Cargando…

Scholarly research productivity is not related to higher three-year licensure pass rates for physical therapy academic programs

BACKGROUND: In the domain of academia, the scholarship of research may include, but not limited to, peer-reviewed publications, presentations, or grant submissions. Programmatic research productivity is one of many measures of academic program reputation and ranking. Another measure or tool for quan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cook, Chad E., Landry, Michel D., Covington, Jeffrey Kyle, McCallum, Christine, Engelhard, Chalee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4567835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26362434
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0431-1
_version_ 1782389853594320896
author Cook, Chad E.
Landry, Michel D.
Covington, Jeffrey Kyle
McCallum, Christine
Engelhard, Chalee
author_facet Cook, Chad E.
Landry, Michel D.
Covington, Jeffrey Kyle
McCallum, Christine
Engelhard, Chalee
author_sort Cook, Chad E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the domain of academia, the scholarship of research may include, but not limited to, peer-reviewed publications, presentations, or grant submissions. Programmatic research productivity is one of many measures of academic program reputation and ranking. Another measure or tool for quantifying learning success among physical therapists education programs in the USA is 100 % three year pass rates of graduates on the standardized National Physical Therapy Examination (NPTE). In this study, we endeavored to determine if there was an association between research productivity through artifacts and 100 % three year pass rates on the NPTE. METHODS: This observational study involved using pre-approved database exploration representing all accredited programs in the USA who graduated physical therapists during 2009, 2010 and 2011. Descriptive variables captured included raw research productivity artifacts such as peer reviewed publications and books, number of professional presentations, number of scholarly submissions, total grant dollars, and numbers of grants submitted. Descriptive statistics and comparisons (using chi square and t-tests) among program characteristics and research artifacts were calculated. Univariate logistic regression analyses, with appropriate control variables were used to determine associations between research artifacts and 100 % pass rates. RESULTS: Number of scholarly artifacts submitted, faculty with grants, and grant proposals submitted were significantly higher in programs with 100 % three year pass rates. However, after controlling for program characteristics such as grade point average, diversity percentage of cohort, public/private institution, and number of faculty, there were no significant associations between scholarly artifacts and 100 % three year pass rates. CONCLUSIONS: Factors outside of research artifacts are likely better predictors for passing the NPTE.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4567835
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45678352015-09-13 Scholarly research productivity is not related to higher three-year licensure pass rates for physical therapy academic programs Cook, Chad E. Landry, Michel D. Covington, Jeffrey Kyle McCallum, Christine Engelhard, Chalee BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: In the domain of academia, the scholarship of research may include, but not limited to, peer-reviewed publications, presentations, or grant submissions. Programmatic research productivity is one of many measures of academic program reputation and ranking. Another measure or tool for quantifying learning success among physical therapists education programs in the USA is 100 % three year pass rates of graduates on the standardized National Physical Therapy Examination (NPTE). In this study, we endeavored to determine if there was an association between research productivity through artifacts and 100 % three year pass rates on the NPTE. METHODS: This observational study involved using pre-approved database exploration representing all accredited programs in the USA who graduated physical therapists during 2009, 2010 and 2011. Descriptive variables captured included raw research productivity artifacts such as peer reviewed publications and books, number of professional presentations, number of scholarly submissions, total grant dollars, and numbers of grants submitted. Descriptive statistics and comparisons (using chi square and t-tests) among program characteristics and research artifacts were calculated. Univariate logistic regression analyses, with appropriate control variables were used to determine associations between research artifacts and 100 % pass rates. RESULTS: Number of scholarly artifacts submitted, faculty with grants, and grant proposals submitted were significantly higher in programs with 100 % three year pass rates. However, after controlling for program characteristics such as grade point average, diversity percentage of cohort, public/private institution, and number of faculty, there were no significant associations between scholarly artifacts and 100 % three year pass rates. CONCLUSIONS: Factors outside of research artifacts are likely better predictors for passing the NPTE. BioMed Central 2015-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4567835/ /pubmed/26362434 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0431-1 Text en © Cook et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Cook, Chad E.
Landry, Michel D.
Covington, Jeffrey Kyle
McCallum, Christine
Engelhard, Chalee
Scholarly research productivity is not related to higher three-year licensure pass rates for physical therapy academic programs
title Scholarly research productivity is not related to higher three-year licensure pass rates for physical therapy academic programs
title_full Scholarly research productivity is not related to higher three-year licensure pass rates for physical therapy academic programs
title_fullStr Scholarly research productivity is not related to higher three-year licensure pass rates for physical therapy academic programs
title_full_unstemmed Scholarly research productivity is not related to higher three-year licensure pass rates for physical therapy academic programs
title_short Scholarly research productivity is not related to higher three-year licensure pass rates for physical therapy academic programs
title_sort scholarly research productivity is not related to higher three-year licensure pass rates for physical therapy academic programs
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4567835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26362434
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0431-1
work_keys_str_mv AT cookchade scholarlyresearchproductivityisnotrelatedtohigherthreeyearlicensurepassratesforphysicaltherapyacademicprograms
AT landrymicheld scholarlyresearchproductivityisnotrelatedtohigherthreeyearlicensurepassratesforphysicaltherapyacademicprograms
AT covingtonjeffreykyle scholarlyresearchproductivityisnotrelatedtohigherthreeyearlicensurepassratesforphysicaltherapyacademicprograms
AT mccallumchristine scholarlyresearchproductivityisnotrelatedtohigherthreeyearlicensurepassratesforphysicaltherapyacademicprograms
AT engelhardchalee scholarlyresearchproductivityisnotrelatedtohigherthreeyearlicensurepassratesforphysicaltherapyacademicprograms