ /pubmed/26362064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0654-5 Text en © Henry et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Henry, Amanda
Lees, Nicole
Bein, Kendall J.
Hall, Beverley
Lim, Veronica
Chen, Katie Qiao
Welsh, Alec W
Hui, Lisa
Shand, Antonia W.
Pregnancy outcomes before and after institution of a specialised twins clinic: a retrospective cohort study
title Pregnancy outcomes before and after institution of a specialised twins clinic: a retrospective cohort study
title_full Pregnancy outcomes before and after institution of a specialised twins clinic: a retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Pregnancy outcomes before and after institution of a specialised twins clinic: a retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Pregnancy outcomes before and after institution of a specialised twins clinic: a retrospective cohort study
title_short Pregnancy outcomes before and after institution of a specialised twins clinic: a retrospective cohort study
title_sort pregnancy outcomes before and after institution of a specialised twins clinic: a retrospective cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4567816/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26362064
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0654-5
work_keys_str_mv AT henryamanda pregnancyoutcomesbeforeandafterinstitutionofaspecialisedtwinsclinicaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT leesnicole pregnancyoutcomesbeforeandafterinstitutionofaspecialisedtwinsclinicaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT beinkendallj pregnancyoutcomesbeforeandafterinstitutionofaspecialisedtwinsclinicaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT hallbeverley pregnancyoutcomesbeforeandafterinstitutionofaspecialisedtwinsclinicaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT limveronica pregnancyoutcomesbeforeandafterinstitutionofaspecialisedtwinsclinicaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT chenkatieqiao pregnancyoutcomesbeforeandafterinstitutionofaspecialisedtwinsclinicaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT welshalecw pregnancyoutcomesbeforeandafterinstitutionofaspecialisedtwinsclinicaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT huilisa pregnancyoutcomesbeforeandafterinstitutionofaspecialisedtwinsclinicaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT shandantoniaw pregnancyoutcomesbeforeandafterinstitutionofaspecialisedtwinsclinicaretrospectivecohortstudy